Well, generally speaking, yes, I can, but it would take a long time as
I'm not using Ubuntu and its derived distros like Linux Mint at home or
on any server I administer. Besides that I'm not sure that it should be
patched into distro package exactly as I had posted here as the solution
above was
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: autofs5
Following the example in https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Autofs I'm
trying to automount the root of a NFS server but it doesn't work:
$ ls -l /net/server
ls: cannot access /net/server: No such file or directory
$ ls -l /net/server/
ls: cannot
I've never done this before, so I hope I'm using the forum correctly.
I have the same scenario Chris, but I have a fresh install of Ubuntu
10.10. Now I'm not able to install any other packages as this failed
installation is retried with every other install I do. Was there an
update to the
ACK on the debdiff. Package is now uploaded to -proposed for SRU team
processing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654549
Title:
[SRU] Tomcat6 fails to upgrade if
Dianne: If I remember correctly, this warning didn't actually cause the
package install to fail. Maybe you have another problem? What exactly is
the error message you get?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in
Hello Chris...
I cannot tell how much I appreciate your willingness to give this a look with
me!! I've been in network technologies since 1992, but I'm just starting with
Linux.
I have attached a txt file of the complete output from my attempt to
install Bacula. Maybe that will help you help ME
Serge,
We'd have to go back a ways to get the logs you need. What kind of
oopses did you have in mind?
I think most of it is explained above, i.e.:
1) An update to some component of libvirt and/or kvm was part of an
update to the VM _host_.
2) Upon installing the update, the update process
** Attachment added: dpkg.log.1.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/767218/+attachment/2082471/+files/dpkg.log.1.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: term.log.1.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/767218/+attachment/2082497/+files/term.log.1.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
* Starting Bacula Director...
21-Apr 10:23 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at lex.c:784
Config error: expected a string, got T_EOL: =
: line 236, col 12 of file /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
dbname = ; DB Address = ; dbuser = ; dbpassword =
That is your problem. It is already reported
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: autofs5
Overview:
In an environment with over 11K mount points in the table (/proc/mounts) and
using autofs5 with autofs5-ldap support, rebooting the machine takes forever
since autofs leaves many orphaned entries in /proc/mounts.
Running automount
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767218
Title:
Guest machines crashed during apt-get update/upgrade on
Thanks for the extra info. Absolutely this is a very important bug.
It's not supposed to happen at all.
Unfortunately the logs in comments #5 and #6 don't have any info about
libvirt or kvm updates. They appear to end around March 25, whereas the
bug appears to have happened on April 5. can
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 578536 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578536
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 578536
when stopped, automount orphans some mounts
* You can subscribe to bug 578536 by following this link:
** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Server Team (ubuntu-server)
** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Medium
** Also affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
I've tried to reproduce this by re-install libvirt-bin on a 10.04.2 LTS
while kvm was running, with vnc to the kvm VM open the whole time. Also
re-installed qemu-kvm. Could not reproduce.
Still looking.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
It shouldn't fail as of revno 1257 as noted above :)
Did you try that revno?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711534
Title:
euca-upload-bundle fails when
In addition to the info requested in comment #7, please also provide the
result of
ls /var/crash
grep -A10 Oops /var/log/syslog
grep -A10 BUG /var/log/syslog
virsh dumpxml server1
virsh dumpxml server2
Is there anything interesting about your storage setup? Are you using
I'm not sure what's running on partner cloud :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711534
Title:
euca-upload-bundle fails when connecting to Eucalyptus and a path in
Sysadmin-nawfi,
Can you confirm that you have lost network/communication with both vm
servers during the update??
Leonardo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767218
Hi Serge,
I did some testing too and I could not reproduce the error.
What I notice was when logged using Gnome once the update stops libvirt-bin
sometimes it closes virt-manager or it stops listing the virtual machines which
is considered a normal behaviour.
In none of the cases I had my
Definitely not that :)
This is fixed in the source but not released in package form yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711534
Title:
euca-upload-bundle fails
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
During installation of several packages (krb5-config, krb5-user), when a
dialog popped up, I provided correct information about my realm.
Information that has worked in the past on other machines.
When I then ran kinit I got Cannot find KDC for requested
** Package changed: ubuntu = krb5 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769191
Title:
Incorrect configuration at installation
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
[Expired for ntp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: elinks
elinks accepts self-signed certificates without warning or raising an
error. Sadly, this is a regression that got introduced somewhere between
hardy and karmic. With hardy's version (0.11.3-5ubuntu2):
# elinks -dump -eval 'set
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to elinks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769354
Title:
elinks accepts self-signed ssl certificates without warning
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 700036 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700036
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #700036, so it is being marked as such. Please look
I can confirm this. On my Acer 1830TZ with AR9287 it's the same in an
300Mbit Wireless environment the connection is incredibly slow in natty
(tested since alpha 3) while under maverick it works quite well. The
interesting thing is that under maverick for some time i used the
backports wireless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 703366 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703366
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #703366, so it is being marked as such. Please look
I have the same problem in 11.04.
System starts and propose me enter login password in console, but I can't do
it, because console hidden by violet screen (without Ubuntu logo and progress
bar). So I must wait about 10 minutes for gdm start.
I can load in recovery mode (and must hope that
I take the last sentence back ... I've just had a crash
From: Paul W 761...@bugs.launchpad.net
To: dp.wilkin...@btopenworld.com
Sent: Friday, 22 April, 2011 9:02:16
Subject: Re: [Bug 761632] Re: crash on startup before any activities
Hi Bryce,
Freezes seem to
I cannot reproduce any of the artifacts anymore with chromium or other
applicatoins with which I had noticed the issues previously. The main
change being the stackattack removal (rev. 2751) and the additional
xsync on XUngrabServer (rev. 2752).
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
3 minutes is inherently finite, or infinitely less then infinite.
However, I can confirm this at least for 10.04 and even on a package
without dependencies. Selecting sl for installation took 3 minute 1s.
Also,
Beware, it seems Mozilla Firefox blocks requests to upload files from
/proc. If attaching the file fails, copy it over to your home directory
and select it from there.
** Tags added: lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tzdata
Freshly installed Ubuntu 10.04.2 amd64, at first boot i tried to install
the package ubuntu-restricted-extras through software center. Almost
at the end of the process i got this error.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768858
Title:
package tzdata 2011e-0ubuntu0.10.04 failed to install/upgrade: il
sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768862
Title:
thinkpad_acpi: WARNING: Outdated ThinkPad BIOS/EC firmware
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Trying to set up email with standard email program in 11.04
ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic 2.6.38-8.42
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
AlsaVersion:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
1) Ubuntu Natty 11.04 (beta 2)
2) compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu2
3) The title bar contents should change when the application changes it.
4) The change doesn't happen until the window loses focus -- or some other
event requires compiz to
Public bug reported:
Trying to set up email
ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic 2.6.38-8.42
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768859
Title:
thinkpad_acpi: WARNING: Outdated ThinkPad BIOS/EC firmware
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Have you installed the package firmware-b43-installer ? This is
necessary.
Quoting http://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx :
The b43-fwcutter package (as of 1:013~git20100413-1) no longer acquires
firmware, separate installer packages are now used.
** Changed in: b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu)
Status: New
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
I totally agree with Benjamin's comment above. The System Setting
entry should be moved from the last place in the list, though I think
the best place should be as first in the listing.
There is a logical order that is broken with System Setting being the
last entry. The list goes from the least
Actually I'm not on Virtualbox but on VMware Fusion...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649809
Title:
the session settings manager can try starting before the login screen
one exits
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 758880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758880
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 758880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758880
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Tags removed: amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758880
Title:
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 758880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758880
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 758880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758880
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: app-install-data-partner
i don't know
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: app-install-data-partner 12.11.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768865
Title:
package app-install-data-partner 12.11.04.2 failed to install/upgrade:
errore nello scrivere su standard output: File o directory non
Public bug reported:
Desktop bug, i must reboot
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gnome-user-guide 3.0.0+git20110406ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Apr 22 10:43:52 2011
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768864
Title:
package gnome-user-guide 3.0.0+git20110406ubuntu6 failed to
install/upgrade: errore nello scrivere su standard output: File o
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
For example in the attachment in Firefox you can see a small white line
in both left and right of the tab list. It happens after I boot the
system and start applications for the first time. Another example
Nautilus shows a white line at the bottom
** Attachment added: Screenshot-8.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768863/+attachment/2081724/+files/Screenshot-8.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768863
Title:
Fullscreen
I attached a bug watch to a similar bug in Debian also requesting a
newer version of denemo. Since Ubuntu is based on Debian, when a newer
version of a package is available in Debian, it will also appear in
Ubuntu after a while.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #601639
I can confirm the problem. The patch attached should fix this.
Thank you for your report.
** Attachment added: Force-depends fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/767634/+attachment/2081753/+files/patch
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
**
Of course you still need --force-depends to get it to work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634
Title:
dpkg regression --force-depends
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping and helping
to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, the package installation log
attached to this bug report does not contain any useful information.
Could you check your system for a non-empty /var/log/apt/term.log and
attach it to the
Mathieu,
Yes, this problem still exists, I'm still working on it when I available.
You can use that dkms package before we have find out a solution.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
gnome 3 install problem
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gnome-user-guide 3.0.0+git20110406ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Apr 22 10:43:52 2011
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768867
Title:
package gnome-user-guide 3.0.0+git20110406ubuntu6 failed to
install/upgrade: errore nello scrivere su standard output: File o
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gcalctool
That's a bug from gnome 3 app install
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gcalctool 6.0.1~git20110421-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768866
Title:
package gcalctool 6.0.1~git20110421-0ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: errore nello scrivere su standard output: File o
directory non
I've had the same issue on my Upgrade from Maverick to Natty. I didn't
use fglrx on Maverick, but had it installed once. Mainly removing
/usr/lib/fglrx and /usr/lib32/fglrx manually solved the problem. I guess
those where some leftovers from an incomplete Maverick fglrx uninstall.
--
You
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 758880
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 758880
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 758880
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 695191
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
* You can subscribe to bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 758880
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 758880
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
** Tags added: 0day-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740864
Title:
Find result is too light gray
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look
Marcus,
I'm not sure if you installed the dkms package correctly.
Could you paste the result of dkms status and lsusb here?
And try to make the module in /usr/src/ar3011-1.1ryu2.3/ar3011-1.1ryu2.3/ and
paste the log as well.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = AceLan Kao
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #758880, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide,
I've marked bug #758880 as a duplicate of this, as this is earlier, and
has more duplicates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695191
Title:
package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apport
doing aptitude dist-upgrade
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic i686
ApportLog:
AptOrdering:
apport:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768870
Title:
package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: podproces
zainstalowany skrypt post-installation zwrócił kod błędu 1
--
Looks like dkms failed to recognize the older kernel?
** Package changed: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) = dkms (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763017
Title:
package
It doesn't seem, that vdradmin-am changes its behavior until 11.04 will be
released:
http://projects.vdr-developer.org/issues/626
But within 11.04 this should work, perhaps the packet vdradmin-am could
ship with a config file, that changes the port. Or vdr is placed back to
the old port...
In
** Changed in: unity
Milestone: 3.8.12 = 3.8.14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755459
Title:
invisible window again
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I have this problem too.
Xubuntu 11.04 Final amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754595
Title:
Cannot create an empty file on the desktop
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I've dived into this a little bit more, and it's not fixable without
touching gedit's C code.
The bugreport is reproducible only if you keep the window focus on the
find/find-replace window while selecting the items, in that way, main
gedit window is then using ACTIVE colors, as it should do. If
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: unity
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: nux
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Sorry I forgot to subscribe this bug.
I will look up 35457 and see if I can assist.
This is not good for the radeon driver guys as the RS690M is a common
chip-set in a lot of netbooks ... the target audience of Unity in Ubuntu
11.4.
A lot of netbook users will be unable to use Unity next week on
Confirming this problem on my Acer Aspire laptop.
I tried the workaround mentioned somewhere
else, creating /etc/modprobe.d/ath9.conf with :
options ath9k nohwcrypt=1
This works! In my case, the laptop is fast
enough to do encryption in software, and
hybernation is not so important for me,
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766074
Title:
Unity/Compiz restarts when dragging files from the dash to Totem
--
mpt: could you give some input on this (see comment #12). The problem
is to do with the search+replace box over gedit stealing focus from
Gedit itself and therefore making Gedit appear in-active.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
exactly. and this is not fixable through the theme... so won't fix for
natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740864
Title:
Find result is too light gray
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
1 - 100 of 2092 matches
Mail list logo
