[Bug 226405] Re: Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

2011-08-01 Thread Arnaud Quette
A MIR for a nut-client package (and some others) is underway: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/816414 better late than never... cheers, Arnaud ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-07-26 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette: Whiteboard changed: Work items: [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE

Re: [Bug 816414] [NEW] [MIR] nut (nut-doc, nut-client, nut-server)

2011-07-26 Thread Arnaud Quette
moreover, it's part of the ServerOneiricInfraPower blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-infra-power cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian

Re: [Bug 816414] [NEW] [MIR] nut (nut-doc, nut-client, nut-server)

2011-07-26 Thread Arnaud Quette
moreover, it's part of the ServerOneiricInfraPower blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-infra-power cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian

Re: [Bug 815760] Re: 2.6.1-2ubuntu1 FTBFS on i386

2011-07-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi James, thanks for your report. 2011/7/25 James Page 815...@bugs.launchpad.net Reproduced locally in sbuild environment; a bit more information on the failure: xsltproc --stringparam callout.graphics 0 --stringparam navig.graphics 0 --stringparam admon.textlabel 1 --stringparam

Re: [Bug 815760] Re: 2.6.1-2ubuntu1 FTBFS on i386

2011-07-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi James, thanks for your report. 2011/7/25 James Page 815...@bugs.launchpad.net Reproduced locally in sbuild environment; a bit more information on the failure: xsltproc --stringparam callout.graphics 0 --stringparam navig.graphics 0 --stringparam admon.textlabel 1 --stringparam

[Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2011-07-19 Thread Arnaud Quette
guys, this seems related to a udev issue. things to try: - stop nut (sudo service nut stop ; killall -9 megatec_usb) - start the driver and server as root (sudo /lib/nut/megatec_usb -u root -a belkin-ups sudo upsd -u root) - then check using upsc you should also try the blazer_usb driver, as

[Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2011-07-19 Thread Arnaud Quette
guys, this seems related to a udev issue. things to try: - stop nut (sudo service nut stop ; killall -9 megatec_usb) - start the driver and server as root (sudo /lib/nut/megatec_usb -u root -a belkin-ups sudo upsd -u root) - then check using upsc you should also try the blazer_usb driver, as

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2011-07-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/7/18 Dave Walker davewal...@ubuntu.com @Arnaud, I'm confused as to the current status of this bug. Is there anything that needs to be done? @Dave: I'm not completely sure. the user has found a workaround. IMHO, we are probably facing some race condition between upstart native script Vs

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2011-07-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/7/18 Dave Walker davewal...@ubuntu.com @Arnaud, I'm confused as to the current status of this bug. Is there anything that needs to be done? @Dave: I'm not completely sure. the user has found a workaround. IMHO, we are probably facing some race condition between upstart native script Vs

[Bug 811976] [NEW] Update nut to 2.6.1-2

2011-07-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
Public bug reported: Debian (Laurent Bigonville) has released a package update: Changes: nut (2.6.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/nut.README.Debian: Adjust udev rules naming for permissions override (Closes: #529664) * Re-add and refresh

[Bug 811976] [NEW] Update nut to 2.6.1-2

2011-07-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
Public bug reported: Debian (Laurent Bigonville) has released a package update: Changes: nut (2.6.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/nut.README.Debian: Adjust udev rules naming for permissions override (Closes: #529664) * Re-add and refresh

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-07-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette: Whiteboard changed: Work items: [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-07-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Martin, 2011/6/27 Martin Ewing martin.s.ew...@gmail.com I have a very similar situation with my Belkin UPS on Natty (worked on previous release). See $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 11.04 Release:11.04 martin@gimli:~$ aptitude show nut Package: nut State:

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-07-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/7/13 Martin Ewing martin.s.ew...@gmail.com Arnaud, Thanks for the reply! I imagine you are correct. I ran the command you suggested (below). Apparently nut knows the device it should connect to, but that device is busy. And running as root doesn't overcome the problem... (And I

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-07-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Martin, 2011/6/27 Martin Ewing martin.s.ew...@gmail.com I have a very similar situation with my Belkin UPS on Natty (worked on previous release). See $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 11.04 Release:11.04 martin@gimli:~$ aptitude show nut Package: nut State:

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-07-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/7/13 Martin Ewing martin.s.ew...@gmail.com Arnaud, Thanks for the reply! I imagine you are correct. I ran the command you suggested (below). Apparently nut knows the device it should connect to, but that device is busy. And running as root doesn't overcome the problem... (And I

[Bug 809166] [NEW] Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

2011-07-12 Thread Arnaud Quette
Public bug reported: fence-agents 3.1.5 has been released on 08-Jul-2011: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/e/fence-agents/ Please consider an update Andres ;-) cheers, Arnaud ** Affects: fence-agents (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-06-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette: Whiteboard changed: Work items: [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-05-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette: Whiteboard changed: Work items: [aquette] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE [aquette

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-05-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette: Whiteboard changed: Work items: [aquette] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE [aquette

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-05-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette: Whiteboard changed: Work items: - [aquette] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS + [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: INPROGRESS [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/14 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Yes, I can confirm that this fixed the issue I reported. thanks for the confirmation Arnaud, thank you so much! my pleasure Matt :) Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/14 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Yes, I can confirm that this fixed the issue I reported. thanks for the confirmation Arnaud, thank you so much! my pleasure Matt :) Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hey Matt, 2011/5/13 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net I thought I'd be able to just copy/paste the instructions one at a time but I hit a few snags. I installed the missing prereqs and continued on. (...) hem, sorry. I should have given you more info on build-deps and more generally

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hey Matt, 2011/5/13 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net I thought I'd be able to just copy/paste the instructions one at a time but I hit a few snags. I installed the missing prereqs and continued on. (...) hem, sorry. I should have given you more info on build-deps and more generally

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-12 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/11 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Certainly! excellent, here we go: $ svn co svn://svn.debian.org/nut/trunk $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --prefix=/usr \ --exec-prefix=/ \ --sysconfdir=/etc/nut \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-12 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/11 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Certainly! excellent, here we go: $ svn co svn://svn.debian.org/nut/trunk $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --prefix=/usr \ --exec-prefix=/ \ --sysconfdir=/etc/nut \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/11 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Arnaud, I hope that I captured enough of the information for you. thanks Matt. I'm still trying to find a solution that would satisfy everybody. not that easy! would you be able to test an svn version (just a checkout and minimum compilation to

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/11 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Arnaud, I hope that I captured enough of the information for you. thanks Matt. I'm still trying to find a solution that would satisfy everybody. not that easy! would you be able to test an svn version (just a checkout and minimum compilation to

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Matt, 2011/5/10 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Arnaud, Here is what you have asked for. Matt •[x4linux:~] mmusgrove $ sudo service nut stop [sudo] password for mmusgrove: * Stopping Network UPS Tools [ OK ] •[x4linux:~]

Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Matt, 2011/5/10 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Arnaud, Here is what you have asked for. Matt •[x4linux:~] mmusgrove $ sudo service nut stop [sudo] password for mmusgrove: * Stopping Network UPS Tools [ OK ] •[x4linux:~]

Re: [Bug 779512] [NEW] nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-09 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/8 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Prior to upgrading to Natty, I had the nut-2.4.3-1ubuntu5 package and it was working correctly. right, but the fix made for the kind of devices you have (ie not fully complying to USB standards)

Re: [Bug 779512] [NEW] nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-05-09 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/5/8 Mr. Muskrat 779...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Prior to upgrading to Natty, I had the nut-2.4.3-1ubuntu5 package and it was working correctly. right, but the fix made for the kind of devices you have (ie not fully complying to USB standards)

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-04-26 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/21 Michal Soltys sol...@ziu.info On 11-04-21 10:34, Arnaud Quette wrote: Hi Lupe, since we now have an apcsmart maintainer, I'm forwarding this issue to him. @Michal: could you please have a look at this issue [1], and give us your feeling? cheers, Arnaud -- [1] https

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-04-26 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/21 Michal Soltys sol...@ziu.info On 11-04-21 10:34, Arnaud Quette wrote: Hi Lupe, since we now have an apcsmart maintainer, I'm forwarding this issue to him. @Michal: could you please have a look at this issue [1], and give us your feeling? cheers, Arnaud -- [1] https

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-04-21 Thread Arnaud Quette
, 2011-02-15 at 13:16:58 -, Arnaud Quette wrote: this is not the problem. This code is in the smartmode() function of apcsmart.c: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/nut/trunk/drivers/apcsmart.c we see the 5 attempts to go to smart mode ('Y' command), but my aim is to understand why it is failing

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-04-21 Thread Arnaud Quette
, 2011-02-15 at 13:16:58 -, Arnaud Quette wrote: this is not the problem. This code is in the smartmode() function of apcsmart.c: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/nut/trunk/drivers/apcsmart.c we see the 5 attempts to go to smart mode ('Y' command), but my aim is to understand why it is failing

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
so what if you issue again an upsc powercom? does it still broke the pipe? is your issue 100 % reproducible? my guess, is ATM, that the faulty end-of-line marker in battery.type is causing parseconf to close prematurely the connexion, while upsd is still sending data. which explains why unit

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/18 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net yes, it 100 % reproducible. I also managed to reproduce it using dummy-ups (the simulation driver) and injecting the error on the same variable: adding a newline (ie \n) results in a broken pipe on upsc side. i am ready to test svn version. ok,

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/18 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net It`s working great! Many thanks! excellent, thanks for the feedback. I've just committed it upstream (r2972) the changeset will be available on the NUT Trac mirror (just give it some minutes to sync):

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
so what if you issue again an upsc powercom? does it still broke the pipe? is your issue 100 % reproducible? my guess, is ATM, that the faulty end-of-line marker in battery.type is causing parseconf to close prematurely the connexion, while upsd is still sending data. which explains why unit

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/18 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net yes, it 100 % reproducible. I also managed to reproduce it using dummy-ups (the simulation driver) and injecting the error on the same variable: adding a newline (ie \n) results in a broken pipe on upsc side. i am ready to test svn version. ok,

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/18 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net It`s working great! Many thanks! excellent, thanks for the feedback. I've just committed it upstream (r2972) the changeset will be available on the NUT Trac mirror (just give it some minutes to sync):

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/16 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net $ upsc battery.type Error: Unknown UPS $ upsc ups.status Error: Unknown UPS damn, I missed a bit (ie the device name): $ upsc powercom battery.type Error: Unknown UPS $ upsc powercom ups.status Error: Unknown UPS don't forget to run upsd in debug

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/16 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net $ upsc battery.type Error: Unknown UPS $ upsc ups.status Error: Unknown UPS damn, I missed a bit (ie the device name): $ upsc powercom battery.type Error: Unknown UPS $ upsc powercom ups.status Error: Unknown UPS don't forget to run upsd in debug

Re: [Bug 753661] [NEW] upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/7 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut I have Powercom UPS and trying configure it with NUT. lsusb: Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0d9f:0004 Powercom Co., Ltd ups.conf: [powercom] driver = usbhid-ups port = /dev/usb/hiddev0

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/16 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net Seems driver respond correctly, but upsd return Broken pipe after: 25.768861 write: [destfd=6] [len=35] [VAR powercom battery.type PbAc ] Two lines? yup, but upsd sends everything. and upsc brokes the pipe. the driver is still there, so the

Re: [Bug 753661] [NEW] upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/7 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut I have Powercom UPS and trying configure it with NUT. lsusb: Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0d9f:0004 Powercom Co., Ltd ups.conf: [powercom] driver = usbhid-ups port = /dev/usb/hiddev0

Re: [Bug 753661] Re: upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

2011-04-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/4/16 Virus 753...@bugs.launchpad.net Seems driver respond correctly, but upsd return Broken pipe after: 25.768861 write: [destfd=6] [len=35] [VAR powercom battery.type PbAc ] Two lines? yup, but upsd sends everything. and upsc brokes the pipe. the driver is still there, so the

Re: [Bug 743484] [NEW] libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols

2011-03-29 Thread Arnaud Quette
Salut Fabrice 2011/3/27 Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Hi, While I was investigating a FTBFS in collectd: ... configure:22249: checking for upscli_connect in -lupsclient configure:22274: i686-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -Wall -g -O2

Re: [Bug 743484] [NEW] libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols

2011-03-29 Thread Arnaud Quette
Salut Fabrice 2011/3/27 Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Hi, While I was investigating a FTBFS in collectd: ... configure:22249: checking for upscli_connect in -lupsclient configure:22274: i686-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -Wall -g -O2

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-15 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/2/15 Lupe Christoph On Monday, 2011-02-14 at 21:54:20 -, Arnaud Quette wrote: I definitely need more info! please reply to ALL: - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing? SmartUPS 300I NET. I have the serial number (GS9809283199) but no date. it seems

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-15 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/2/15 Lupe Christoph On Monday, 2011-02-14 at 21:54:20 -, Arnaud Quette wrote: I definitely need more info! please reply to ALL: - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing? SmartUPS 300I NET. I have the serial number (GS9809283199) but no date. it seems

Re: [Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
I definitely need more info! please reply to ALL: - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing? - are you sure this unit is ok? - have you really checked the cabling or made the whole (cable + UPS) work somehow (using APC's software or apcupsd)? - what is the meantime between occurrences

Re: [Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
I definitely need more info! please reply to ALL: - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing? - are you sure this unit is ok? - have you really checked the cabling or made the whole (cable + UPS) work somehow (using APC's software or apcupsd)? - what is the meantime between occurrences

Re: [Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Christoph, 2011/2/10 Lupe Christoph Since the supposed fix, I have had several ne incidents of this bug. I'm now running Maverick Meerkat, and the log shows this: Feb 10 14:10:14 alanya apcsmart[3238]: Communications with UPS lost: Communications with UPS lost - check cabling Feb 10

Re: [Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Christoph, 2011/2/10 Lupe Christoph Since the supposed fix, I have had several ne incidents of this bug. I'm now running Maverick Meerkat, and the log shows this: Feb 10 14:10:14 alanya apcsmart[3238]: Communications with UPS lost: Communications with UPS lost - check cabling Feb 10

Re: [Bug 705552] Re: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules

2011-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/1/24 Hugh Saunders Apologies, I had forgotten about /lib/udev/rules.d. I have removed 52-nut-usbups.rules from /etc/udev/rules.d and it still works (see log below). There must have been some other configuration problem initially. I have marked this bug as invalid. (...) quite probably

Re: [Bug 705552] Re: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules

2011-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/1/24 Hugh Saunders Apologies, I had forgotten about /lib/udev/rules.d. I have removed 52-nut-usbups.rules from /etc/udev/rules.d and it still works (see log below). There must have been some other configuration problem initially. I have marked this bug as invalid. (...) quite probably

Re: [Bug 687985] Re: [FTBFS] package 'nut' (2.4.3-1ubuntu5) failed to build on natty

2011-01-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/1/10 Laurent Bigonville bi...@bigon.be I've found the issue. Actually the nut_check_*.m4 are setting *_LDFLAGS instead of *_LIBS, and due to a toolchain change this become visible (gcc -o testusb testusb.c -lusb is working but gcc -o testusb -lusb testusb.c is not working anymore)

Re: [Bug 687985] Re: [FTBFS] package 'nut' (2.4.3-1ubuntu5) failed to build on natty

2011-01-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/1/10 Laurent Bigonville bi...@bigon.be I've found the issue. Actually the nut_check_*.m4 are setting *_LDFLAGS instead of *_LIBS, and due to a toolchain change this become visible (gcc -o testusb testusb.c -lusb is working but gcc -o testusb -lusb testusb.c is not working anymore)

Re: [Bug 692171] [NEW] using BUS= in udev rules causes system boot error/warning

2010-12-19 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/12/19 Alf Aedan 692...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Whenever I boot my system (running Ubuntu 10.10), I get these errors in my boot.log and on the screen if I'm on the console: udevd[458]: BUS= will be removed in a future udev version, please use

Re: [Bug 692171] [NEW] using BUS= in udev rules causes system boot error/warning

2010-12-19 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/12/19 Alf Aedan 692...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Whenever I boot my system (running Ubuntu 10.10), I get these errors in my boot.log and on the screen if I'm on the console: udevd[458]: BUS= will be removed in a future udev version, please use

Re: [Bug 687985] Re: [FTBFS] package 'nut' (2.4.3-1ubuntu5) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Dave, thanks for your report and logs. this is strange, since there is only a minor libusb update, which seems not to break compatibility. but the fact is that AC_CHECK_FUNCS doesn't find usb_init() anymore, so there is actually something wrong. I'm currently busy preparing 2.6.0, so don't

Re: [Bug 687985] Re: [FTBFS] package 'nut' (2.4.3-1ubuntu5) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Dave, thanks for your report and logs. this is strange, since there is only a minor libusb update, which seems not to break compatibility. but the fact is that AC_CHECK_FUNCS doesn't find usb_init() anymore, so there is actually something wrong. I'm currently busy preparing 2.6.0, so don't

Re: [Bug 662435] Re: megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04

2010-10-20 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Michael, thanks for your feedback! I'm cc'ing the NUT users list for info. I've also added an entry for your device (Powerwalker Line Interactive VI 1400, using blazer_usb). Can you please send back an upsc output, and at least check for the shutdown behavior, if not already done:

Fwd: [Bug 662435] Re: megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04

2010-10-20 Thread Arnaud Quette
FYI @Arjen: anything else required? cheers, Arnaud -- Forwarded message -- From: MichaelE 662...@bugs.launchpad.net Date: 2010/10/20 Subject: [Bug 662435] Re: megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04 To: aquette@gmail.com I tested the shutdown

Re: [Bug 662435] Re: megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04

2010-10-20 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Michael, thanks for your feedback! I'm cc'ing the NUT users list for info. I've also added an entry for your device (Powerwalker Line Interactive VI 1400, using blazer_usb). Can you please send back an upsc output, and at least check for the shutdown behavior, if not already done:

Fwd: [Bug 662435] Re: megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04

2010-10-20 Thread Arnaud Quette
FYI @Arjen: anything else required? cheers, Arnaud -- Forwarded message -- From: MichaelE 662...@bugs.launchpad.net Date: 2010/10/20 Subject: [Bug 662435] Re: megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04 To: aquette@gmail.com I tested the shutdown

Re: [Bug 662435] [NEW] megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04

2010-10-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/10/18 MichaelE 662...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut I was using nut with the megatec_usb driver for years without problems. Now I upgraded my server to 10.04 and the driver stopped to work with nut_2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1. Here is the ups.conf I am using

Re: [Bug 662435] [NEW] megatec_usb driver stopped working after upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04

2010-10-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/10/18 MichaelE 662...@bugs.launchpad.net Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut I was using nut with the megatec_usb driver for years without problems. Now I upgraded my server to 10.04 and the driver stopped to work with nut_2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1. Here is the ups.conf I am using

[Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-28 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Attachment added: replacement /etc/init.d/nut for debug / investigation purpose http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52657944/nut -- problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-28 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/28 Wolfgang Lubowski there are no results for mge-utalk in /var/log/messages any (driver(s) failed) message during the boot? if I don't start nut manually with /etc/init.d/nut start, I always get the following message: Broadcast Message from n...@l4 (somewhere) at 10:40 ...

[Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-28 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Attachment added: replacement /etc/init.d/nut for debug / investigation purpose http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52657944/nut -- problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-28 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/28 Wolfgang Lubowski there are no results for mge-utalk in /var/log/messages any (driver(s) failed) message during the boot? if I don't start nut manually with /etc/init.d/nut start, I always get the following message: Broadcast Message from n...@l4 (somewhere) at 10:40 ...

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/26 Wolfgang Lubowski w@gmx.at I still get the same outputs with NUT-Monitor. my nut.conf looks now the following: MODE=standalone ps -efl | grep mge-utalk: 0 S root 2066 2002 0 80 0 - 1907 pipe_w 08:37 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto mge-utalk upsc mgeups:

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/26 Wolfgang Lubowski w@gmx.at I still get the same outputs with NUT-Monitor. my nut.conf looks now the following: MODE=standalone ps -efl | grep mge-utalk: 0 S root 2066 2002 0 80 0 - 1907 pipe_w 08:37 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto mge-utalk upsc mgeups:

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-23 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/23 Wolfgang Lubowski w@gmx.at this is the output for upsc mgeups: device.mfr: MGE UPS SYSTEMS device.model: Pulsar ES8+ device.type: ups driver.name: mge-utalk driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: /dev/ttyS0 driver.version: 2.4.3 driver.version.internal:

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-23 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/23 Wolfgang Lubowski w@gmx.at this is the output for upsc mgeups: device.mfr: MGE UPS SYSTEMS device.model: Pulsar ES8+ device.type: ups driver.name: mge-utalk driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: /dev/ttyS0 driver.version: 2.4.3 driver.version.internal:

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-22 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Wolfgang, I'm cc'ing NUT-Monitor author, for info 2010/7/22 Wolfgang Lubowski sorry for bothering you again autoshutdown works fine, thank you :) but a graphical tool would be nice too, and nut-monitor doesn't work up to now: if I start it from terminal, I get the following: Traceback

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-22 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/22 Wolfgang Lubowski 608...@bugs.launchpad.net and there is another thing I don't really understand: these ups-things aren't started completely, after reboot I get UPS mge...@localhost is unavailable, so I have to run /etc/init.d/nut start and then it works. there can be several

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-22 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Wolfgang, I'm cc'ing NUT-Monitor author, for info 2010/7/22 Wolfgang Lubowski sorry for bothering you again autoshutdown works fine, thank you :) but a graphical tool would be nice too, and nut-monitor doesn't work up to now: if I start it from terminal, I get the following: Traceback

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-22 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/22 Wolfgang Lubowski 608...@bugs.launchpad.net and there is another thing I don't really understand: these ups-things aren't started completely, after reboot I get UPS mge...@localhost is unavailable, so I have to run /etc/init.d/nut start and then it works. there can be several

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-21 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Wolfgang, a first and quick comment: this is not a NUT bug, but rather a PSP one! 2010/7/21 Wolfgang Lubowski oops, doesn't work like I expected :) nut.conf: MODE=none apart from some binary issues with PSP, this one is still sitting on NUT 2.2 compatibility. On Debian, I've recently

Re: [Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2010-07-21 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Wolfgang, a first and quick comment: this is not a NUT bug, but rather a PSP one! 2010/7/21 Wolfgang Lubowski oops, doesn't work like I expected :) nut.conf: MODE=none apart from some binary issues with PSP, this one is still sitting on NUT 2.2 compatibility. On Debian, I've recently

Re: [Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2010-07-09 Thread Arnaud Quette
guys, I'd be interested in a driver debug output, ie: $ export USB_DEBUG=3 $ /lib/nut/megatec_usb -D -a upsname let it run for a couple of minutes, then break it (using Ctrl+C) and send back the trace. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network

Re: [Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2010-07-09 Thread Arnaud Quette
guys, I'd be interested in a driver debug output, ie: $ export USB_DEBUG=3 $ /lib/nut/megatec_usb -D -a upsname let it run for a couple of minutes, then break it (using Ctrl+C) and send back the trace. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network

Re: [Bug 598028] Re: Only pwrkap-gui should depend on python-matplotlib

2010-07-06 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/7/5 Thierry Carrez @Arnaud: python-matplotlib is still a depends from pwrkap in 7.30-4: ooch, I did it. -5 uploaded, and actually fixing it (double² checked) Arno -- Only pwrkap-gui should depend on python-matplotlib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598028 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 598028] Re: Only pwrkap-gui should depend on python-matplotlib

2010-06-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/6/25 Thierry Carrez Thanks Arnaud, will do ! you're welcome. -4 is now in unstable, so ready for the sync: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pwrkap/news/20100624T190215Z.html cheers, Arno -- Only pwrkap-gui should depend on python-matplotlib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598028 You

Re: [Bug 598028] [NEW] Only pwrkap-gui should depend on python-matplotlib

2010-06-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Thierry, 2010/6/24 Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pwrkap pwrkap depends on python-matplotlib, which depends on graphical libraries. This pulls unnecessary slack on servers where pwrkap would be installed. It looks like only

Re: [Bug 572262] Re: [SRU] libusb_get_report: error sending control message: Operation not permitted

2010-05-04 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/5/3 Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com Statement of Impact: nut in lucid was shipped with a bug that prevented some UPSes from connecting to the nut daemon. Checking google fedora was also affected by the same problem and has the same patch that we used. Explanation: This bug has

Re: [Bug 572262] Re: [SRU] libusb_get_report: error sending control message: Operation not permitted

2010-05-04 Thread Arnaud Quette
2010/5/3 Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com Statement of Impact: nut in lucid was shipped with a bug that prevented some UPSes from connecting to the nut daemon. Checking google fedora was also affected by the same problem and has the same patch that we used. Explanation: This bug has

Re: [Bug 572262] [NEW] libusb_get_report: error sending control message: Operation not permitted

2010-04-30 Thread Arnaud Quette
please try to unplug and plug back your UPS's USB cord, and then relaunch nut. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer

Re: [Bug 572262] [NEW] libusb_get_report: error sending control message: Operation not permitted

2010-04-30 Thread Arnaud Quette
please try to unplug and plug back your UPS's USB cord, and then relaunch nut. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer

Re: [Bug 535152] Re: FFE for nut 2.4.3

2010-03-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
guys, 2010/3/9 Chuck Short: Unfortunately it hasnt been tested by me. I rather get Arnaud's thoughts on this. I've not been able to do much testing on DK-p and none UPower. what I can say for the DK-p side (which theoretically should be applicable to UPower) is: - if a USB UPS is plugged,

Re: [Bug 535152] Re: FFE for nut 2.4.3

2010-03-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
guys, 2010/3/9 Chuck Short: Unfortunately it hasnt been tested by me. I rather get Arnaud's thoughts on this. I've not been able to do much testing on DK-p and none UPower. what I can say for the DK-p side (which theoretically should be applicable to UPower) is: - if a USB UPS is plugged,

Re: [Bug 447586] Re: megatec_usb does not work anymore with a Trust PW-4130M UPS

2009-10-28 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hey Björn, 2009/10/26 Björn Torkelsson: I extracted the megatec_usb and blazer_usb from the 2.4.1-3ubuntu2 and tried them using the method in comment 5. No sucess though. ** Attachment added: Test with the Blazer driver from karmic (2.4.1-3ubuntu2)  

Re: [Bug 447586] Re: megatec_usb does not work anymore with a Trust PW-4130M UPS

2009-10-28 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hey Björn, 2009/10/26 Björn Torkelsson: I extracted the megatec_usb and blazer_usb from the 2.4.1-3ubuntu2 and tried them using the method in comment 5. No sucess though. ** Attachment added: Test with the Blazer driver from karmic (2.4.1-3ubuntu2)  

Re: [Bug 447586] [NEW] megatec_usb does not work anymore with a Trust PW-4130M UPS

2009-10-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Björn, 2009/10/9 Björn Torkelsson Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut I have recently upgraded from hardy to intrepid to jaunty. After upgrading to Intrepid the megatec_usb stopped recognizing my Trust PW- 4130M ups, it still does not work on Jaunty. It worked without any

<    1   2   3   4   5   >