Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-07-03 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Joao Inacio wrote: - How much of this "ubuntu distinctiveness" is really needed on the other included wallpapers (not default)? Even though this i completely agree on the default wallpaper, from my humble POV a few extra wallpapers that didnt quite follow the rules to the point,

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-07-03 Thread Michiel Sikma
Op 3-jul-2006, om 10:31 heeft Mark Shuttleworth het volgende geschreven: You're absolutely right - for non-default wallpapers we could relax this criterion. However, the number of wallpapers we can include on the installation CD is limited by space. I'm not sure, for example, if Dapper

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-30 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Michiel Sikma wrote: They don't necessarily have to be distinctly Ubuntu, I believe. That's up for debate. I think that nice photos that are included by default can be abstract enough as well simply to be good filler material. Besides, how would you make them classify as Ubuntu-ish, anyway? Do

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-30 Thread Joao Inacio
On 6/30/06, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michiel Sikma wrote: They don't necessarily have to be distinctly Ubuntu, I believe. That's up for debate. I think that nice photos that are included by default can be abstract enough as well simply to be good filler material. Besides, how

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-30 Thread Who
It would be really, really nice if someone would write this up as a wiki page as guidelines for an Ubuntu wallpaper! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/Guidelines/WallPapers -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Étienne Bersac wrote: For me, the branding on the Breezy background was great - it belnded in very well with the backdrop - an generally looked 'cool'. Agree, but it was too dark. Especially if we have window shadow. I've no problem if there are SOME desktop wallpapers

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread Matthew Nuzum
On 6/29/06, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Étienne Bersac wrote: For me, the branding on the Breezy background was great - it belnded in very well with the backdrop - an generally looked 'cool'. Agree, but it was too dark. Especially if we have window shadow. I've no problem

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread Michiel Sikma
Op 29-jun-2006, om 16:14 heeft Matthew Nuzum het volgende geschreven: On 6/29/06, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Étienne Bersac wrote: For me, the branding on the Breezy background was great - it belnded in very well with the backdrop - an generally looked 'cool'. Agree,

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Michiel Sikma wrote: Op 29-jun-2006, om 16:14 heeft Matthew Nuzum het volgende geschreven: On 6/29/06, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Étienne Bersac wrote:  For me, the branding on the Breezy background was great - it belnded in very

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread jmak
On 6/29/06, Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/29/06, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Étienne Bersac wrote: For me, the branding on the Breezy background was great - it belnded in very well with the backdrop - an generally looked 'cool'. Agree, but it was too dark.

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread Matthew Nuzum
On 6/29/06, Michiel Sikma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Op 29-jun-2006, om 16:14 heeft Matthew Nuzum het volgende geschre For inspiration, I strongly suggest looking at what other OSs are doing. Most computers come from the manufucaturer with the maker's branding on the wall paper. Stop into your

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-29 Thread Michiel Sikma
Op 29-jun-2006, om 17:00 heeft Matthew Nuzum het volgende geschreven: On 6/29/06, Michiel Sikma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Op 29-jun-2006, om 16:14 heeft Matthew Nuzum het volgende geschre For inspiration, I strongly suggest looking at what other OSs are doing. Most computers come from the

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-27 Thread Michiel Sikma
Op 27-jun-2006, om 16:11 heeft Troy James Sobotka het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2006-27-06 at 07:33 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: The desktop colour should not be too bright, or it becomes tiring to look at all day. We generally have chosen to go with darker, richer colours so that

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-27 Thread Michiel Sikma
Op 27-jun-2006, om 16:13 heeft Michiel Sikma het volgende geschreven: Op 27-jun-2006, om 16:11 heeft Troy James Sobotka het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2006-27-06 at 07:33 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: The desktop colour should not be too bright, or it becomes tiring to look at all

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-27 Thread Who
On 6/27/06, Troy James Sobotka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-27-06 at 07:33 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: The desktop colour should not be too bright, or it becomes tiring to look at all day. We generally have chosen to go with darker, richer colours so that there is less strain on

Re: [ubuntu-art] Mark's Comments on Branding

2006-06-27 Thread Étienne Bersac
Hello, For me, the branding on the Breezy background was great - it belnded in very well with the backdrop - an generally looked 'cool'. Agree, but it was too dark. Especially if we have window shadow. Étienne. -- Verso l'Alto ! -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com