** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
ubuntu-xsplash-artwork contains redundant graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438244
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 436817 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436817
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 436817
Enable new gdm theme for Karmic
--
inconsistency between gdm background, xsplash and user backgrounds
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436684
You
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
xsplash timing out too early
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435522
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
Throbber appears to be incorrectly positioned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: ubuntu-sounds (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
Cannot prevent login sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Scott, are you still having your issue? I can't reproduce it here, but
if you think your system isn't receiving the signals and that xsplash is
falling back to the timeout can you try setting the timeout to a high
enough value to be sure? You can run xsplash --timeout=60 or whatever
seems
David, Rick, MT, and wheover else:
gdm seems to use the default background image, and so far I haven't
found a place to configure it to do otherwise. To configure it
otherwise seems that we need gdm to have a home directory in which to
store its GConf settings, and gdm user currently doesn't
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/xsplash/throbber-location
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = In Progress
--
Ubuntu boot screen shifts to top left of screen after login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433289
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Throbber appears to be incorrectly positioned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
Title says it all.
** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Cody Russell (bratsche)
Status: New
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
Enable new gdm theme for Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436817
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
The UserAdded and UserRemoved signals don't work. They're passing
pointers to GdmUser objects, but the dbus API is exposing that they
should pass gint64 for the uid instead.
** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
This is a blocker for indicator-session right now.
--
UserManager.UserAdded/UserRemoved signals broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436195
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Yeah, I've reproduced it here as well. I'll try to get this fixed later
in the week and put out a new release.
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Sounds like maybe power settings for gdm user? xsplash is definitely
never doing anything related to this.
--
xsplash dims and undims despite power settings disabling dimming the screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434353
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I think what we'll probably do is to put xsplash on the primary display
only, and have the second one be black.
--
New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Pre-desktop throbber should give indication of progress
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Yeah, seems like maybe we're competing for scheduler time with the
desktop as it's loading. Not sure what to do about it yet, but
hopefully we'll get it looking smoother.
--
karmic X windows boot progress graphics looks buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425720
You received this bug
I think I was wrong. Looks like we will get this into the release later
today, thanks to our resident superhero Ken van Dine!
--
bottom gnome-panel bar sometime on top of xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 420225 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 420225
New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup
--
xsplash looks bad on dual-display (ati rv535, ati driver)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432150
You
** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/xsplash/add-signal
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Also
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
In the next release of xsplash we support running with --daemon option
to detach the process. gdm's Init/Default and PreSession/Default files
currently call /usr/bin/xsplash but should change to using
/usr/bin/xsplash --daemon
** Affects: gdm
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/xsplash/+bug/429602 for reference
--
gdm init scripts should launch xsplash --daemon instead of xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430834
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Branch linked: lp:~dbarth/xsplash/artwork-licensing
--
Split package and fix licensing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: panel-curtain.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31907582/panel-curtain.diff
--
Configurable signals broke the panel/nautilus signals
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430060
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
Split package and fix licensing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Split package and fix licensing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Configurable signals broke the panel/nautilus signals
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430060
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
Configurable signals broke the panel/nautilus signals
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430060
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: nautilus-curtain.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31909678/nautilus-curtain.diff
--
Configurable signals broke the panel/nautilus signals
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430060
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/nautilus/nautilus-xsplash-changes
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/gnome-panel/gnome-panel-xsplash-changes
** Description changed:
- Title says it all.
+ We changed xsplash so that the signals it listens for can be configured.
+ This was necessarily to get it to
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
bottom gnome-panel bar sometime on top of xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
bottom gnome-panel bar sometime on top of xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
karmic X windows boot progress graphics looks buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425720
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Thank you Nicolò. I've got a branch ready that appears to fix the
problem, but I'm afraid it wasn't done in time for tomorrow's release.
It should be available in next week's release though.
--
bottom gnome-panel bar sometime on top of xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427511
You received
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
should not wait for softwares not in the session to be loaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427909
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
bottom gnome-panel bar sometime on top of xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/xsplash/panel-above
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/xsplash/panel-above-0.7
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
karmic X windows boot progress graphics looks buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425720
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Logo and throbber images off-center
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Ping pong mode doesn't show last frame
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
There is a new set of graphics we're about to release to xsplash, and
this should fix the weird look of things. Right now everything is just
a placeholder.
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
karmic X windows boot progress graphics looks
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Ping pong mode doesn't show last frame
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I assume this is talking about the display brightness dimming and then
brightening. That's the only thing I've seen that sounds like this that
I can confirm.
** Also affects: gnome-power
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Invalid
** Also
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Xsplash freeze the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
Logo and throbber images off-center
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420495
You received
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = High
--
Xsplash freeze the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
Ping pong mode doesn't show last frame
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420249
You received
** Branch linked: lp:~bratsche/xsplash/logo-placement
--
Logo and throbber images off-center
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Logo and throbber images off-center
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
That sounds like an Xorg problem, not an xsplash problem.
--
Xsplash freeze the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
Logo and throbber images off-center
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420495
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I have two monitors and an nvidia card. I'll test this out as soon as I
have time to setup the TwinView fu again.
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
New splash looks wrong
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
--
Ping pong mode doesn't show last frame
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420249
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I'm having trouble understanding what change you're proposing now. Can
you restate exactly what it is you want to see changed?
--
Xsplash only uses the default wallpaper during transition to desktop.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412598
You received this bug notification because you are a
This is just styling stuff. It's not final, we're waiting on the final
media from the design team. This stuff was just used temporarily for
feature freeze. Fear not, we're going to try to make it look good. :)
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Won't Fix
** Changed in: xsplash
Oh cool, thanks for noticing that. We'll be getting finalized media
from the design team really soon and we'll get this resolved. Thanks
for pointing it out.
--
There are 51 frames in xsplash-throbber.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420217
You received this bug notification because you are
The new startup infrastructure will be landing in Karmic soon.. but
basically, X11 will be starting earlier than before and you're going to
be seeing xsplash for longer than you're seeing it now. You won't be
seeing usplash in most cases.
Design team will be providing updated media in the near
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Xsplash flickers and uses the gtk_color_scheme's window background color
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
xsplash crashed with signal 5 in g_type_create_instance()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Invalid
--
[i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
So you can now change the background that's used on the command-line.
We will not be supporting using the user's desktop background in Karmic
(or probably ever) because it will involve making connections to gconf
and reading keys out of it, and we're trying to minimize this type of
thing in order
Uhh, also forgot to mention.. the transition should be smoother now
since xsplash now works to avoid 'flickering' between the splash screen
and the desktop background by using some XComposite related hacks.
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Won't Fix
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu)
Well, we can use a different image for the different xsplash stages if
we want to. For example, look at
/etc/gdm/Init/Default (before gdm greeter shows)
and
/etc/gdm/PreSession/Default (after gdm greeter, going into user
session)
We can set a different background image on the command line
dbus-send --system --type=method_call --dest=com.ubuntu.BootCurtain
/com/ubuntu/BootCurtain com.ubuntu.BootCurtain.SignalLoaded
string:nautilus
dbus-send --system --type=method_call --dest=com.ubuntu.BootCurtain
/com/ubuntu/BootCurtain com.ubuntu.BootCurtain.SignalLoaded string
:gnome-panel
--
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
Xsplash flickers and uses the gtk_color_scheme's window background color
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Also affects: xsplash
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: xsplash
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
Xsplash flickers and uses
The proposal was to allow renaming by clicking on a file, not to copy
Windows's implementation exactly -- if the implementation is poor in
Windows, that doesn't mean it would be in Nautilus. For example, Mac OS
X allows click to rename, and I've never heard a Mac user complain that
this feature
Some say, if we implement this as it is in Windows it will not work
well; others say, if we implement it a different way, new users will
have trouble with the difference. This is missing the point -- users
want click-to-rename because they find it more convenient and usable
than the dialog-driven
But this would be beyond the scope of papercuts, such a feature or any
other mentioned here need to be requested upstream.
*Any discussions here is not going to fix or solve this problem* , it
needs to be done upstream.
Upstream has already made it pretty clear that they're not interested in
Fixed in bzr revno 39. Will be in the next release.
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
xsplash crashed with signal 5 in g_type_create_instance()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
xsplash doesn't timeout to reveal the user session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412455
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
FYI, you can't just run it from the terminal because it needs to use the
dbus system bus.
That said, it should also exit gracefully and tell you not to do this.
;) So I'll get this fixed in the next release.
** Changed in: xsplash
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cody Russell (bratsche
There is one advantage about my idea that I perhaps failed to make
clear enough in my original comment: with different emblems the idea
provides for both cut and copy actions (which is not shown in my
mockup). Also, there are probably already provisions in Nautilus for
handling such emblems; at
So I'm sitting in the hackfest room downstairs at the desktop summit in
Gran Canaria now and talked to Alex Larsson, one of the Nautilus
maintainers, about this and he said this has been proposed many times in
the past and has been rejected. I don't think Ubuntu wants to be
carrying patches
If I'm reading the patch correctly, it seems that you're changing the
response types in the buttons but not in the actual dialog response
handling.
dialog = self.gtk.MessageDialog(parent=self.window_main,
type=self.gtk.MESSAGE_WARNING,
-
Okay cool, I didn't look at the full code only the patch. I'm at Guadec
and the network isn't responding very well, so I never got to respond to
your actual question.. so here is my only other thought on the patch.
+ #FIXME: is there a better way to set the title AND have a stock icon?
+
I find the cut icons very confusing. They exist on different corners of
the icons, and they exist on both dimmed icons and non-dimmed icons.
The only question I have about David's mockup is how prelight/mouseover
affects a dimmed icon. Right now when you mouseover an icon it lightens
up a bit,
I'm not exactly sure how my comment is not as useful as the others just
because I have an opposing opinion.
Saying it's an unbelievably stupid UI design isn't in itself useful,
in my opinion. There are other people who seem to say it's a good idea,
so if it just comes down to taking one person's
Just to be clear, I'm not meaning to say your opinion isn't useful.
It's good to know that people have had bad experiences with this sort of
feature in the past. The only thing is that I want to avoid this
getting too heated with strong terms like unbelievably stupid. I
don't think that sort of
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310931
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #310931
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310931
--
The keybord cannot be used for fast access to an item of a pop-up menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389929
You received this bug notification
A potential issue with this is, how will it behave when you have single
click to activate preference enabled?
--
Cannot rename by clicking on a file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48671
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
I tested in Vista to see how it behaves when single-click-to-activate is
enabled, and it appears that you can't put it into rename mode when that
option is set. Only when double-click is set. Our solution should
probably do the same.
--
Cannot rename by clicking on a file
Regarding the where in the selection you click issue that someone
mentioned above, I just tested on Vista and it does distinguish between
clicking on an icon and clicking on the label.
I tested first on the desktop, where I'm using an icon layout. If I
click the icon to select the item, move the
I disagree that there should be an option hidden away in some preference
page somewhere. If there's some question as to whether it's a good idea
or not, the next step might be some kind of usability study. Adding a
checkbox in a preference page is the we don't know the solution kind
of solution
So, my mom's Ubuntu Hardy (yeah I know, old) machine has this problem
and I took a look at it this morning. I think it works now. I changed
one line in the configure file for the libcamel1.2-whatever package:
LARGEFILE_CFLAGS=-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
gets changed to:
This was made against the Hardy package, since my mom's machine is using
LTS.
** Attachment added: Proposed patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27496531/offsetbits64.diff
--
2 gb max inbox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I looked at the configure file for Jaunty and it looks like this should
already be fixed in Jaunty. I ran configure to check the output and I
saw:
checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64
Which is what we want. So probably my fix only applies to releases
older than
C: Wow, thanks so much for getting a PPA build of this so fast! That's
great.
Luis: I probably have over 2gb on my Jaunty desktop, but it's in a box
for the next few days since I've been moving. So I can't actually
verify it right now. I just took a peek at the configure.in file for
e-d-s in
The problem is that it shouldn't be using gtk_window_get_size() this
way. It's not a very reliable way to get the size, especially the it's
being used here since the mainloop hasn't even been hit yet and the
window doesn't exist yet.
The most reliable way to do this will be to get the size from
401 - 500 of 688 matches
Mail list logo
