Hi,

2016-04-25 19:26 GMT+02:00 Randal Hale <rjh...@northrivergeographic.com>:
> Unstable has always been a bit confusing (at least for me) because we had
> "stable" packages in a unstable repo. Maybe you could do a Stable/Testing or
> Stable/Unstable. We've only ever had one relevant ppa and that has been
> unstable.

as GRASS packager I would use stable repo for stable releases and
testing/unstable for RCs. Moreover it's easier to maintain two repos
rather then two. Bearing in mind man power which UbuntuGIS project
has. Martin

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
_______________________________________________
UbuntuGIS mailing list
Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

Reply via email to