I found the same bug.
This is my graphic card (but I'm not sure how to check the driver version):
Video Card: NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX 960] (rev a1)
OS version: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
I think that those "funny" colors space is the video card memory that wasn't
refreshed. Maybe
This bug was fixed in the package software-properties - 0.96.24.13
---
software-properties (0.96.24.13) zesty; urgency=medium
* software-properties-gtk: also fix the backend code to set the gnome
debconf frontend, without which libgtk2-perl goes unused.
-- Steve Langasek
Public bug reported:
placeholder bug in case sysprof is seeded
** Affects: sysprof (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: In Progress
** Tags: upgrade-software-version zesty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
tests ran: 19, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/hainzel__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_23-14-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 20, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/rumford__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_23-04-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 10, failed: 1;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/pepe__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_23-22-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
You should be able to resolve this issue by running 'sudo apt -f
install' from a terminal and following the prompts.
I notice that it appears you installed the virtualbox package from the
commandline on 1 Apr; you should have already been prompted at that time
to disable secureboot. Did you see
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681351
Title:
Ubuntu GNOME does not install build-essential by default
To
Public bug reported:
The linux-goldfish (android derived linux kernel for Android touch
emulation on i386/armhf) package has not been regularly updated ands
contain a large number of unfixed security issues:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/linux-
goldfish.html
The Ubuntu
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1675870
package shim-signed 1.27+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error
exit status 1
** Summary changed:
- package shim-signed 1.27+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1
** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681178
Title:
The alternate installer does not install man
To manage
Thanks. This certainly shows that:
- your system has secureboot enabled
- signature enforcement was not disabled via MOK
I guess you have dkms modules present on your system, but these are non-
functional currently, probably because of the same issue of not being
shown the debconf prompt.
tests ran: 2, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/secchi__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_23-41-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or System
-> About Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Release:16.04
2) The version of the package you are using, via 'apt-cache policy
pkgname' or by checking in Software Center
konversation:
@Marc
I reviewed your proposed changes, and I really feel you should log an
error in the negative case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647389
Title:
Regression: Live migrations can
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2017-04-10 19:38 EDT---
Since we don't have an XFS developer in-house, does Canonical have any
suggestions on what kernel config options or debug facilities we can use in the
event this is reproducible?
--
You received this bug notification because
** Summary changed:
- Problem in network-manager-openvpn, openvpn fails during and after downloads.
+ Problem in nm-openvpn-service.c, openvpn connection fails after key
renegotiation because --auth-user-pass is passed with --auth-nocache.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
?
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: samba 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-72.93-generic 4.4.49
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-72-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 10 19:51:12
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681599
Title:
package samba 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.6 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed
There's an extra dependency that is not being installed by the package
manager. You need to install kleopatra:
sudo apt-get install kleopatra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93081
tests ran: 64, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/gonzo__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-59-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
So I've been using OpenVPN through the network-manager-openvpn package
integrated into the network manager GUI. I experienced an odd problem
where consistently, during or after downloading (in this case, I tested
by just downloading the kernel tarball from
Yes, 4.4.0.63 solved our OOM issues (and we had plenty after 4.4.0.59).
Ours were all headless server (bare metal and VMs) related though - no
desktop usage.
But I never experienced this issue with my home laptop either, but that
had lots of RAM and was only lightly used during that period - not
** Tags added: rls-aa-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681596
Title:
UpgradeStatus only checks for ubuntu-release-upgrader upgrades
To manage notifications about this bug go
Public bug reported:
The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding
xrdp. This problem was most recently seen with package version 0.6.1-2, the
problem page at
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/6f570872ed34832719c0b2180b1a39fe38459465
contains more details,
tests ran: 141, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/secchi__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-55-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: cloud-init
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499869
Title:
maas wily deployment to HP Proliant m400 arm64 server cartridge fails
Public bug reported:
In add_release_info of the generic ubuntu apport hook we can see the
following:
log = '/var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log'
if os.path.exists(log):
mtime = os.stat(log).st_mtime
human_mtime = time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d', time.gmtime(mtime))
delta =
Public bug reported:
After about 50m of uptime news.ycombinator.com stops working in Chromium:
news.ycombinator.com’s server's DNS address could not be found.
DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN
$ host news.ycombinator.com
Host news.ycombinator.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
This is a *regression* from
Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/448242
Committed:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=cc495a24656893c94031f491a3fed2bc94fe1850
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch:stable/ocata
commit cc495a24656893c94031f491a3fed2bc94fe1850
Author: Matt Riedemann
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1-generic/fozzie__4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1__2017-04-10_23-12-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 16, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/archytas__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-57-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 10, failed: 1;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/pepe__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-15-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1-generic/fozzie__4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1__2017-04-10_22-52-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1-generic/ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel__4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1__2017-04-10_22-55-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1-generic/ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel__4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1__2017-04-10_22-55-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 16, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/hainzel__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-45-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
2.4 works fine in neon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681426
Title:
labplot does not launch via desktop files/menus
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hello Katherine, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Lee, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Serg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ryan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello George, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ryan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Serg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Radoslav, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Fernando, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1-generic/amaura__4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1__2017-04-10_22-47-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Johan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ryan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Tore, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-90
-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel-lts-vivid (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: Robert Hooker (sarvatt) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506107
Title:
Bad webcam
tests ran: 6, failed: 1;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/archytas__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-07-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I believe the problem is that nothing ensures that the desktop
components which select and install software have access to a GUI
debconf frontend.
I think the proper solution is for each of the frontends to aptdaemon to
depend/recommend a suitable debconf frontend component (libgtk2-perl,
Here are updated logs without system76-driver-nvidia. The same issue
occurs.
** Attachment added: "dist-upgrade.tar.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1681566/+attachment/4859890/+files/dist-upgrade.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification
tests ran: 19, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/secchi__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_21-49-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Fernando, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667831
Title:
cloud-init dependency for open-vm-tools service
To manage
Hello Ryan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Ryan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Radoslav, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Johan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-proposed
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags added: block-proposed
** Description changed:
This bug is for tracking the upload package. This
bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.
For an explanation of the
tests ran: 6, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/hainzel__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_21-54-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The steps outlined in the initial bug report reliably (100%) reproduce the
problem for me on Ubuntu 16.04, it is tested in different Environments (1xAMD,
ca. 10xIntel).
Here's the short way to get there:
- Install a basic Ubuntu 16.04 Server
- apt-get install virt-manager (installing the GUI
** Changed in: gnome-terminal
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
** Changed in: gnome-terminal
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681585
Title:
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/rumford__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-25-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Katherine, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Tore, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lee, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ryan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello George, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Serg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Serg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Test case that demonstrates the issue:
$ mkdir -p
~/really/really/really/really/l/directory/
$ touch
~/really/really/really/really/l/directory/foo
$ ls
...
the terminal shrinks and goes into a loop and is
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/onza__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-15-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://github.com/libLAS/libLAS/pull/120
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675604
Title:
liblas-dev lacks pkgconfig file
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
tests ran: 2, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1-generic/gonzo__4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1__2017-04-10_22-05-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/security-signoff
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679678
Title:
linux: 4.8.0-47.50 -proposed tracker
To
This bug was fixed in the package epiphany-browser - 3.24.1-0ubuntu1
---
epiphany-browser (3.24.1-0ubuntu1) zesty; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1681535)
-- Jeremy Bicha Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:07:22 -0400
** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
** Description changed:
This is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769898. I see this
on 17.04 with gnome3/wayland. For example, if I edit a file using vim
deep in a directory and save the file, the size of the terminal changes
(as seen with 'stty size'). There are many different
** Changed in: binutils
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542979
Title:
ftbfs on s390x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
101 - 200 of 769 matches
Mail list logo