Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Mike Hammett
Also, don't expect them to comment on the lawsuit. Parties in a lawsuit rarely ever talk about it publicly. I don't hold that against them. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Kees H."

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Ben Moore via Ubnt_users
As for the bold statement, I am not sure what is looked for here other than we are firmly committed to continuing to grow in the WISP space and I think our product development will prove that out. We have recently released AF products, AirMax products, new routers and switches, made significant

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 8/13/18 09:41, RickG wrote: > With respect, we don't know everything about the lawsuit. Also, I'd bet > if the shoe were on the other foot, another manufacturer would sue a WISP. I presume you've read the suit to make that claim?

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread RickG
With respect, we don't know everything about the lawsuit. Also, I'd bet if the shoe were on the other foot, another manufacturer would sue a WISP. On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:47 AM Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote: > > > > Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Kees H.
Ben, with all due respect. I do not see that BOLD statement that Steve requested. And for wisps requesting this for ptp links. We are a small wisp. We would never buy only 2 for a just a ptp link. Yes we do have some ptp links, but the ratio of ptmp v ptp is maybe 1 -200. Even as a small

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread dan
August 13, 2018 7:47 AM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote: > On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote: > >> Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my request to Ubiquity to make a BOLD >> statement in some way that >> shows your commitment to the WISP community and your appreciation to those >> of us that

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread James Wilson
That's good to hear Ben. Singles and five packs work for us. And replacement feedhorns, 5 packs of feedhorns for 5AC 400 mm dishes are good, but we need the same for 500 mm dishes and 2 AC. This is not just about the money, we just don't need the dishes and hardware piling up. Less waste!

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Ben Moore via Ubnt_users
Hi Steve - No question the 2-pack was poor decision. This was never designed for retail, but can definitely see it looks like it with the packaging. The 2-pack was due to many using for quick ptp links with their WISP. Had a lot of request for selling as singles or 2-pack for this purpose.

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote: > > Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my request to Ubiquity to make a BOLD > statement in some way that shows your commitment to the WISP community and > your appreciation to those of us that have stuck by your side through years > of "soon GPS",

[Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs

2018-08-13 Thread Steve Barnes
This is again another time that UBNT eyes have moved off the WISP target and moved to the Retail space. The reason for 2 in a box is simple if you’re selling to retail small businesses. You would sell these as a link for 2 buildings. Therefor you need a 2 pack. If you were selling them on