Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

On 04/25/2016 01:59 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 04/25/2016 11:45 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Alex M >> wrote: >>> Historically we haven't done a great job of keeping stable very >>> relevant, but people running servers in

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

On 04/25/2016 11:45 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Alex M wrote: Historically we haven't done a great job of keeping stable very relevant, but people running servers in production really ought to be using it and not unstable. Maybe a

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

Renaming Testing would be fine. No one except testers should ever point to it. The current usage of that repo is to build new versions, make sure all the cross deps build, and then use it to cleanly push to the Unstable repo via the ppa copy tools. This prevents use from breaking unstable when

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

Thanks Angelos for the work. I'm in favor of removing testing. If we keep it, we should name it experimental. I actually proposed doing so earlier. Kind Regards, Johan On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Micha Silver wrote: > > > > > On 04/25/2016 08:26 PM, Randal Hale wrote: >

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

  On 04/25/2016 08:26 PM, Randal Hale wrote: -- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:26:31 -0400 To: Ubuntu From: Randal Hale

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

Hi, 2016-04-25 19:26 GMT+02:00 Randal Hale : > Unstable has always been a bit confusing (at least for me) because we had > "stable" packages in a unstable repo. Maybe you could do a Stable/Testing or > Stable/Unstable. We've only ever had one relevant ppa and that