37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files
For some strange reason, the DICT of each Part File needed to contain
copies of the I-Types from the Distributed File's DICT in order for
CREATE.INDEX to work correctly.
Next question... To avoid having to
f [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 20:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files
For some strange reason, the DICT of each Part File needed to contain
copies of the I-Types from the Distributed File's DICT in order for
CREATE.INDEX to work correctly.
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files
For some strange reason, the DICT of each Part File needed to contain
copies of the I-Types from the Distributed File's DICT in order for
CREATE.INDEX to work correctly.
Next question... To avoid having to copy DICT items
Sorry, forgot to mention: UniVerse 9.5 on AIX 4.3.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For some strange reason, the DICT of each Part File needed to contain
copies of the I-Types from the Distributed File's DICT in order for
CREATE.INDEX to work correctly.
Next question... To avoid having to copy DICT items to all the Part Files
each time a change is made, I updated the VOC pointe
Have you compiled the i-descriptor fields? Try listing the field you're
trying to declare as an index, just before you declare it.
It's a pain - some commands (LIST) will do an auto-compile, but most
just refuse. If you've done almost anything to the DICT entry since you
last did a LIST of that fi
