Hi everyone,
During the last weekend, I've set up a daily build recipe for saga gis.
https://launchpad.net/~johanvdw/+archive/sagacvs
So anyone who would like to get the latest version of saga can add
this ppa to his sources.
Since we are close to releasing version 2.0.6 (release candidate is
I have gdal from the unstable repository installed, and it contains
support for hdf4/5.
Are you sure you are running the version from ubuntugis unstable?
Can you be more specific and tell which version you actually use:
dpkg -s libgdal1-dev
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, nikos ves
am still
getting an error:
error: module library
available module libraries:
... shows all the available modules
Thanks for you help
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a known bug in saga 2.0.5. Not really problematic - it seems
Have you tried specifying the output format? gdal_translate will
create geotiff by default. Perhaps that is causing the problem: qgis
thinks it is reading a ecw file, where in reality it's a geotiff
So
gdal_translate in.ecw out.tif -a_srs EPSG:3078
or
gdal_translate in.ecw out.ecw -a_srs
Hello everybody,
While checking the osgeo-live dvd I noticed that saga no longer can
open geotiff files. I'm adding ubuntugis and debian-gis in cc: as this
issue also affects ubuntugis-unstable and debian experimental.
The same is true for the orfeo toolbox [1] and most likely other
software
Gdal 1.9 has been uploaded to debian experimental. Consider building
that version on your pc and check if there are any problems. Let's
keep our development in one place.
http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/gdal
Johan
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Etienne Tourigny
From my own packaging experience (saga gis, some attempts at mapguide) I
don't think the major hurdles are in the specific packaging for debian or
ubuntu, but rather in the build procedures. Creating a package is easy if:
1) the package builds automatically from source without special
Katie,
this error is no proble,. It is part of the configure file to check
what error is returned if you try to include a non-existing file. This
way the script can recognise it if you try to include non-existing
files which you actually need.
So: don't worry.
Johan
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at
Hamish,
can you give some extra info on the JAI tightening?
Anyway even without JAI changes we should really consider whether our
first focus should not be to get rid of this NON FREE/NON OPENSOURCE
library. I don't think people using the live dvd are aware of this
problematic license. JAI is in
Sounds like a good idea, but I just would like to add that it would be
even better if packages found there way to debian unstable. This will
make sure they arrive in the standard repositories (universe).
I haven't updated saga on ubuntugis for a while because we had a good
release in universe.
Nobody reacted so I'd like to raise this again. This error is
currently blocking saga from re-entering ubuntugis for versions
precise and up.
Johan
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
Since the update to version 4.8.0 the proj package
Thanks for the report. Unfortunately I forgot to attend...
To anyone going to FOSS4G as well: there will be a bird-of feather
session for the osgeo live dvd. Since they are basically doing the
same (packaging/writing install scripts for debian/ubuntu) it would be
nice if you could drop by (no
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:41 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others in
this project).
+1
1. This project definitely needs a strong leader with experience.
Or PSC, I
Rather than taking decision, I think the PSC should make sure that
decisions are made.
Whatever we call them, I think the ideal PSC could learn a lot from
the osgeo live project. I think Cameron has done/is doing an excellent
job at managing that project, which in fact is quite similar to
Everyone,
I waited a little for the release of wxwidgets 3.0, which happened 2 days ago.
Since I see no objection to my plan I will continue and push the
updates to testing. If grass still builds fine there I will copy to
-unstable.
Johan
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Johan Van de Wauw
At version 1.10 with libgdal1h I mean.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight).
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal
Johan
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com wrote
Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight).
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal
Johan
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/2013 06:23 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
The third and difficult part is the deb packaging itself. Here we have
several possible paths:
1. Use all the standard tools in Debian packaging and create/update
packages on UbuntuGIS ppa.
I personally would welcome
Quick addition concerning mapserver: I've updated all versions in
universe (precise,quantal,raring, saucy) to fix security issues [1,2].
I've also updated stable for precise[3].
Concretely this means that quantal, raring and saucy in stable and
quantal and raring in unstable are still affected.
Jerome,
I think we should not include apache2 in ubuntugis: this is an
important server package with an enormous amount of reverse
dependencies.
Moreover we can not provide the necessary security updates that a
package like apache2 requires.
Since your package seems to break some existing
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
I'd also be looking at the future,
working on the latest git/svn versions of packages rather than trying
to build the released versions, so changes are picked up in the new
versions rather than seperately in eg debian
This is a bug in ubuntugis grass.
Johan
-- Forwarded message --
From: rnuske 1355...@bugs.launchpad.net
Date: Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM
Subject: [Bug 1355037] [NEW] qgis-plugin-grass and grass-core version mismatch
To: johan.vandew...@gmail.com
Public bug reported:
For
Two things:
You get an error because you have not added the key. In that case you
can not verify who signed the packages.
You can add the key using:
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv DD45F6C3
gpg --export --armor DD45F6C3 | sudo apt-key add -
The other warnings about duplicate entries
Are these packages based on the debian repository?
Can you please tag releases there?
___
UbuntuGIS mailing list
Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
Bas
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Johan,
On 10/21/2014 10:53 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
Sebastiaan,
I'm not too worried about these failure yet, there is still more to do
for the GDAL 1.11.1 packaging.
Can you comment
On ubuntu, run sudo make install
Alternatively, you may wait a few days until gdal 1.11.1 hits
ubuntugis-unstable.
Johan
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:11 PM, alassane toure atou...@gmail.com wrote:
Group,
I downloaded the gdal version 1.11.1 and followed instructions provided in
-lgdal
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
On ubuntu, run sudo make install
Alternatively, you may wait a few days until gdal 1.11.1 hits
ubuntugis-unstable.
Johan
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:11 PM, alassane toure atou
information
available (required by ./mosaic_test)
Same error when compiled under the new gdal version! Any thoughts?
Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:22 PM, alassane toure atou...@gmail.com wrote:
No error as a result!!! Thank you very much!
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
You can add a provides field to the debian/control file.
So qgis-server provides qgis-mapserver.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-virtual
Johan
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
I support the rename of qgis-mapserver
I should add that you probably want to add a replaces/breaks as well,
because upgrading from qgis-mapserver to qgis-server may otherwise
give errors (if the old mapserver is still there it will give
conflicts when installing the new one).
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
Pedro,
I just uploaded. However, I have no access to a precise machine so I
was unable to test it.
Please report whether things work well.
Johan
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Pedro Venâncio
pedrongvenan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if it is not planned to update SAGA for older Ubuntu
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine
fran...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:21:40PM +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
Hello,
I know that at least Bas (Couwenberg) and I will be going to FOSDEM[1]
31 january-1 february in Brussels (Belgium). Since this year
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Alan Boudreault
boudreault.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Good idea. I'm totally +1 to make some active members admin too.
Alan
On 15-01-09 11:23 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 01/09/2015 05:05 PM, Alan Boudreault wrote:
All, what do you think? Feel free to
Hi all,
Ubuntugis has seen relatively little attention recently. Partly, this
may actually be a good sign: Debian GIS has been improving a lot
lately, which means that Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) and Ubuntu Utopic
(14.10) were released with many recent libraries/programs out of the
box.
Personally I
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
This are my thoughts, but I really want to encourage everyone to say
what should be the priorities.
Adding some statistics to the discussion
Both ubuntugis stable and unstable are really used a lot
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi list,
since grass7 is now stable, there has also been an update of the
gdal-grass plugin [1]. Would it be possible to reflect this update in
the Ubuntu packages?
The Debian package for GDAL 1.11.2 and the
César,
Until a new package is uploaded, remove the grass-gui package and
install it again (you will get grass 6.
apt-get remove grass grass-core grass-dev grass-doc grass-dev-doc grass-gui
apt-get update
apt-get install grass
Or wait one day more, I think I'll upload a working version of grass7
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, César Augusto Ramírez Franco
caesar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Johan,
I upgraded the grass packages this morning and I have Grass 7 starting fine
now, thank you.
Cool - please report any problems, I am currently not using grass, so
I don't encounter them..
Luís,
I believe this is possible by using the grass ppa by Martin Landa (cc):
https://launchpad.net/~grass/+archive/ubuntu/grass-stable
Then install the package grass7.
I should add I have not tested this myself.
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Luís de Sousa
Hi all,
Our ubuntugis repository currently uses 8.3 Gb from 8 Gb available.
To make some place I would like to delete all packages from oneiric
(11.10) and quantal (11.10). Both are currently unsupported by ubuntu
(oneiric since may 2013, quantal since may 2014).
That is, unless anyone opposes
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
On Wed, 25. Feb 2015 at 22:22:38 +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
To make some place I would like to delete all packages from oneiric
(11.10) and quantal (11.10). Both are currently unsupported by ubuntu
(oneiric
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Carlos Cerdán sig.up...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Johan
Well... I think there isn't error, QGIS doesn't works with GRASS 7.0,
doesn't yet, so, in order to work with QGIS and his GRASS plugin, I think
it's better to have the stable repository and leave ubuntugis for
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all, Johan,
I am playing little bit with joining effort of GRASS 7 packaging and I
see one GRASS 7 package for Trusty in UbuntuGIS. I was looking to Git
repository on
This has been fixed in Debian.
I'm uploading a new version to ubuntugis.
Kind regards,
Johan
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Ignacio Borlaf ignacio.bor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Recently i started working with ubuntu and GRASS, and I noticed that
v.in.lidar is not available without
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
This has been fixed in Debian.
I'm uploading a new version to ubuntugis.
I wrongly assumed that the version on osgeolive contained the fixes
from Debian. I've uploaded again.
Kind Regards,
Johan
Hi all,
I'm backporting GMT from debian (experimental) to ubuntu.
I used a small fix for the makefile (which I added to the git repository [1])
But now I get a problem compiling some of the documentation when
compiling on i386.
Anyone a clue what could be wrong/what can be done to fix this?
PM, Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try it. Since I have no access to a trusty box now I'l upload to
my ppa and see whether it works ...
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM, sebastic sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2015-07-16 14:29, sebastic wrote:
I'll see if I can
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Mike Farmer m...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi Johan,
I checked again in Synaptic and it does appear to be on my system. I
reinstalled it and I tried creating the postgis extension again:
psql -d gis -c 'CREATE EXTENSION postgis'
and got a new return:
ERROR: could
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> With the possible exception of nightly dev builds, I don't want to package
> osm2pgsql, but I will if no one else does.
I'm willing to guide you through the process if needed.
It may well be that just cloning the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> Since it seems no one from Debian GIS nor UbuntuGIS is willing or able
> to maintain osm2pgsql releases for Ubuntu, I'd like to offer my help to
> Paul with maintaining osm2psql packaging for Ubuntu if he agrees
Hello Paul,
Anything packaged by Debian GIS is a good candidate for UbuntuGIS in my opinion.
Our team is currently small, rather than adding the package myself I'd
prefer giving you (or someone else) access to upload to UbuntuGIS.
Perhaps you can provide packages once in a ppa of your own so we
Hi all,
Last year, we had a meeting with some debian gis members during FOSDEM.
As you can probably guess I'll be around again this year. Anyone else attending?
Note that like previous year there is a distributions devroom and a
geospatial devroom, so enough interesting stuff is happening :-)
Hello Martin,
Great news.
You page contains the necessary steps if all you have to do is just a
plain backport. In reality you will often have to add patches to
support older versions of ubuntu.
Perhaps you should tell where exactly you are stuck?
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote:
>>
>> Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and
>> QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable?
We mostly need people to do it. Currently osgeo live is more up to
Thanks Angelos for the work.
I'm in favor of removing testing. If we keep it, we should name it experimental.
I actually proposed doing so earlier.
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Micha Silver wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 04/25/2016 08:26 PM, Randal Hale wrote:
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Worth Lutz wrote:
> Thanks,
> My error on our versions. It's 12 & 14. I typed without thinking.
>
> I understand dependencies sometimes keep updates from getting to older
> systems. I was hoping to jump to 16.04 but will have to wait on
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
>
> Currently only trusty and xenial are checked, precise is not worth the
> effort IMNSHO:
>
>
Just one remark: precise is still used a lot, and one important application
are travis build scripts which are used by
I'm in favor of removing testing and adding "experimental" instead.
This is closer to the actual way we use the ppa.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Randal Hale <
rjh...@northrivergeographic.com> wrote:
> from my perspective it should be (which will completely break policy on
> several fronts)
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> We should plan to make the transition on ubuntugis-experimental before
> moving to unstable.
>
>
I agree.
Are there any packages beside gdal for which people have an interest
in an updated version?
I don't know
Hi all,
Sorry for reviving an old discussion, but I was in need of a recent
gdal package today for travis. I have added this to my own ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~johanvdw/+archive/ubuntu/gdal
Angelos, Bas, do you have a list of gdal dependencies and the order in
which they need to be built? I'm
Forwarding this to ubuntugis as well:
We have a strange problem with compiling gdal with informix support:
compilation (well linking actually) goes well on debian testing and stretch
and on Ubuntu trusty, but fails on Xenial.
It also fails when we use older versions of gcc on trusty
Kind
Jürgen,
Thx,
I will have a look whether we can merge this (perhaps a seperate
module, so windows users can still use the old liblas).
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer <j...@norbit.de> wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On Wed, 29. Nov 2017 at 12:28:22 +
Thomas,
I added pdal to ubuntugis unstable.
Please test and report back!
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Thomas Kreuzer
<thomas.kreu...@uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
> On 11/29/17 12:28, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> The problem is that S
63 matches
Mail list logo