Eric,
It's always very good to have a person speaking on behalf of himself or
herself as a user representing an actual need. There is a lack of this for
people with mobility based access problems in these forums for free
software, compared to the areas of low or no vision. Part of the problem is
On 3/21/2018 3:03 PM, Mats L wrote:
> Eric,
>
> It's always very good to have a person speaking on behalf of himself
> or herself as a user representing an actual need. There is a lack of
> this for people with mobility based access problems in these forums
> for free software, compared to the
That goes for switch users too: Dasher may be very efficient for text entry
(if you are a relatively fluent reader and can learn to cope with the
navigation mode), but you will need an appropriate OSK for editing and for
the handling of your system in general.
Mats
2018-03-21 9:17 GMT+01:00
El 20/03/18 a las 10:35, Alex ARNAUD escribió:
Are you aware of differences between eviacam and GNOME mousetrap?
I didn't try recent versions, thus I cannot answer
What is as you know the most efficient way to write text with a head-tracking
software?
As Thibaut suggested, I think
Le 20/03/2018 à 17:33, Alex ARNAUD a écrit :
Hello Thibaut,
Le 20/03/2018 à 11:14, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Le 20/03/2018 à 10:35, Alex ARNAUD a écrit :
What is as you know the most efficient way to write text with a
head-tracking software?
Dasher comes to mind:
I've tested it, looks
On 3/21/2018 11:30 AM, Alex ARNAUD wrote:
> Le 21/03/2018 à 15:27, Eric Johansson a écrit :
>> On 3/20/2018 5:35 AM, Alex ARNAUD wrote:
>>>
>>> What is as you know the most efficient way to write text with a
>>> head-tracking software?
>> I'm frustrated by this kind of question because
On 3/20/2018 5:35 AM, Alex ARNAUD wrote:
>
> What is as you know the most efficient way to write text with a
> head-tracking software?
I'm frustrated by this kind of question because frequently, this is the
wrong question. you should be asking what is the appropriate interface
to enable the person
Le 20/03/2018 à 18:31, Mats L a écrit :
Both Onboard and Caribou were intended as replacements of GOK, but are
not really.
GOK was an ambitious effort to provide tailorable access for individuals
with major motor difficulties, including need for single and double
switch input. But it was not a
> Is onboard not the continuation of GOK?
>
> Samuel
>
Both Onboard and Caribou were intended as replacements of GOK, but are not
really.
GOK was an ambitious effort to provide tailorable access for individuals
with major motor difficulties, including need for single and double switch
input. But
Le 20/03/2018 à 10:35, Alex ARNAUD a écrit :
What is as you know the most
efficient way to write text with a head-tracking software?
Dear Alex,
Dasher comes to mind:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dasher_(software)
Kind regards, Thibaut.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Hi Alex and all,
I can confirm Cesar's description of the functionality of eViacam as a very
objective and accurate one (despite - or thanks to - his direct involvement
;-)
I have been doing som content management for OATSoft for several years, but
unfortunately the maintenance broke down a
Alex ARNAUD, on mar. 20 mars 2018 17:33:25 +0100, wrote:
> Is Dasher should be configured to replace the keyboard when I open a text
> edition field?
IIRC that has never been implemented. It would be a matter of making it
e.g. an ibus input method or such.
Samuel
--
Ubuntu-accessibility
Mats L, on mar. 20 mars 2018 16:22:25 +0100, wrote:
> Unfortunately the GNU/Linux environments are badly missing a full-featured
> tailorable on-screen keyboard alternative (including switch input etc.)
> following up on the [4]GOK project since it was discontinued.
Is onboard not the
Hello Thibaut,
Le 20/03/2018 à 11:14, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Le 20/03/2018 à 10:35, Alex ARNAUD a écrit :
What is as you know the most efficient way to write text with a
head-tracking software?
Dear Alex,
Dasher comes to mind:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dasher_(software)
I've
Le 19/03/2018 à 20:46, Cesar Mauri a écrit :
* Does head-tracking is really efficient?
(Disclaimer: I'm the author of eViacam and EVA Facial Mouse)
Are you aware of differences between eviacam and GNOME mousetrap?
However, if you mean whether is there a FOSS head tracker solution
available
* Does head-tracking is really efficient?
(Disclaimer: I'm the author of eViacam and EVA Facial Mouse)
If by efficiency you mean achieving the same throughput than a regular mouse,
then the answer is no. I'm not aware about any head tracker solution able reach
the same low difficulty level
have you tried the Unified Listing? http://ul.gpii.net part of
http://GPII.net
use advanced search (or standard search) and type Linux in the search box.
I found 63 hardware and software accessibility products that cite LINUX in
their descriptions.
Don’t see any eye trackers
17 matches
Mail list logo
