[Bug 564049] Re: Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart with less than or equal to 1GB of RAM

2010-04-16 Thread Cyberkilla
It fixed it for me too, yet I have 2GB RAM. My bug report (the one this forked from) is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase-runtime/+bug/563021 Strigi is now running at startup. -- Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart with less than or equal to 1GB of RAM

[Bug 563021] Re: Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart

2010-04-16 Thread Cyberkilla
The bug is fixed for me, somehow.. The bug report mentioned in comment #10 is supposedly only affecting people with =1GB RAM, but I have 2GB and the fix worked for me too. Strigi is now running at startup. -- Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563021 You received

[Bug 563021] Re: Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart

2010-04-15 Thread Cyberkilla
Just an FYI: I have 2GB RAM installed on this computer; the patch /shouldn't/ affect me. @Jonathan Thomas: Is there anything I can do to check whether nepomukservicestub has crashed? The usual places seem to be devoid of any evidence. -- Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart

[Bug 563021] Re: Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart

2010-04-15 Thread Cyberkilla
@Jonathan Thomas: There are no crash reports in /var/crash for anything except plymouthd and a few GIMP crashes. -- Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 563021] [NEW] Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart

2010-04-14 Thread Cyberkilla
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-runtime Recently (within the past few weeks) Strigi has stopped autostarting at login. In the Desktop Search dialog, the option Enable Strigi Desktop File Indexer is unchecked. If I check it again and click apply, Strigi starts and the icon

[Bug 563021] Re: Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart

2010-04-14 Thread Cyberkilla
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44149722/Dependencies.txt -- Nepomuk Strigi does not autostart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-runtime in

[Bug 535014] Re: Ubuntu logo appears to be slipping down

2010-03-10 Thread Cyberkilla
I have noticed this too. 1440x900 screen. -- Ubuntu logo appears to be slipping down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 535108] Re: Plymouth starts late

2010-03-10 Thread Cyberkilla
I have the same problem (though the blank screen period is a bit shorter on my computer). I get an fsck message for two partitions and a couple of lines about a dodgy webcam driver. Then Plymouth loads. I don't get console messages overlaid onto the splash screen, but they're there before it

[Bug 456637] Re: Please consider turning powermizer OFF

2010-03-09 Thread Cyberkilla
There have been several releases of the nVidia driver that have this issue for me. The only way to get it working in linux is to disable powermizer. It works perfectly fine with the latest Vista video driver. I have an nVidia GeForce 8400M GT btw. -- Please consider turning powermizer OFF

[Bug 533047] Re: Keyboard layout chosen at install not applied to TTYs

2010-03-09 Thread Cyberkilla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524439 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524439 I have a similar key layout problem. Your bug report may be related/duplicate to this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/524439 Someone on ubuntuforums pointed me to it a few days

[Bug 532659] Re: new theme not applied

2010-03-08 Thread Cyberkilla
Pavel Rojtberg: I'm having the exact same problem and I think I manually set the Karmic theme in the Beta before it was added officially. -- new theme not applied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2010-03-06 Thread Cyberkilla
I keep being told that it's because these icons aren't using the new GTKStatusIcon, but that seems like a cop out to me. A few releases ago (possibly Intrepid) this problem appeared in every tray icon. It seems to be true that some applications have fixed the issue by using GTKStatusIcon, but I

[Bug 525224] Re: iotop misses CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT in kernel

2010-03-01 Thread Cyberkilla
Affects me too, using Ubuntu Lucid Lynx Alpha 3. -- iotop misses CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT in kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 68213] Re: Column customizations not remembered

2009-11-21 Thread Cyberkilla
Another confirmation. Deleting the key fixed it for me too. This has been annoying me for 3 releases. -- Column customizations not remembered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 11222] Re: Add auto-organize support to Rhythmbox

2009-11-16 Thread Cyberkilla
It is a bit pointless to use a fancy GUI music manager when you still have to maintain the integrity of your library folder yourself. If the tracks are sorted into folders by artist and album, those folders should update to reflect any changes in the metadata of the tracks themselves. If this is

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2009-11-09 Thread Cyberkilla
@Chow Loong Jin: The colour behind the icons is the same as the colour of the panel, if you remove any background image or transparency. With regards to Opera, perhaps they don't _need_ to get involved. This change happened outside of the applications affected. The mechanism they all use to

[Bug 346095] Re: notify-osd doesn't honor my preference

2009-11-08 Thread Cyberkilla
@John Ledbetter: Are you seriously demonstrating that this entire argument could have been defused with ~40 lines of code, which amount to a few constants and a switch block? Over six months of arguing over nothing. How disappointing. -- notify-osd doesn't honor my preference

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2009-11-07 Thread Cyberkilla
@Chow Loong Jin: Very interesting. I wonder what can be done to call more attention to this bug. It seems unusual that such an active bug report would receive so little feedback/questions from developers. -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

[Bug 456637] Re: Please consider turning powermizer OFF

2009-11-04 Thread Cyberkilla
Have you tried the 190.xx drivers yourself? They don't fix the problem for me:) Btw, I've been using the workaround for over a week now, and it's great! Compiz doesn't stutter when I flip windows, the GPU doesn't get any hotter than normal (according to NVidia Settings)... -- Please consider

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-11-01 Thread Cyberkilla
@maxim(Feng Liu): I can't see how that would make a difference. Isn't usplash loaded _before_ kdm/gdm? -- Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2009-10-31 Thread Cyberkilla
Apparently it is related to the object applications use to create their status icon. I've heard mentions of GTKStatusIcon (supposedly the solution), GTKTrayIcon and something about an eggicon. Presumably, these are all interfaces to make the notification area icons, with GTKStatusIcon tending

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-31 Thread Cyberkilla
Is there something we have to do (besides waiting) to get a response to this bug report? -- Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-30 Thread Cyberkilla
I already have the 185 drivers and the problem persists. -- Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 387833] Re: Evolution should minimize to Indicator Applet

2009-10-25 Thread Cyberkilla
@Dominik George: At what point does _anyone_ on this thread mention that it is possible to hide the window without closing it? That's right, nowhere. So don't get smart with me. -- Evolution should minimize to Indicator Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387833 You received this bug

[Bug 387833] Re: Evolution should minimize to Indicator Applet

2009-10-25 Thread Cyberkilla
@Dominik George: I don't think we quite understand each other. I was merely pointing out to the other guy that it is still possible and does not require Evolution to be split into UI and back-end mail daemons. The reason being, you should be able to hide the window without destroying it.

[Bug 101980] Re: liferea icon in notification-area not transparent when showing number of new items

2009-10-25 Thread Cyberkilla
I can confirm this issue too. Karmic RC. -- liferea icon in notification-area not transparent when showing number of new items https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/101980 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 101980] Re: liferea icon in notification-area not transparent when showing number of new items

2009-10-25 Thread Cyberkilla
Oops, sorry, I didn't see that it was already fixed. Perhaps Karmic doesn't have the most recent version in its repository. -- liferea icon in notification-area not transparent when showing number of new items https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/101980 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-24 Thread Cyberkilla
In the following post, I have pasted the output of sudo hwinfo --framebuffer. It shows the available mode settings. At 1440x900, it only shows 8 and 24bit depth. Most of the other resolutions have 16 bit also. http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=8157195postcount=5 I don't know if this has

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-24 Thread Cyberkilla
Hello, You wouldn't see any problem - you have a CRT. CRT monitors do not have a native resolution. LCD monitors look horrific when they automatically upscale a tiny image onto a larger resolution with a completely different aspect ratio :-) CRT is an obsolete technology now. I haven't seen a

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-24 Thread Cyberkilla
Sorry for all of these comments! For some reason, after a few updates and a bit of messing around with usplash.conf, I have it running at 1024x768 without being all stretched. Don't get me wrong, it is still blurred because it isn't the native resolution. Still, it is half decent now. The actual

[Bug 387833] Re: Evolution should minimize to Indicator Applet

2009-10-24 Thread Cyberkilla
Can't you just hide the window? I mean, if alltray can do it... Can't the entire window continue to be open, but unmapped and taken out of the taskbar? There is no need to actually close the window. In Windows, you can hide a form in visual basic without actually closing it. Surely there is

[Bug 437429] Re: Cannot prevent login sound

2009-10-23 Thread Cyberkilla
It wouldn't be so bad if the sound effect didn't play 3 second before the login box even appeared. There isn't even a confusing command-line way to resolve this, it seems. -- Cannot prevent login sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437429 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-23 Thread Cyberkilla
Except, it's the wrong resolution, Tiefflieger. Surely your screen is larger than that. Mine is 1440x900, so it's widescreen. Having usplash drop to 1024x768 gives me an blurred, slightly horizontally stretched Ubuntu icon. -- Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-23 Thread Cyberkilla
linusr: That seems to be the underlying theme of this bug report, I agree. I get the impression that nobody is listening to use any more;) Anyway, I think I should also point out that I have an NVidia GeForce 8400M GT graphics card, using the proprietary drivers. However, I was under the

[Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed

2009-10-22 Thread Cyberkilla
I get this error in Karmic too. The Ubuntu logo in the middle of the screen looks stretched horizontally and a bit pixelated. I have a 1440x900 screen too. -- Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67826 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2009-10-22 Thread Cyberkilla
I'm having this issue too. Ubuntu Karmic Beta. ** Attachment added: Comparison between default panel and panel with image background set. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34141884/tmp.png -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

[Bug 456637] Re: Please consider turning powermizer OFF

2009-10-21 Thread Cyberkilla
I have a Sony Vaio VGN-AR41E with an NVidia GeForce 8400M GT graphics card. Your problem is almost identical to my own. No driver newer than 185.18.14 will work properly. The moment I reach the GDM login screen, artefacts appear. The more I move the mouse cursor, menus, or (especially) drag

[Bug 429599] Re: hardcoded secure shell key location

2009-09-23 Thread Cyberkilla
I have noticed this too. I was concerned that some guy called nate had put a key on my computer allowing him to SSH to it. Don't laugh:) -- hardcoded secure shell key location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 195605] Re: Sound not configured properly on Sony Vaios using snd_hda_intel

2009-08-22 Thread Cyberkilla
Excellent! Confirmed! It's nice when it feels like progress has been made. -- Sound not configured properly on Sony Vaios using snd_hda_intel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 195605] Re: Sound not configured properly on Sony Vaios using snd_hda_intel

2009-08-20 Thread Cyberkilla
I have the same problem as Michael Doube (comment #40). I am running a Sony Vaio VGN-AR41E. Plugging in headphones will mute main speakers, but no sound can be hear from the headphones either. The only solution is to specifically choose the headphone slot as the output. This laptop also has an

[Bug 277589] Re: sony brighness on a geforce series older than 8 (nvclock works fine)

2009-08-20 Thread Cyberkilla
Hello, I have a Sony Vaio VGN-AR41E, which has an NVidia GeForce 8400M GT graphics card. Smartdimmer works for me, and the Fn keys work now too (as of Karmic Alpha 4). Will your fix work for me? I do not see my card in the .fdi file. -- sony brighness on a geforce series older than 8 (nvclock

[Bug 277589] Re: sony brighness on a geforce series older than 8 (nvclock works fine)

2009-08-20 Thread Cyberkilla
Sorry, I didn't realise this wasn't for my card. Still, 8400M GT doesn't work either. -- sony brighness on a geforce series older than 8 (nvclock works fine) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 220696] Re: Connection to SSH via file browser disconnects

2009-07-15 Thread Cyberkilla
I get almost identical messages. I'm running Jaunty. Steps for me to get this error: - Mount a remote server via SSH, as explained in the bug report. - Hibernate/suspend computer for the night. - Resume in the morning and notice that the nautilus windows showing the remote folder closes itself

[Bug 378880] Re: In Docky, order of apps change whenever I summon GNOME Do

2009-06-30 Thread Cyberkilla
FYI, I have this behaviour too, but ONLY when there are no icons on the dock. What I mean is, if I remove all dock icons, leaving only the icons of running applications, the swap around when I summon gnome-do (by clicking the GNOME Do icon, or WIN+SPACE). The moment I add even a single shortcut