Hey everyone
I just wanted to reiterate what Vish is saying here about keeping the
non photo submissions in the same group as the photo ones. I'll copy in
here what I've posted on the Flickr group page.
Hi everyone
There seems to be some confusion around submissions for Natty. To
reiterate
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Iain Farrell iain.farr...@canonical.comwrote:
Hey everyone
I just wanted to reiterate what Vish is saying here about keeping the non
photo submissions in the same group as the photo ones. I'll copy in here
what I've posted on the Flickr group page.
Hi
John,
Respectfully I add that once again the overwhelming conversation has been
about organizing art, instead of art. It is pointless, boring, and lately
highly divisive. We have already lost a team member that I highly respected.
Arguing over flickr groups accomplishes nothing. absolutely
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Saleel Velankar svela...@gmail.comwrote:
John,
Respectfully I add that once again the overwhelming conversation has been
about organizing art, instead of art. It is pointless, boring, and lately
highly divisive. We have already lost a team member that I
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:21 AM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Saleel Velankar svela...@gmail.comwrote:
John,
Respectfully I add that once again the overwhelming conversation has been
about organizing art, instead of art. It is pointless, boring, and
2011/2/21 Leandro Gómez leo.tel...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:21 AM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Saleel Velankar svela...@gmail.comwrote:
John,
Respectfully I add that once again the overwhelming conversation has been
about organizing
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 11:49 -0500, John Baer wrote:
Sadly and with out a doubt folks will walk away with a bitter taste in
their
mouth and these folks are respected contributors to the greater
artwork
community.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi,
In case folks have not seen Thorsten's post about this:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/watch-out-regarding-natty-wallpaper-submissions/
The submissions for the natty wallpaper illustration *should* be in the
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 08:50 -0500, John Baer wrote:
My assumption is you share
the same role as the rest of us - Artwork Team member.
Nah, Vish is supreme leader of all Artdom, we elected him last night in
a rigged ballet.
Seriously John, that high-horse of yours is looking rickety. If you
On the other hand, a separate group for artwork makes much more sense than
mixing it with photography. Participators can look for inspiration and
judges won't have to separate artwork from photos. John, I can't deny that I
like using a separate group for artwork. But why didn't you discuss this
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:50 AM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi,
In case folks have not seen Thorsten's post about this:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/watch-out-regarding-natty-wallpaper-submissions/
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 19:55 +0300, Сергей wrote:
On the other hand, a separate group for artwork makes much more sense
than mixing it with photography. Participators can look for
inspiration and judges won't have to separate artwork from photos.
Yep, thats why submissions were in a separate
AFAIR, his group was created before the announcement of using art-owl, and
he tested art-owl and knows its shortcomings perfectly. He knew that art-owl
won't work. But the lack of coordination screwed a very good initiative
again.
You know, John is not the only person on this list who acts first
Hi,
In case folks have not seen Thorsten's post about this:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/watch-out-regarding-natty-wallpaper-submissions/
The submissions for the natty wallpaper illustration *should* be in the
Ubuntu Artwork Group : http://www.flickr.com/groups/ubuntu-artwork/
and
14 matches
Mail list logo
