Dear David,
Thanks for the reply. Question 5 does not have a yes or no answer. I
find it quite odd that you say yes to 4 and no to 2. Can you explain?
If you were a classic frequentist, you'd say no to both. I would say
yes to 2 and no to 4.
By the way, I just submitted another post with my
I'll bite.
1. yes
2. no
3. yes
4. yes
5. yes
Rich Neapolitan wrote:
Let's have some fun in this group again instead of just posting about
conferences, post docs, and new books, etc. I offer you this quiz about
the use of the Bonferroni (or any other) correction:
I have 1,000,000 hypotheses
Call For Participation
IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING 2010
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor USA
18-21 August 2010, Ann Arbor, USA
http://www.icdl-2010.org
This is an invitation to attend the
Ninth IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning
Apologies for cross-postings
**
CALL FOR PAPERS
**
6th International Workshop on
Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web
http://c4i.gmu.edu/ursw/2010
In
===
First Call for Papers
for
WSOM 2011, 8th WORKSHOP ON SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS
13 - 15 June 2011, Espoo, Finland
Aalto University School of
Apologies for cross-postings
---
Call for Participation
---
UniDL'10
First International Workshop on Uncertainty in
Wow. You do have a rationale for your answer to 4. I completely
disagree with it but it's a rational.
At 02:42 PM 7/2/2010, David Pennock wrote:
Oops, I meant 1,000,000 for question 5.
I'm not a statistician. I reasoned this way: If I somehow explore
lots of hypotheses I need to correct for
Oops, I meant 1,000,000 for question 5.
I'm not a statistician. I reasoned this way: If I somehow explore lots
of hypotheses I need to correct for that, otherwise I may overfit. In 2,
I only checked one randomly chosen hypothesis and stopped exploring
after that.
In 4 and 5, I've in some
Dear Marcus,
Thanks much for responding.
My real point was that Bonferroni (or any other correction) makes
little sense regardless of how we slice it. Consider these two scenarios:
1. Blood is found at the scene of a murder and the husband is the
suspect. They are about to test the
Postdoctoral Research Associate Position
The Teamcore Research Group
Computer Science Department
University of Southern California
July 2010
The Teamcore group (http://teamcore.usc.edu) is focused on research on
multi-agent systems where multiple agents (including software agents,
robots and
Just a reminder
Call for Participation for Plan, Activity ad Intent Recognition AAAI Workshop
(PAIR-2010).
Apology for cross posting.
Workshop: July 11/12, 2010
URL: http://people.ict.usc.edu/~pynadath/PAIR-2010/
Workshop Description
Plan recognition, activity recognition, and
Hi Rich,
Since no other helping hand seems in sight, let me jump in:
I have 1,000,000 hypotheses that are not mutually exclusive.
1. I test them all. Do I apply the Bonferroni correction?
2. I plan to test them all, but I run out of resources after testing
only one of them. Do I apply the
PhD studentship position at 4C in collaboration with Intel
We are seeking applicants for a PhD position at Cork Constraint Computation
Centre (4C), on a collaborative project between 4C and the Intel Labs
Europe IT research team, Leixlip, Ireland. This will be jointly funded by
the Irish
Apologies for cross-postings
***Intelligent User Interfaces -- IUI-2011 ***
***Palo Alto, CA, USA, 13-16 February 2011 ***
*** Call for Workshop Proposals ***
Background and Motivation
Workshops provide a forum for focused discussions on
14 matches
Mail list logo
