Steve,
I had similar issue on M5 XW Rocket. Station side of Backhaul would stop
sending data but would stay connected to AP. I could access both
remotely. Once I rebooted remotely through the radio access or Air
Control, the Station side the tower connected and clients had service.
I tried
Jay,
At the range your charts shows, 2.4 works but 5 is better for your 10 meg
speeds. I have a mix and have been splitting my 2.4 sectors and adding 5
gbs sectors for heavy users as I was seeing the 2.4 sectors struggle with
the increased number of clients as I increased plans for faster speed!
Agreed.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> IMO you should be replacing the backhaul with licensed before chewing up
> more 5 GHz spectrum. Use the 5 GHz to your customers.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100
IMO you should be replacing the backhaul with licensed before chewing up
more 5 GHz spectrum. Use the 5 GHz to your customers.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:09 PM, RickG wrote:
>
LOL, ya. More power hogs here:
http://www.balticnetworks.com/ubiquiti-airfiber-nxn-8x8-mimo-multiplexer.html
Anyone try these yet?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Damned full duplex radios consuming all the electricities.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
>
OK, that's exactly what I was looking for. They all seem to have a
heartbeat set for the old AC1 server. Thanks for the quick reply!
*** TD ***
Cyber Mesa Telecom
Santa Fe Headquarters
Tel 505-988-9200
On 1/6/2017 1:39 PM, Ridgetop Networks wrote:
> You need to SSH into the radios that are
You need to SSH into the radios that are sending the SYN packets, and use
mca-provision-list and mca-provision-rm to find and remove the entries for
the old AC1 server.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Tim Densmore wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm seeing a strange
Hi Folks,
I'm seeing a strange widespread issue on my network so I thought I'd run
it by the group. We had an AC1 server that was decommissioned several
months ago when we moved to AC2. AC2 is up and working fine in a
totally different subnet in a totally different physical location - no
issue
yes - we dealt with this a few years ago - several radios were talking to an
old server the company we purchased ran. that subnet was no longer even valid
on our network. i remember googling and finding this solution (referenced
below) to resolve
- Original Message -
From:
In AC1, weren't you able to script a task to execute on the devices? I
don't see where you can do that in AC2.
On Fri, January 6, 2017 4:04 pm, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
>
> yes - we dealt with this a few years ago - several radios were talking to
> an old server the company we purchased ran.
I'm just using ansible.
*** TD ***
Cyber Mesa Telecom
Santa Fe Headquarters
Tel 505-988-9200
On 1/6/2017 2:25 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
> In AC1, weren't you able to script a task to execute on the devices? I
> don't see where you can do that in AC2.
>
> On Fri, January 6, 2017 4:04 pm, CBB -
The alternative data rate profile may be worth a try, also.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:14 AM, wrote:
> Jay,
>
> At the range your charts shows, 2.4 works but 5 is better for your 10 meg
> speeds. I have a mix and have been splitting my 2.4 sectors and adding 5
> gbs sectors for
Yup. My AF24 is pulling right around 50 watts. Of course, that's two
radios. Even my AF5s are pulling about 40 watts.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Rory Conaway
wrote:
> I think you are thinking of the AF24’s. They draw quite a bit more.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:*
Damned full duplex radios consuming all the electricities.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:58 AM, RickG wrote:
> Yup. My AF24 is pulling right around 50 watts. Of course, that's two
14 matches
Mail list logo