Re: [Ubnt_users] Brand new UAP-AC-M(US) for sale

2017-04-17 Thread Josh Luthman
It's a nice system but we're not interested in it at this time. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 17, 2017 5:40 PM, "Nathan Babcock" wrote: > We run a unifi controller on our server farm and when we

Re: [Ubnt_users] Brand new UAP-AC-M(US) for sale

2017-04-17 Thread Nathan Babcock
We run a unifi controller on our server farm and when we install unifi’s for customers, we put them on it so we can manage it in the future for them. The requirement is so small, we don’t bother charging them. Works great for our more pretentious customers who call saying the internet is

Re: [Ubnt_users] Brand new UAP-AC-M(US) for sale

2017-04-17 Thread Hexis
Josh, I will buy it for close to list price. Hit me off list or PM me on facebook. Thanks, -Riley On 4/17/2017 3:00 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Does anyone want this? I got it today from a back order only to realize that it's Unifi only - there's no standalone firmware. I was hoping it was a

[Ubnt_users] Brand new UAP-AC-M(US) for sale

2017-04-17 Thread Josh Luthman
Does anyone want this? I got it today from a back order only to realize that it's Unifi only - there's no standalone firmware. I was hoping it was a Pico m2hp replacement and unfortunately it isn't. I'm hoping to get as close to what I paid as possible, I simply opened the box and powered it

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

2017-04-17 Thread Tim-GM
Tests from tower TCP/IP resulted in 500 x 650 So adequate Had are first rain storm over the weekend, Did OK, Lost a little throughput but no dropped links Will keep on learning Next step licensed links. Wide selection to choose from The 24Ghz did prove that I was hitting throughput

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-17 Thread Mathew Howard
Our AF11 link is doing 500Mbps, but I haven't gotten it working at more than 256QAM (it's right at the edge of where 1024QAM should work and still needs to be fine tuned, so hopefully I'll be able to get it there), so they should get to 600ish with 1024QAM. If I remember right, they claim

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-17 Thread Mike Hammett
That's as measured by their fan boys, who don't visit here. UBNT's top claim is 1.2+ gbps. Cut that in half for single direction peak you get 600. However one of their fanboys was posting that he was getting ~500 megabit on his link. It's entirely possible that others have gotten closer to

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-17 Thread Nate Burke
I think I've seen you make this claim a few times, but I don't recall seeing it from anyone else. Is this your real world experience, or where is this info coming from? Any test data to look at? Test equipment used , latency, packet loss, signal levels, PCN expectations? Based on Knowing

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-17 Thread Jon Langeler
AF11x and B11 both use ofdm so they won't be as efficient. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Apr 16, 2017, at 8:35 PM, J Portman wrote: > > The numbers don't feel "right". > > My SIAEs do 436mbps per channel each way on 56HMZ and 1024QAM (tested). > > So either