Yes, very grue, what I ment is that if orca or anything else wich
comes with ubuntu does not improve enough that there should be another
option available even if it does not come with ubuntu. But yes orca
came a long way it seems.
On 07/01/2013, Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.info wrote:
I don't see how it's so hard, or detramental to your points to remove the shiny
stuff line from a comment is hard, or in anyway takes away from the force of
what you are saying; butt burnout is burnout.
I wouldn't have even written to say that. I will say that you have just
discovered or
Check out the latest version of ChromeVox, it was just released in the
last few days, it again allows you to set the ChromeVox key, and has
more key mapping options, and just handles remapping of keys much more
slickly! It doesn't eliminate the issue of key map collisions, but it
does a lot to
Agreed as is often the case.
I will say that vinegar's fine, but well applied. Take that how you as the
readers will...lol.
I just want to add that no one has to take the lead, or decide they want to
take the lead to be of value in the fight. And if it turns out not to be a
fight and more of a
Hi KK and all,
I certainly was not trying to suggest that writing about Windows should be
anyone's focus in their interactions with Canonical execs, or any Linux devs.
On the other hand howeverknowing that others have managed to make important
bits accessible lets folks know that they need to
I do lots of things with my computer using Linux. Granted, my primary
distro is Arch Linux rather than Ubuntu, so I get all the latest stuff
as soon as it's released, but I don't use Windows, except the very rare
times when I need to print something, because I have yet to purchase a
good
Well said.
On 01/07/2013 03:14 PM, Kyle wrote:
I do lots of things with my computer using Linux. Granted, my primary
distro is Arch Linux rather than Ubuntu, so I get all the latest stuff
as soon as it's released, but I don't use Windows, except the very
rare times when I need to print
On 01/07/2013 02:51 PM, kendell clark wrote:
ouch. Pms, maybe?
Nope, just my zero tact and diplomacy rearing its head. If people like
their choices, then great. More power to them. But I have a short fuse
with being criticized for daring to question the status quo, or for
implying that
And yes, I agree, things are getting better. I never said they weren't,
nor have I said that they were bad. My primary point is that we're
seeing *lots* of companies backing QT for mobile accessibility,
Canonical being the latest of those, and we aren't seeing any commitment
by those companies
I agree with this sentiment. I'd only nit pick a few points. Canonical
isn't making money at all yet, let alone with Ubuntu Phone. That being
said, accessibility needs to be built in from the get though, and it
can't wait until Canonical is profitable or making money off of Ubuntu
Phone.
I don't
QT accessibility in Linux still has a long way to go. I'm not denying
this. However, giving credit where credit is due, QT accessibility has
made major improvements, going from near zero just 2 years ago to
something that in many cases is mostly usable, and even surpasses the
level of QT
Couldn't have said it better myself.
On 01/07/2013 06:21 PM, Kyle wrote:
QT accessibility in Linux still has a long way to go. I'm not denying
this. However, giving credit where credit is due, QT accessibility has
made major improvements, going from near zero just 2 years ago to
something
12 matches
Mail list logo
