[Bug 1780334] Re: kubernetes - new ubuntu package

2020-04-01 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780334 Title: kubernetes - new ubuntu package To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1780334] Re: kubernetes - new ubuntu package

2018-08-27 Thread Adam Stokes
Thanks Steve, was a little rusty. I've made changes and did a new upload. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780334 Title:

[Bug 1780334] Re: kubernetes - new ubuntu package

2018-08-23 Thread Adam Stokes
This got rejected originally, but it sounds like we're ok uploading the package in its current state? If so, do I need to reupload? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780334 Title:

[Bug 1780334] [NEW] kubernetes - new ubuntu package

2018-07-05 Thread Adam Stokes
has been blocked to make way for this Ubuntu specific kubernetes package. PPA: https://code.launchpad.net/~adam-stokes/+archive/ubuntu/gangstar ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Status

[Bug 1771034] Re: fails to find bridge and storage pool when installing locally

2018-06-12 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: conjure-up (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771034 Title: fails to find bridge and storage pool when installing locally To

[Bug 1771034] Re: fails to find bridge and storage pool when installing locally

2018-05-14 Thread Adam Stokes
You wan to run `lxd.migrate` first, https://docs.conjure-up.io/devel/en /#users-of-lxd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771034 Title: fails to find bridge and storage pool when

[Bug 1712431] Re: sphere controller stores OVA files locally

2017-08-22 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: conjure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1712431 Title: sphere controller stores OVA files locally To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1669507] Re: Remove juju-core from artful

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Bugs for addressing the rdepends: charm - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/charm/+bug/1706766 charm-tools - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/charm-tools/+bug/1706767 conjure-up - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/conjure-up/+bug/1706734 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1706766] [NEW] remove charm from artful

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: charm is now releasing as a snap as the primary means of consumption. Please remove this package from the archive. ** Affects: charm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1706767] [NEW] please remove charm-tools from artful

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: charm-tools is now releasing as a snap as the primary means of consumption. Please remove this package from the archive. ** Affects: charm-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1706734] [NEW] remove conjure-up from artful

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: conjure-up is now releasing as a snap as the primary means of consumption. Please remove this package from the archive. rdepends also being asked for removal: bigdata - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bigdata/+bug/1706732 openstack -

[Bug 1706733] [NEW] remove openstack package in artful

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: This package is no longer required as conjure-up packages all spell requirements in it's snap packaging. ** Affects: openstack (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1706732] [NEW] remove bigdata from artful

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: This package is no longer required by conjure-up as our spells are now maintained inside the conjure-up snap itself. ** Affects: bigdata (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1687126] Re: sosreport does not collect /sys/fs/pstore contents

2017-05-11 Thread Adam Stokes
Also adding reference to https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/1008 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687126 Title: sosreport does not collect /sys/fs/pstore contents To manage

[Bug 1677417] Re: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/conjure-up.conf breaks apt on host system

2017-04-03 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: conjure-up (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677417 Title: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/conjure-up.conf breaks apt on host system

[Bug 1657152] [NEW] snapd 2.21 on 14.04 does not install systemd file properly

2017-01-17 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: You can reproduce by running the following on Trusty with snapd 2.21 sudo snap install conjure-up --edge --classic Will result in this error: ubuntu@darthbawlz:~$ sudo snap install conjure-up --classic --edge error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Start snap

[Bug 1656580] Re: snapd on trusty fails to install snap with error loading shared library

2017-01-17 Thread Adam Stokes
Marking incomplete as I can longer reproduce with snapd 2.21~14.04.2 package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656580 Title: snapd on trusty fails to install snap with error loading

[Bug 1656580] Re: snapd on trusty fails to install snap with error loading shared library

2017-01-17 Thread Adam Stokes
During my tests I upgraded to snapd 14.04.2 and the libapparmor error was not shown and I was able to do a: $ snap install htop and can access /snap/bin/htop I am having another issue with 14.04.2 where conjure-up systemd service is failing to start Ill file another bug for that though

[Bug 1656580] [NEW] snapd on trusty fails to install snap with error loading shared library

2017-01-14 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: When attempting to snap install from the proposed package in Trusty I hit this error: Jan 14 20:27:23 darthbawlz snap[1796]: /usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine: error while loading shared libraries: libapparmor.so.1: failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied The

[Bug 1655369] Re: cannot use the platform plug with a snap in 'classic' confinement

2017-01-11 Thread Adam Stokes
Seeing the same issue, this is the branch im working from: https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/tree/snapcraft- updates/snapcraft It could be I'm just doing something wrong so any advice is much appreciated ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received

[Bug 1576411] Re: UTF-8 is not very well supported inside snaps

2016-08-09 Thread Adam Stokes
I had to workaround this issue as well for conjure-up by exporting LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 (https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure- up/tree/master/snapcraft). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1575906] Re: post processing fails to add ssh keypair

2016-06-06 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575906 Title: post processing fails to add ssh keypair To manage notifications

[Bug 1575800] Re: post processing neutron fails to configure network

2016-05-27 Thread Adam Stokes
I've done several tests using proposed and have had it successfully deploy openstack with neutron working and instances pingable out of the box. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1586131] Re: 'creds' keyerror when deploying openstack/bigdata

2016-05-27 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: conjure-up (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Description changed: + [Impact] + Any user using the latest Juju beta7 which changed the cloud listing from lxd to localhost + + [Test] I did the following: apt install conjure-up #per instructions -

[Bug 1586131] [NEW] 'creds' keyerror when deploying openstack/bigdata

2016-05-26 Thread Adam Stokes
) File "/usr/share/conjure-up/conjure/controllers/cloud.py", line 39, in finish return self.app.controllers['newcloud'].render(cloud) File "/usr/share/conjure-up/conjure/controllers/newcloud.py", line 118, in render creds, UnboundLocalError: local variable 'creds' r

[Bug 1576412] Re: package does not use released charms

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Stokes
Tested and made sure OpenStack is now coming up using the latest released charms from the charmstore. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1581645] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial

2016-05-17 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581645 Title: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1581645] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial

2016-05-17 Thread Adam Stokes
** Also affects: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581645 Title: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial To manage

[Bug 1575800] Re: post processing neutron fails to configure network

2016-04-29 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575800 Title: post processing neutron fails to configure network To

[Bug 1575906] Re: post processing fails to add ssh keypair

2016-04-29 Thread Adam Stokes
** Also affects: openstack (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1576412] Re: package does not use released charms

2016-04-29 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576412 Title: package does not use released charms To manage

[Bug 1576412] Re: package does not use released charms

2016-04-29 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: - openstack package should use the released charms from the charmstore - rather than openstack-charmers-next + [Impact] + All users wanting to deploy a production grade OpenStack via Juju bundles. + + [Test Case] + This basically uses the vetted 16.04 charms from

[Bug 1575906] Re: post processing fails to add ssh keypair

2016-04-29 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: - During post processing phase the ssh keypair is not properly imported - and at times an error is printed to the screen about unable to locate - any ssh keys to import. + [Impact] + Users wishing to ssh into their instances will fail to do so without manually importing

[Bug 1575800] Re: post processing neutron fails to configure network

2016-04-29 Thread Adam Stokes
** Also affects: openstack (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Description changed: - Once a deploy has completed using the OpenStack with Nova-LXD bundle - there are attempts made to

[Bug 1576412] [NEW] package does not use released charms

2016-04-28 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: openstack package should use the released charms from the charmstore rather than openstack-charmers-next ** Affects: openstack (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu

[Bug 1575377] Re: blank return strings from processing scripts cause json parse error

2016-04-28 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: conjure-up (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575377 Title: blank return strings from processing scripts cause json

[Bug 1575906] [NEW] post processing fails to add ssh keypair

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: During post processing phase the ssh keypair is not properly imported and at times an error is printed to the screen about unable to locate any ssh keys to import. ** Affects: openstack (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes

[Bug 1575800] [NEW] post processing neutron fails to configure network

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Stokes
and configured to work with neutron. The bug is currently a network is defined but not associated with any bridge from the host system. ** Affects: openstack (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu

[Bug 1567040] Re: openstack-install fails v0.99.27

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Stokes
Please try with conjure-up and open a separate bug if problem persists Thanks! ** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1546484] Re: openstack-install fails

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Stokes
You'll want to make sure you've: sudo openstack-install -u rm -rf ~/.cloud-install Then re-run the installer, please note that you do not have to define --openstack-release as Autopilot is already configured to use the appropriate version. Also note on 16.04 you'll want to use the new

[Bug 1575377] Re: blank return strings from processing scripts cause json parse error

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: - During parsing of results from post processing scripts that return a - JSON dictionary and error would occur if that JSON response was not - properly formatted or an empty string. + [Impact] + This will break any post processing script attempting to retry a invalid JSON

[Bug 1573176] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 for Xenial

2016-04-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Also tested on a separate system utilizing conjure-up and juju beta6 and saw no agent lost errors for bug 1572237 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573176 Title: [SRU] Juju 2.0 for

[Bug 1575377] [NEW] blank return strings from processing scripts cause json parse error

2016-04-26 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: During parsing of results from post processing scripts that return a JSON dictionary and error would occur if that JSON response was not properly formatted or an empty string. ** Affects: conjure-up (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes

[Bug 1306315] Re: juju-mongodb process hangs around after package removal

2016-04-04 Thread Adam Stokes
I honestly haven't ran into this for a long time. I think we can close this out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306315 Title: juju-mongodb process hangs around after package removal

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: The juju team is requesting an FFE for juju-core. Juju2 represents API changes and new features and bugfixes for juju. We are NOT requesting a place on any image for xenial. This FFE is intended to cover the acceptance of the updated juju-core package, as well as

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: The juju team is requesting an FFE for juju-core. Juju2 represents API changes and new features and bugfixes for juju. We are NOT requesting a place on any image for xenial. This FFE is intended to cover the acceptance of the updated juju-core package, as well as

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-30 Thread Adam Stokes
xnox, there is this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju- core/+bug/1547665 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-30 Thread Adam Stokes
xnox, there is this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju- core/+bug/1547665 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-24 Thread Adam Stokes
We are using juju-core package name now so there is no need for this packaging request :) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-24 Thread Adam Stokes
We are using juju-core package name now so there is no need for this packaging request :) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-24 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: conjure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-24 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: conjure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-24 Thread Adam Stokes
Also want to mention the openstack package as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-24 Thread Adam Stokes
Also want to mention the openstack package as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560315 Title: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560315 Title: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial To manage

[Bug 1561043] [NEW] [needs-packaging] bigdata

2016-03-23 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: This is the application wrapper around conjure to provide apt juju bundle installation for various big data solutions. URL: https://github.com/Ubuntu-Solutions-Engineering/bigdata-deb License: MIT Notes: This was blocked waiting on juju2 reaching the Xenial archives. The

[Bug 1561037] [NEW] [needs-packaging] conjure

2016-03-23 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: This is the application runtime for providing access to apt installable juju bundles. URL: https://github.com/Ubuntu-Solutions-Engineering/conjure License: MIT Notes: This was blocked waiting on juju2 reaching the Xenial archives. The PPA containing the package can be found

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: Juju 2.0 will be in xenial. We want to place juju 2.0-beta2 (or possibly beta3) in xenial for Ubuntu users to test. This branch introduces the juju2 package. lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/xenial/juju2/xenial-2.0-beta2 The juju team propose a new juju2 packages

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: Juju 2.0 will be in xenial. We want to place juju 2.0-beta2 (or possibly beta3) in xenial for Ubuntu users to test. This branch introduces the juju2 package. lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/xenial/juju2/xenial-2.0-beta2 The juju team propose a new juju2 packages

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: Juju 2.0 will be in xenial. We want to place juju 2.0-beta2 (or possibly beta3) in xenial for Ubuntu users to test. This branch introduces the juju2 package. lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/xenial/juju2/xenial-2.0-beta2 The juju team propose a new juju2 packages

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: Juju 2.0 will be in xenial. We want to place juju 2.0-beta2 (or possibly beta3) in xenial for Ubuntu users to test. This branch introduces the juju2 package. lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/xenial/juju2/xenial-2.0-beta2 The juju team propose a new juju2 packages

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
Ok I've gotten it down to some minor packaging issues: I: juju2: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/juju-2.0-beta2/bin/juju ang and N: N:Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list N:of common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary N:

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
Ok I've gotten it down to some minor packaging issues: I: juju2: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/juju-2.0-beta2/bin/juju ang and N: N:Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list N:of common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary N:

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
With my latest changes here is the lintian report: I: juju2 source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/github.com/chai2010/gettext-go (paragraph at line 58) N: N:The wildcard that was specified matches no file in the source tree. This N:either indicates that you should fix

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
With my latest changes here is the lintian report: I: juju2 source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/github.com/chai2010/gettext-go (paragraph at line 58) N: N:The wildcard that was specified matches no file in the source tree. This N:either indicates that you should fix

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
For completeness this is the lintian output in all its glory: E: juju2 changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file xenial-amd64 N: N:You've specified an unknown target distribution for your upload in the N:debian/changelog file. It is possible that you are uploading for a N:different

[Bug 1560315] Re: [needs packaging] juju2 beta is not in xenial

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Stokes
For completeness this is the lintian output in all its glory: E: juju2 changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file xenial-amd64 N: N:You've specified an unknown target distribution for your upload in the N:debian/changelog file. It is possible that you are uploading for a N:different

[Bug 1551854] Re: LXD bootstrap issues on xenial

2016-03-02 Thread Adam Stokes
Here is my config: name: juju-078fe32d-4080-4f11-83e2-e579ead11df8-machine-0 profiles: - default - juju-myish config: user.juju-model-uuid: "true" user.user-data: | #cloud-config output: all: '| tee -a /var/log/cloud-init-output.log' runcmd: - set -xe - install -D -m

[Bug 1551854] Re: LXD bootstrap issues on xenial

2016-03-02 Thread Adam Stokes
Also wrt to Juju, if I do the following: umount /sys/kernel/debug mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug And then reissue a juju bootstrap it will complete successfully :\ where as before I was running into this error: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15267564/ -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1546484] Re: openstack-install fails

2016-02-22 Thread Adam Stokes
Are you able to `juju bootstrap` outside of the installer? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546484 Title: openstack-install fails To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1547640] Re: proxy tries ipv6 and gets 503 when no ipv6 routes

2016-02-19 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: cloud-installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547640 Title: proxy tries ipv6 and gets 503 when no ipv6 routes To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1547640] Re: proxy tries ipv6 and gets 503 when no ipv6 routes

2016-02-19 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: cloud-installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547640 Title: proxy tries ipv6 and gets 503 when no ipv6 routes To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1546484] Re: openstack-install fails

2016-02-17 Thread Adam Stokes
I don't think you have MAAS configured properly, according to this error: [INFO: 02-16 23:04:23, openstack-install:227] Starting OpenStack Installer v0.99.27 [INFO: 02-16 23:04:23, openstack-install:228] Start command: ['/usr/bin/openstack-install', '--openstack-release', 'liberty'] [INFO:

[Bug 1509747] Re: Intermittent lxc failures on wily

2015-10-27 Thread Adam Stokes
I'm also running into this issue when attempting to deploy a service with juju + wily template, the template lxc container fails to stop so cloning doesn't perform. ** Tags added: cloud-installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1509414] Re: pre-installed lxc in cloud image produces broken lxc (and later lxd) containers

2015-10-24 Thread Adam Stokes
I've also tested manually and via our OpenStack installer and lxcbr0 is assigned (10.0.4.1) and the network is able to reach out to the internet as before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1509414] Re: pre-installed lxc in cloud image produces broken lxc (and later lxd) containers

2015-10-24 Thread Adam Stokes
I've also tested manually and via our OpenStack installer and lxcbr0 is assigned (10.0.4.1) and the network is able to reach out to the internet as before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: cloud-installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509414 Title: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose To manage notifications about

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: cloud-installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509414 Title: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509414 Title: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose To manage

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509414 Title: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: - The released wily image preinstalls lxc, which breaks the assumption - that lxc's preinst packaging script makes: + [Problem] + The released wily image preinstalls lxc, which breaks the assumption that lxc's preinst packaging script makes: It inspects the network

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: - The released wily image preinstalls lxc, which breaks the assumption - that lxc's preinst packaging script makes: + [Problem] + The released wily image preinstalls lxc, which breaks the assumption that lxc's preinst packaging script makes: It inspects the network

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: [Problem] The released wily image preinstalls lxc, which breaks the assumption that lxc's preinst packaging script makes: It inspects the network to try to pick a 10.0.N.0 network that isn't being used, with N starting at 3, so this appears to have picked

[Bug 1509414] Re: lxc postinst script checks available interfaces, can choose

2015-10-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Description changed: [Problem] The released wily image preinstalls lxc, which breaks the assumption that lxc's preinst packaging script makes: It inspects the network to try to pick a 10.0.N.0 network that isn't being used, with N starting at 3, so this appears to have picked

[Bug 1508744] Re: Upgrade to Ubuntu 15.10 Broken: lxc-net.service fails on upgrade

2015-10-22 Thread Adam Stokes
I hit this too, I actually just had to run: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net stop And it seemed to put itself back into a state that systemd could work with -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1508744] Re: Upgrade to Ubuntu 15.10 Broken: lxc-net.service fails on upgrade

2015-10-22 Thread Adam Stokes
I hit this too, I actually just had to run: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net stop And it seemed to put itself back into a state that systemd could work with -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1486296] Re: Unable to start VMs under a lxc container

2015-09-02 Thread Adam Stokes
I was able to start up VM's within the container without any issues now. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1486296] Re: Unable to start VMs under a lxc container

2015-08-19 Thread Adam Stokes
Here is the bit of code we use to create a container with, it shells out to lxc-create passing in a custom userdata file: ``` @classmethod def create(cls, name, userdata): creates a container from ubuntu-cloud template # NOTE: the -F template arg is a workaround.

[Bug 1486296] Re: Unable to start VMs under a lxc container

2015-08-19 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Vivid) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486296

[Bug 1486296] [NEW] Unable to start VMs under a lxc container

2015-08-18 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: Our installer attempts to load VM's within an lxc container. This worked on trusty, however, with the latest releases from vivid and wily those VM's are unable to start. This affects running juju-local within a container as well. We think it has something to do with

[Bug 1486296] [NEW] Unable to start VMs under a lxc container

2015-08-18 Thread Adam Stokes
Public bug reported: Our installer attempts to load VM's within an lxc container. This worked on trusty, however, with the latest releases from vivid and wily those VM's are unable to start. This affects running juju-local within a container as well. We think it has something to do with

[Bug 1481337] Re: please update keepalived to version 1.2.17 or higher

2015-08-10 Thread Adam Stokes
** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Vivid) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1481337] Re: please update keepalived to version 1.2.17 or higher

2015-08-10 Thread Adam Stokes
** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Vivid) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1408833] Re: broken postinst test for uvtool-libvirt

2015-06-02 Thread Adam Stokes
Enki, Looks like you just need the enablement kernel: See here for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseNotes#LTS_Hardware_Enablement_Stack You'll want to make sure you're on a 3.16-0-38.52 or higher -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1408833] Re: broken postinst test for uvtool-libvirt on utopic

2015-05-12 Thread Adam Stokes
The problem exists in kernel 3.16.0-30-generic on trusty as well. Can we get this fix backported to trusty? ** Also affects: cloud-installer Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-installer Status: New = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - broken postinst test for

[Bug 1433761] Re: apt-key and add-apt-repository don't honor Acquire::http::Proxy

2015-03-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** Tags added: cloud-installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1433761 Title: apt-key and add-apt-repository don't honor Acquire::http::Proxy To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1356211] Re: cannot collect rotated syslog.1

2015-03-04 Thread Adam Stokes
Merged upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356211 Title: cannot collect rotated syslog.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1421375] Re: AttributeError when attempting to access _sys.maxint

2015-02-13 Thread Adam Stokes
Tested with python3-netaddr 0.7.10-1ubuntu1.1 code: In[2]:from netaddr import IPSet In [3]: ,.join(str(x) for x in list(IPSet(['10.0.4.0/24']))) Out[3]:

[Bug 1421375] Re: AttributeError when attempting to access _sys.maxint

2015-02-13 Thread Adam Stokes
Tested with python3-netaddr 0.7.10-1ubuntu1.1 code: In[2]:from netaddr import IPSet In [3]: ,.join(str(x) for x in list(IPSet(['10.0.4.0/24']))) Out[3]:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >