RE: The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

2004-02-20 Thread Anthony Youngman
all this. Now I know - there's a nagbot on the loose :-) Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Wallis Sent: 19 February 2004 23:59 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUO

RE: The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Wallis
on Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is > "wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it. I think Charlie is write to point out that dogmatism on any matter is usually wrong. Ray