[Bug 1419338] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in pango_attr_list_unref()

2016-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
Obsolete. No idea when this was fixed, but I'm using v1.2.3 which runs bog stable. Closed. ** Changed in: pcmanfm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 968759] Re: adobe-flashplugin 11.2.202.228-0lucid1freezes firefox display - crashes some webkit programs (depends on cpu)

2016-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
Hopefully, Marius. This despotic attitude of Adobe people is simply disgusting, as it's showing here. BTW, why "Fix Released" in Debian? Trying to crack a good joke?? NO FIX WAS EVER RELEASED. Period. Bart was right that the Debian people cannot do anything about it, as "upstream ain't giving

[Bug 968759] Re: adobe-flashplugin 11.2.202.228-0lucid1freezes firefox display - crashes some webkit programs (depends on cpu)

2016-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
strike 'Back in 2012, ' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968759 Title: adobe-flashplugin 11.2.202.228-0lucid1freezes firefox display - crashes some webkit programs (depends on cpu)

[Bug 1543919] Re: Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)

2016-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
** Summary changed: - (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)? + Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1543919] Re: (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)?

2016-02-09 Thread A. Eibach
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543919 Title: (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main

[Bug 1543919] Re: (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)?

2016-02-09 Thread A. Eibach
** Tags added: bitesize -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543919 Title: (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)? To manage notifications about

[Bug 658960] Re: add "sudo" before apt-get autoremove in warning

2016-02-09 Thread A. Eibach
>Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. >while it should give the warning as >Use 'sudo apt-get autoremove' to remove them It NOT that simple. There should be made a case decision: - Are we really sudo'ing? - Are we working directly under root, i. e. the shell with the hash prompt? In the

[Bug 1543919] [NEW] (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)?

2016-02-09 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: (This is a sort of RfC. ) I have a PC that still has the good old PCI ports, but I am 100% sure that the active use of EISA dates back yet more 10 years. In other words, boards that _only_ support EISA date back 25 years now, while those that provide *one* EISA slot date

[Bug 1543919] Re: (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)?

2016-02-09 Thread A. Eibach
** Summary changed: - (Wishlist) Change EISA support to M (modular)? + (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1543919] Re: (Wishlist) Remove EISA support from main kernel image and make it M (modular)?

2016-02-09 Thread A. Eibach
Why "Incomplete"? There's nothing to supply. I simply need some maintainer's/kernel team's/iuser's feedback on this. Funny enough that even if I muzzled that bot, "New" still gets auto-changed to "Incomplete", this time even without an explanation. Brad, let your bots behave a little more

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-02-08 Thread A. Eibach
Nothing to do ?? I beg to differ! kernel.org #111901 is a kind of RfC whether CRS usage with old hardware should be levitated or whether users are---even in future---entitled to boot their < 4.4.0 kernels with pci=nocrs. And as the forced enabling of CRS was causing the problems that Sergey

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-02-08 Thread A. Eibach
Besides, about your "fixed upstream": I think it was entirely accidental. Something got modified in PCI handling, and abracadabra, it made old hardware work again. But as fas as I could read the code fix, it didn't look as if Sergey's and mine hardware was actually targeted. We were LUCKY that

[Bug 1537895] Re: Please include poppler-glib-demo tool in standard package

2016-02-05 Thread A. Eibach
>It's not useful on a normal system since it's for debugging Depends on point of view. :) *As long as* everything is still working fine, there is no need for that tool. But once evince goes all wonky with a certain PDF, it's the best tool to use and NOT (as most users do) put the entire blame

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-02-05 Thread A. Eibach
Guessed so. Oleg did a marvellous job in figuring that out. That was not easy-peasy by any means. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536397 Title: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-02-05 Thread A. Eibach
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #111901 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111901 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111901 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-02-04 Thread A. Eibach
Oleg, huge thanks for your hard work!! Ты чудо! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536397 Title: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1540713] Re: Tools drop-down menu displays as all empty (3.18.2)

2016-02-02 Thread A. Eibach
Lubuntu + Openbox + LXDE. I think Unity would be a little too much for my hardware... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540713 Title: Tools drop-down menu displays as all empty

[Bug 1540715] [NEW] scrot not working via hotkey if drop-down menu of source window is activated

2016-02-01 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: I've just discovered this bug when I was (desperately) trying to document an issue in gedit which showed here a certain drop-down menu as blank, no menu items. scrot ALWAYS goes on strike when you have hotkey set to PrtSc (for example) and you want to document a bug in a

[Bug 1540713] Re: Tools drop-down menu displays as all empty (3.18.2)

2016-02-01 Thread A. Eibach
Just discovered yet another bug. Wasn't able to make a screenshot of the problem because drop-down menu had to be SHOWN to you. However, for scrot, this will cause the hotkey to get blocked!! ksnapshot came to mind. (I don't use KDE, but this ksnapshot tool is simply excellent.) ** Summary

[Bug 1540713] [NEW] Tools drop-down menu all empty (3.18.2)

2016-02-01 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: (Before I mention anything about the bug, just wanted to make sure to leave some BIG PRAISE to the gedit dev team for 3.18.2. Main Menu was absent throughout in pre-3.18 and it was the horror, now everything feels pefect again. Thank you.) This report is for gedit 3.18.2

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-01-28 Thread A. Eibach
Christopher, it's NOT that simple in this case. I can confirm that 4.3.4 fails and that 4.4.0 works. But there is definitely nothing in the mainline that might give a chance to find the "offending" patch, that broke it. All we _could_ probably do is test 4.4.rc1 ... 4.4rc8. But that might

[Bug 439784] Re: Error: Invalid environment block

2016-01-27 Thread A. Eibach
hah. Maybe this is not a "bug" after all... Got this as well, and ended up at this LP bug...BUT...there was something peculiar. $ head -1 /boot/grubenv did NOT cleanly display "GRUB Environment Block" but had a few characters garbled in that line. I remember this from IDE times, with

[Bug 1537915] Re: libgtk-3-common: Adwaita theme dependency not recognized

2016-01-26 Thread A. Eibach
No problem, can do. user@mybuntubox~$:~$ sudo apt-get --no-install-recommends install libgtk-3-common=3.18.6-1ubuntu1 [sudo] password for user: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. The following

[Bug 1537915] Re: libgtk-3-common: Adwaita theme dependency not recognized

2016-01-26 Thread A. Eibach
Heheh, Manfred, I like that. You're trying to prove in the end that it's a PEBKAC case after all. But still we can agree it is none...that is, STILL. :-) andy@andy-lubuntubox:~$ apt-get --simulate --no-install-recommends install libgtk-3-common=3.18.6-1ubuntu1 adwaita-icon-theme NOTE: This is

[Bug 1537915] Re: libgtk-3-common: Adwaita theme dependency misdetected because of missing libgtk-3-bin

2016-01-26 Thread A. Eibach
** Summary changed: - libgtk-3-common: Adwaita theme dependency not recognized + libgtk-3-common: Adwaita theme dependency misdetected because of missing libgtk-3-bin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1537915] [NEW] libgtk-3-common: Adwaita theme dependency not recognized

2016-01-25 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: Pre-note: due to severe bugs, I had to go down from 3.19.x back to 3.18.6. I think the following content will speak for itself: user@mybuntubox:~$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall adwaita-icon-theme Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state

[Bug 1537895] [NEW] Please include poppler-glib-demo tool in standard package

2016-01-25 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: I'm having an occasional issue with evince, and since the issue is clearly related to the PDF engine underneath which it uses (*this), I got a tip to run a PDF directly with 'poppler-glib-demo' in the 'poppler-demos' package. However, this tip was NOT suitable for Ubuntu, as

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-01-23 Thread A. Eibach
@Sergey, to find the actual bugger we'd have to test somewhere _between_ 4.3.5 and 4.3.9[99]. However, there was nothing like that available for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-01-23 Thread A. Eibach
>4.3.0-040300-generic = pata_amd, pata_acpi error >4.3.4-040304-generic = pata_amd, pata_acpi error Confirmed! > I tried to load Xubuntu 15.10 installation LiveCD from USB Stick. It was loaded normally. (4.2.0-16-generic) Aha, _that_ worked? Well, my 4.2.x was exactly ... let me see ...

[Bug 1536397] Re: [nForce2] pata_amd pata_acpi can't load

2016-01-23 Thread A. Eibach
Many, many thanks Sergey!! This problem really fussed me as I thought it's my hardware (as usual). They must really have fixed a huge bug in 4.4.0. For the Ubuntu folks here, note that 4.3.4 from Kernel Mainline will still NOT work. (neither does 4.3.0-7, which made it into main repo only 2 days

[Bug 1510364] Re: LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below or at task pane

2015-10-28 Thread A. Eibach
So here we go again. http://git.lxde.org/gitweb/?p=lxde/lxpanel.git;a=commit;h=bd6533554418767438eee066c3d76efe54fc1c64 Note, it's not exactly the commit that turned 'flawed' to 'fixed'; the crucial file in any case is launchtaskbar.c . That's where the fix was done in; but Andriy has fixed

[Bug 1510364] Re: LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below or at task pane

2015-10-27 Thread A. Eibach
--- GIT version works! ! --- (compiled it, sick and tired of it as I was) Now please tell me why the Ubuntu packagers have slept again with their eyes open and not used THAT version, distributing the flawed version instead?! -- You

[Bug 1510364] Re: LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below or at task pane

2015-10-27 Thread A. Eibach
"Ubuntu is essentially Debian Unstable, so you'd want to complain to their packagers." HAHA, I love that phrase, especially the first half! :) YMMD Seriously though, no problem. 1. "Upstream" would have been an idea, but I haven't found anything lxde/lxpanel related on GNOME Bugzilla. Pretty

[Bug 1510364] [NEW] LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below task pane

2015-10-26 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: This is not easy to explain, but it can be reproduced. Running Lubuntu Wily FINAL with lxpanel 0.8.1-1ubuntu2 . Reproduction of the bug: - Have Task Bar at bottom. If you haven't, set it to screen bottom at first.  - Make sure you have a few task items, i. e. programs

[Bug 1510364] Re: LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is at or below task pane

2015-10-26 Thread A. Eibach
** Summary changed: - LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below task pane + LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is at or below task pane ** Summary changed: - LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is at or

[Bug 1510364] Re: LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below or at task pane

2015-10-26 Thread A. Eibach
This is interesting.. https://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/bugs/758/ Sounds very closely related to me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510364 Title: LXpanel might auto-restart when

[Bug 1510364] Re: LXpanel might auto-restart when RMB is pressed and mouse cursor is below task pane

2015-10-26 Thread A. Eibach
Oh, it *IS* a crash!! I installed lxpanel-DBG and now I could figure out where the crash happened: Starting program: /usr/bin/lxpanel --log 5 --profile Lubuntu [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [New Thread

[Bug 1460192] Re: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until after login and logout.

2015-10-23 Thread A. Eibach
FIXED! Definitely. Thanks to the dev team. (using wily FINAL, no beta crud) ** Changed in: lxappearance (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1460192] Re: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until after login and logout.

2015-10-23 Thread A. Eibach
^^ I wrote this above in "Comment on this change" but it appeared here. Tough luck. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460192 Title: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until

[Bug 1460192] Re: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until after login and logout.

2015-10-23 Thread A. Eibach
Wasn't aware that I have the permission to do that, but it worked :P -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460192 Title: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until after login and

[Bug 1460192] Re: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until after login and logout.

2015-10-23 Thread A. Eibach
Fix now available in Wily FINAL version (out on Oct 22, 2015) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460192 Title: new themes in lxappareance does not apply until after login and logout.

[Bug 1504078] Re: [4.2.0-15.18] broken sound: 'output devices' not detected

2015-10-12 Thread A. Eibach
Ok, but why "Invalid" and not "Fix Released"? (just curious :)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504078 Title: [4.2.0-15.18] broken sound: 'output devices' not detected To manage

[Bug 1369273] Re: gnucash crashed with ImportError in /usr/share/gnucash/python/init.py: No module named gnucash

2015-09-17 Thread A. Eibach
Reinhard, you did the right thing in assuming that python-gnucash is always present. However, this is only legitimate because Sebastien made it an *essential* dependency (see comment 20). So it wouldn't have been a legit fix unless these two things get _combined_. Good work both of you. --

[Bug 1434986] Re: Not working network connection after boot

2015-09-17 Thread A. Eibach
...which has even been marked 'Invalid' as now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434986 Title: Not working network connection after boot To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1489154] Re: NetworkManager does not start / fails to start

2015-09-17 Thread A. Eibach
TBH, I only enabled -proposed because openbox 3.6.0 runs so well and because of major and severe bugs with old openbox and lxappearance. This was so unbearable that I chose to upgrade to (allegedly "unstable") v3.6.0 ... and lo' and behold, haven't run into problems for weeks. -- You received

[Bug 1263540] Re: Apt-get reports NO_PUBKEY gpg error for keys that are present in trusted.gpg.

2015-09-15 Thread A. Eibach
AND TO EVERYBODY: Please do NOT confuse the line sudo apt-key update with sudo apt-get update Always make sure you're referring to the one or the other. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1263540] Re: Apt-get reports NO_PUBKEY gpg error for keys that are present in trusted.gpg.

2015-09-15 Thread A. Eibach
Ok, nuked /etc/apt/trusted.gpg and rebuilt is using sudo apt-key update YAY!! That finally caused the error message of the very key 40976EAF437D05B5 to disappear. Good riddance. :P -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1263540] Re: Apt-get reports NO_PUBKEY gpg error for keys that are present in trusted.gpg.

2015-09-12 Thread A. Eibach
(comment 7) I can't believe it! THAT'S MINE!!! 40976EAF437D05B5 As I thought that it could even be related to some local repo not updating their stuff in time (yes this happens sometimes in minor form), I chenged to fr. and ch. domains sequentially. To no avail at all. Thanks for the idea to

[Bug 1489154] Re: NetworkManager does not start / fails to start

2015-09-05 Thread A. Eibach
>For reference, the way to upgrade NetworkManager is the following: > >sudo apt-get install -t wily-proposed network-manager libnm0 libnm-glib4 >libnm-util2 gir1.2-networkmanager-1.0 Mathieu, though this ssounds all pretty structured and logical, I think I know where these issues come from.

[Bug 1489154] Re: NetworkManager does not start / fails to start

2015-08-28 Thread A. Eibach
JFTR, mine is 2.45.3-1 . (libglibmm @ 2.44.0-1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489154 Title: NetworkManager does not start / fails to start To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1489154] Re: NetworkManager does not start / fails to start

2015-08-28 Thread A. Eibach
Importance=Critical --- YES! No network, no internet - zilch. That is, if you choose to use this broken version. Any developer around? Please, anyone don't you go annoying me with apport reports (I hate apport), you will only get these few gdb lines from me, which ought to be enough to find the

[Bug 1434986] Re: Not working network connection after boot

2015-08-28 Thread A. Eibach
Confirming with 1.0.4. But WFM with 0.19.10.0. BTW, instead of funny guessing, just do ps -ef | grep NetworkManager /usr/sbin/NetworkManager *MUST* be running if you want to access the Internet. 1.0.4 did NOT run. When checking /var/log/*.crash files, I found a network-manager-related crash

[Bug 1489154] Re: NetworkManager does not start / fails to start

2015-08-28 Thread A. Eibach
OK, so my bug must be in ./NetworkManager/libnm/nm-device-wifi.c in the function as follows: prepare_scan_options (GVariant *options) { .. if (!options) 284 variant = g_variant_new_array (G_VARIANT_TYPE ({sv}), NULL, 0); 285 else { 286

[Bug 1484289] [NEW] hdparm 9.43 - 9.45+ update request

2015-08-12 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: This is, in fact, NOT a real bug report. However, as Manfred asked me to report it here anyway (https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdparm/+question/270310 ) I will do so. (Let alone because the genuine Debian OS is also still at 9.43...) Yes, (*)Ubuntu is VERY

[Bug 1304128] Re: Both light-locker and xscreensaver enabled after upgrade

2015-08-10 Thread A. Eibach
No, you didn't get the point. ToZ does not want that the install procedure forces light-locker/screensaver on the users by default, thinking they could need it. There should be a way to select either of them, both of them, or none of them at all. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1468529] Re: lxappearance segmentation fault

2015-08-10 Thread A. Eibach
Here's mine: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxappearance/+bug/1469276 If you can't resist, mark it duplicate, I don't care. However, this bug contains two solutions: hackish: downgrade lxappearance-obconf-plugin which is the actual culprit non-hackish: upgrade openbox to 3.6.0 --

[Bug 1363430] Re: [mesa] firefox: intel_do_flush_locked failed: Invalid argument

2015-07-26 Thread A. Eibach
Andreas (#4), thanks for speaking up. However, I need to do my stuff even though I have no system at the moment. So the kernel update can't fix things for me, as I am running off a live cd (better than nothing). Still, it's really a bad bug that you have to REBOOT the machine to get things back

[Bug 172937] Re: SQUASHFS error while booting from live cd

2015-07-23 Thread A. Eibach
Reinald, this is VERY interesting what you've written! and found the diskless system serveral times hanging after a day or so with unrecoverable: This is exactly what I could witness on my live cd. It will work perfectly for one day, then these artifacts will come up. Whatever you're trying to

[Bug 1469276] Re: lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault

2015-07-10 Thread A. Eibach
Got it! Just uploaded about 10 hours ago. However, after enabling wily-proposed for openbox in /etc/apt/sources.list, I had to use $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade since the ordinary upgrade option did not install the new openbox. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1469276] Re: lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault

2015-07-08 Thread A. Eibach
** Also affects: lxappearance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: I just don't understand it. Towards 0.2.2-1, lxappearance-obconf plugin 0.2.2-2 only seems to have undergone a cosmetical change (i. e. information update). But lxappearance

[Bug 1469276] Re: lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault

2015-07-08 Thread A. Eibach
SUCCESS! Managed to fix it myself. However, I had to install openbox 3.6.0 first (yet marked unstable) and the new dependencies (since lxappearance-obconf 0.2.2.3) libobrender31 and libobt4. Works now, but should not be closed, as openbox 3.6.0 is still a little futuristic ;) -- You received

[Bug 1469276] Re: lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault

2015-07-08 Thread A. Eibach
3.6 in wily? That's a great news, thank you!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1469276 Title: lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault To manage

[Bug 1469276] [NEW] lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1.-1 to segfault

2015-06-26 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: I just don't understand it. Towards 0.2.2-1, lxappearance-obconf plugin 0.2.2-2 only seems to have undergone a cosmetical change (i. e. information update). But lxappearance 0.6.1-1 works perfectly with 0.2.2-1 here on Wily. However lxappearance 0.6.1-1 with plugin version

[Bug 1469276] Re: lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault

2015-06-26 Thread A. Eibach
** Summary changed: - lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1.-1 to segfault + lxappearance-obconf plugin causes lxappearance 0.6.1-1 to segfault -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1460192] Re: lubuntu dark panel does not apply a dark panel without logout

2015-06-26 Thread A. Eibach
Does not only happen with dark panels. Darklooks *IS* my default, and just to see some action I changed it in some ugly one, e. g. HighContrast. No effect. But wait...after logout and logging back in, theme showed up as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1430593] Re: package khelpcenter (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/kcmhtmlsearch.mo', which is also in package kde-l10n-th 4:4.10.97

2015-05-03 Thread A. Eibach
Same ugly nonsense when attempting to install kde-cli-tools and kde-cli- tools-data. This is THAI LANG SUPPORT problem. I had to do a $ sudo apt-get remove kde-l10n-th to fix it on my side. However, this definitely should not happen at all. And why only for Thai support? There must be

[Bug 1376051] Re: gpartedbin crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2015-04-25 Thread A. Eibach
to comment 18: I am not so sure if the fix inside gparted will be enough. I remember that even here on Vivid I had to manually update to libglibmm-2.4-1c2a (version 2.44). The reason for this is that the significant fix was not applied yet in 2.43.x, but in 2.44 :

[Bug 1437070] Re: chromium-browser crashes with SIGILL if CPU does not support SSE2

2015-03-26 Thread A. Eibach
** Description changed: My CPU does not support SSE2, this is a fact. - And as far as I knew, there was nowhere a *requirement* listed that for the use of Chromium, a SSE2-capable CPU would be mandatory. + And as far as I knew (unless I missed something) for the use of Chromium on Linux,

[Bug 1437070] [NEW] chromium-browser crashes with SIGILL if CPU does not support SSE2

2015-03-26 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: My CPU does not support SSE2, this is a fact. And as far as I knew, there was nowhere a *requirement* listed that for the use of Chromium, a SSE2-capable CPU would be mandatory. For instance, old(er) Athlon XP machines support SSE, but not SSE2. I've run a DEBUG build of

[Bug 1431414] Re: For creating launchers, PcManFM relies on xfce4-panel, while LXDE uses lxpanel

2015-03-13 Thread A. Eibach
** Attachment removed: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1431414/+attachment/4343042/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1431414] [NEW] For creating launchers, PcManFM relies on xfce4-panel, while LXDE uses lxpanel

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: First of all, I do not really know whether ths is a PCManFM issue at all...maybe it's distro-specific enough to blame the individual packagers... Minor issue, no big deal. Reproduction: - Preferably use LXDE/Openbox (which is the default on Lubuntu here) - Launch PCManFM

[Bug 1431414] RelatedPackageVersions.txt

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
apport information ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431414/+attachment/4343043/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1431414] Re: For creating launchers, PcManFM relies on xfce4-panel, while LXDE uses lxpanel

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
screenshot here: ** Attachment added: createlink_menuentry_pcmanfm.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1431414/+attachment/4343086/+files/createlink_menuentry_pcmanfm.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1431414] Re: For creating launchers, PcManFM relies on xfce4-panel, while LXDE uses lxpanel

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
I do not see the open with create launcher with panel in my version of vivid. OK. A screenshot might clear things up, to see WHERE exactly this is active: (this was tricky to do; just learned that open menus _cannot_ be handled with scrot; had to use ksnapshot) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1431414] Dependencies.txt

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431414/+attachment/4343041/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431414

[Bug 1431414] ProcEnviron.txt

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431414/+attachment/4343042/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431414

[Bug 1431414] Re: For creating launchers, PcManFM relies on xfce4-panel, while LXDE uses lxpanel

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected gnome3-ppa third-party-packages vivid ** Description changed: First of all, I do not really know whether ths is a PCManFM issue at all...maybe it's distro-specific enough to blame the individual packagers... Minor issue, no big deal.

[Bug 1431414] Udisks_dump.txt

2015-03-12 Thread A. Eibach
apport information ** Attachment added: Udisks_dump.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431414/+attachment/4343044/+files/Udisks_dump.txt ** Attachment removed: Udisks_dump.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1431414/+attachment/4343044/+files/Udisks_dump.txt --

[Bug 1424362] Re: no permissions to install packages in vivid daily lubuntu beta 1

2015-03-03 Thread A. Eibach
As of March 03, 2015. there is nothing like Beta 2. Title changed appropriately. ** Summary changed: - no permissions to install packages in vivid daily lubuntu beta 2 + no permissions to install packages in vivid daily lubuntu beta 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1369273] Re: gnucash crashed with ImportError in /usr/share/gnucash/python/init.py: No module named gnucash

2015-02-17 Thread A. Eibach
I second that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1369273 Title: gnucash crashed with ImportError in /usr/share/gnucash/python/init.py: No module named gnucash To manage notifications

[Bug 1369273] Re: gnucash crashed with ImportError in /usr/share/gnucash/python/init.py: No module named gnucash

2015-02-17 Thread A. Eibach
This is for 2.6.3. Wish I knew why 2.6.4 has been released _without_ fixing this No module bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1369273 Title: gnucash crashed with ImportError in

[Bug 1297624] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref()

2015-02-12 Thread A. Eibach
Added RH bug (from my duplicate, which is likely to be disregarded unlike this one here) ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1167132 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167132 ** Also affects: fedora via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167132 Importance: Unknown

[Bug 1297624] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref()

2015-02-12 Thread A. Eibach
** Package changed: fedora = ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297624 Title: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1415648] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref()

2015-02-12 Thread A. Eibach
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1297117 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297117 See also bug 1297624 (public) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415648 Title: pcmanfm

[Bug 1297624] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref()

2015-02-12 Thread A. Eibach
thanks for the information type change! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297624 Title: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref() To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1358486] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref()

2015-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1297117 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297117 #1297717 *IS* private, yes. Maybe we should finally convince the Apport folks to make bugs *public* by default, as this is a mayor annoyance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1420998] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref() (bug in libfm core)

2015-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1297624 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297624 Yes, dammit, this bug MIGHT be a duplicate. But as we cannot look into that damn bug because the silly person who sent it in marked the bug as PRIVATE, it is at least better to have something to look

[Bug 1420998] [NEW] pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref() (bug in libfm core)

2015-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: Assigned to libfm, as this is definitely an internal core problem, nothing visual. I don't know what I did to trigger the bug, I think I just clicked on the next file in my folder and pcmanfm was no more. BTW, please also note that the configuration file in Lubuntu is not

[Bug 1420998] Re: pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_mime_type_ref() (bug in libfm core)

2015-02-11 Thread A. Eibach
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1297624 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297624 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1167132 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167132 ** Also affects: fedora via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167132 Importance:

[Bug 1419338] [NEW] pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in pango_attr_list_unref()

2015-02-07 Thread A. Eibach
Public bug reported: While messing around with my partitions and the directory tree contained within, I got this crash. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: pcmanfm 1.2.3-1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.18.0-9.10-generic 3.18.2 Uname: Linux 3.18.0-9-generic i686

[Bug 1300215] Re: Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_i965.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

2015-02-03 Thread A. Eibach
This is a horrible bug, and no one wants to seem to fix it. Here's my version: (Precondition: installed libvdpau-va-gl1, as it was not there.) Thanks for the VDPAU_DRIVER tip, very appreciated. ~$ export VDPAU_DRIVER=va_gl ~$ cd /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri ~$ ls -l total 91924 -rw-r--r-- 1

[Bug 1393067] Re: totem 3.14

2015-02-02 Thread A. Eibach
I hope you will soon. Current totem is horrid, feels like a software for total illiterates. Everything feels so crippled: no more split screen w/playlist, only most basic preferences and - worse - no menu bar at all. And 3.15.x doesn't even start here on Vivid, but just segfaults. (See other

[Bug 1376051] Re: gpartedbin crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2014-12-14 Thread A. Eibach
Bingo, because I can confirm FOR SURE that 0.19.0-1-ubuntu1 does NOT include the fix for this _critical_ bug here at all! Left to say, I'm sick and tired of finding the 0.19.0somethingbuildsomething crap everywhere. *It* *is* *simply* *unuseable*. Full stop. I had to move my butt to

[Bug 1376051] Re: gpartedbin crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2014-12-14 Thread A. Eibach
OK...I take it back... The actual reason was that IDIOTIC and illogical naming. I will never understand why a _fully published_ version of gparted in Utopic is called 0.19.0-1___build___1 and your still somewhat unofficial PPA-only version is called 0.19.0-1-___ubuntu___1. Normally, the

[Bug 1364630] Re: init: Error while reading from descriptor: Broken pipe

2014-11-20 Thread A. Eibach
Added upstart to affected software. Reason: mentioned in dupe #1389044. ** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364630

[Bug 1364630] Re: init: Error while reading from descriptor: Broken pipe

2014-11-14 Thread A. Eibach
Wish I knew *WHERE* this error while reading message comes from! init can mean quite a lot. On Ubuntu flavors, /sbin/init is actually init from upstart package. But just FWIW, I've grep'd recursively (-ir) for both broken pipe and error while reading messages. None there. So this init: Error

[Bug 1364630] Re: init: Error while reading from descriptor: Broken pipe

2014-11-14 Thread A. Eibach
Wait... Found a match on this error message in 'io.c' which is part of libnih, which on its part is needed by /sbin/init. So if anyone wants to debug the reason of this, he should start debugging libnih (even adding a printf will do to see what's going on) and check what (illegal?) parameter

[Bug 1384416] Re: coreutils 'info command' broken

2014-11-02 Thread A. Eibach
Nice ... just wondering if this fix wouldn't have to be rolled back again soon since roughly 100 tools have been recompiled after the recent change(s)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1376051] Re: gpartedbin crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2014-10-27 Thread A. Eibach
Additional info: Even though 0.18.x dumps out a MYRIAD of debug, warning AND error messages when started from console, it works fine. It was my life-saver when I urgently had to change a partition size. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1376051] Re: gpartedbin crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2014-10-27 Thread A. Eibach
Uhhh, that's the 1build1 I have that too. (or better: got it installed by upgrading from Trusty to Utopic (final) Unfortunately 0.19.1 is not available as a package for either Ubuntu nor its flavors. I've looked everywhere, including PPAs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

  1   2   >