[Fwd: Re: What VM technology to use?]

2008-08-13 Thread Cary Bielenberg
Owen Townend wrote: 2008/8/13 Senectus . [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/8/13 Daniel Mons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Gear wrote: | If you want to virtualise Windows, nothing comes close to VMware in | terms of functionality. Paul, Could you please expand on this? I'm currently running 4x HP

Re: [Fwd: Re: What VM technology to use?]

2008-08-13 Thread Cary Bielenberg
Dave Hall wrote: On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 19:40 +1000, Cary Bielenberg wrote: I guess the main problem from my perspective is documentation spit polish of Xen KVM makes it hard if you only administer 10 odd machines, It's ok if you eat sleep breath these apps but to the sysadmins who have

Re: [Fwd: Re: What VM technology to use?]

2008-08-13 Thread Daniel Mons
Cary Bielenberg wrote: I guess the main problem from my perspective is documentation spit polish of Xen KVM makes it hard if you only administer 10 odd machines, It's ok if you eat sleep breath these apps but to the sysadmins who have to multi skill it is almost prohibitive to setup.

Re: [Fwd: Re: What VM technology to use?]

2008-08-13 Thread Cary Bielenberg
Daniel Mons wrote: Cary Bielenberg wrote: I guess the main problem from my perspective is documentation spit polish of Xen KVM makes it hard if you only administer 10 odd machines, It's ok if you eat sleep breath these apps but to the sysadmins who have to multi skill it is almost

Re: [Fwd: Re: What VM technology to use?]

2008-08-13 Thread Daniel Mons
Cary Bielenberg wrote: My references to it being a pig to install is borne out of frustration, I didn't articulate my feelings well! What I was trying to say is that unless you are dedicated to learning the intricacies of the software it is a struggle to grasp install. Again, I can't see