The alternative data rate profile may be worth a try, also.

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:14 AM, <t...@byhalia.net> wrote:

> Jay,
>
> At the range your charts shows, 2.4 works but 5 is better for your 10 meg
> speeds.  I have a mix and have been splitting my 2.4 sectors and adding 5
> gbs sectors for heavy users as I was seeing the 2.4 sectors struggle with
> the increased number of clients as I increased plans for faster speed!  My
> issue is 5 Ghz does not travel through trees like the 2.4 gbs does for me,
> so I work to balance those towers with more choices for installers, but I
> am connecting up to 6 miles in my area for many.
>
> I would also try turning Airmax off.  In my area it doesn't always help
> and actually slows the clients down, which may be the issue.  Also, check
> power settings on radios around the customers complaining or certain
> towers as the local interference from those radios may be impacting you.
> I have some down to 6 power if they are 1/2 mile of less with clean line
> of sight to tower.  Works fine and reduces interference I generate.
>
> Good Luck!
>
> Troy
>
> >
> > will play with 5.6.9 later today - anyone else able to comment on this?
> > back to the initial question - am i trying too hard with 10 meg packages
> > on 2.4 rockets with these numbers?
> > should the radios be able to do that?
> >
> > do i need to go post in ubnt forums? :)
> >
> > maybe i will.... lol
> >
> >
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: RickG
> >   To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> >   Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:12 AM
> >   Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp
> >
> >
> >   Yes and the time frame matches the 5.6.x FW suspicion. It comes & goes
> > and so far I have not been able to pinpoint it.
> >
> >
> >   On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Ken Patrick <patr...@my9ja.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     Jay,
> >
> >
> >     We get these complaints from customers and I have always ignored it
> as
> > long as everything looks fine from our end.
> >     But this has increased significantly since the Virus and 5.6.x
> > firmware and I think we need to critically look at it and not dismiss
> > it. There is no way a ton of customers can be hallucinating at the
> > same time
> >
> >
> >     The complaints are usually in the form of its slow or  the internet
> > goes off and on especially if you are on the DFS band.
> >
> >
> >     Is anyone else experiencing this kinds of complaints ??
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     Regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:45 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller
> > <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >       oh, if you're wondering, management downgraded him to our lowest
> > package today and said "do not upgrade him even if he asks"
> >       we suspect he'll visit his parents more :)
> >       base package is 3 meg
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: CBB - Jay Fuller
> >         To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> >         Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:40 PM
> >         Subject: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp
> >
> >
> >
> >         We've got an average of 14 users on our 2.4 rockets.  10 mhz
> > channels.  some are sectors, some are omnis.
> >
> >         Currently one 2.4 rocket has 13 connections (one guy dropped for
> > t-mobile??!!)   I guess that makes sense, no one
> >         else has t-mobile down here.... - so here are the current stats :
> >
> >         airmax quality - 83%
> >         airmax capacity - 80%
> >
> >         here is the stations list and their signals -
> >
> >
> >
> >         Access point is running 6.0 ; stations are 5.6.3
> >         That'll change soon - maybe end of January.
> >
> >
> >         I have a 2nd 2.4 rocket we are also monitoring - it also has 14
> > users on it
> >
> >         airmax quality is 75%
> >         airmax capacity is 70%
> >
> >         also running 6.0  stations are 5.6.3
> >
> >         \
> >
> >         I am selling 10 meg packages off these access points.  In some
> > cases folks are buying more than that.
> >         Sometimes I can get 22 meg linktests using the ubnt speed tests.
> >
> >         I've noticed in the last week or two i've seen people
> > disconnecting -
> >
> >         "i'm only getting 2 meg, this is not acceptable"
> >
> >         here's my favorite - a kid files a complaint against us with the
> > bbb -
> >
> >         "If you can avoid doing business with this company, I would
> > STRONGLY suggest it. This company is very sneaky, and claims that
> > the incredibly poor service and frequent downtime is simply out of
> > their hand. They offer a "completely unlimited package" for xxxxx
> > in which they CLAIM "as much connectivity as your radio allows".
> > After compiling data from around 100+ bandwidth connections tests
> > over the course of 6 months, with the average speed being around
> > 7Mbits (896 kilobytes). The pricing is not even close to
> > reflecting the service, the cap on the xxxxxx  package is 10Mbits,
> > so I am not even reaching the average on that. I can only say that
> > the highest tier package is nothing short of a scam. Whenever I
> > called to complain about this outrageous service, I was told that
> > it was too bad, and that nothing will be done. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx is a
> > conman, relying on shady business tactics to further his greed."
> >
> >         btw - i can't recall any downtime within the last year and, well,
> > i just love human beings.
> >
> >         i am wondering - - am i asking too much out of these access
> > points?
> >
> >         usage graphed -
> >
> >         access point 1 -
> >
> >
> >
> >         access point #2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         btw - i should add the kid who filed the complaint lives in his
> > parents barn (yes, i said barn) and has
> >         his own connection separate from his parents.
> >
> >         question - am i asking too much of these access points?
> >
> >         yes - i'm waiting on the rocket 2ac prism - - and these are our
> > two busiest 2.4 rockets - - but
> >         i am also getting complaints on other parts of our network.
> >
> >         ok - thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> >
> >
> >       _______________________________________________
> >       Ubnt_users mailing list
> >       Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >       http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> >       _______________________________________________
> >       Ubnt_users mailing list
> >       Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >       http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Ubnt_users mailing list
> >     Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   --
> >
> >   -RickG KyWiFi
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> >
> >
> >   _______________________________________________
> >   Ubnt_users mailing list
> >   Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to