[Bug 1444785] Re: grub2 installation failed during system install

2015-04-15 Thread Eric Chaskes
This bug is not valid. Found is UbiquitySyslog: E: Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 14.10 _Utopic Unicorn_ - Release amd64 (20141022.1)/pool/main/g/grub2/grub-efi- amd64-bin_2.02~beta2-15_amd64.deb Hash Sum mismatch Event though I had reformatted the installation usb stick before burning the

[Bug 1444785] [NEW] grub2 installation failed during system install

2015-04-15 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: Asus X551-MAV-EB-01. Fast boot and secure boot are disabled. CSM is enabled. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: ubiquity 2.20.0 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-23.31-generic 3.16.4 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8

[Bug 1431366] Re: cups-browsed assert failure: *** Error in `/usr/sbin/cups-browsed': malloc(): memory corruption: 0x0000000001fa09b0 ***

2015-03-26 Thread Eric Chaskes
** Attachment added: cups-browsed.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1431366/+attachment/4357513/+files/cups-browsed.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1430971] Re: Users not warned about switch to fcitx and no instructions are given

2015-03-12 Thread Eric Chaskes
I did a fresh install, then manually upgraded packages in the dist- upgrade one by one to isolate the ones pulling in fcitx. indicator-keyboard did not pull in fcitx. It was unity-control-center and unity-settings-daemon that are each trying to pull in the fcitx packages. -- You received this

[Bug 1430971] [NEW] Users not warned about switch to fcitx and no instructions are given

2015-03-11 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: Received the newest update to 0.0.0+15.04.20150310 a few minutes ago. There is a significant change to behavior with the change to fcitx from ibus. Users, however, are given no warning and no instructions on how to get their preferred input methods set up again. This has

[Bug 1430971] Re: Users not warned about switch to fcitx and no instructions are given

2015-03-11 Thread Eric Chaskes
Thanks for your quick response. I was running Vivid on 2 laptops. I did a dist-upgrade on each of them and had the experience described above on both laptops. Additional details: 1. ibus and ibus-pinyin were installed during system installation as normal. 2. I added and then removed

[Bug 1430971] Re: Users not warned about switch to fcitx and no instructions are given

2015-03-11 Thread Eric Chaskes
I've already removed all fcitx packages except fcitx-data, libfcitx- config4, libfcitx-glient0, libfcitx-utils0 (all required by Unity Control Center, as you know) and reset the system IM back to Ibus; so I'm back to normal. I didn't really question the fcitx packages in the upgrade since it's

[Bug 1426137] Re: [LENOVO S10-3] suspend/resume failure [non-free: wl]

2015-03-11 Thread Eric Chaskes
Additional information: 1. Before the 3.10.x line, the computer required hpet=disable highres=off nohz=off in order to resume. 2. With the 3.10.x kernel, suspend/resume worked out of the box. 3. Suspend/resume still works with Debian Sid (3.16.x) and Fedora 21 (3.17.x). 4. The grub command

[Bug 1426137] [NEW] [LENOVO S10-3] suspend/resume failure [non-free: wl]

2015-02-26 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: Computer would not resume after using suspend fn key. Computer would sometimes think wifi was blocked by hardware switch after this. Had to pull cmos battery to restore. This seems to be a regression to behavior that went away with the 3.10 kernel. ProblemType: KernelOops

[Bug 1389081] [NEW] Manual partitioning shows Debian dialog about formatting partition mounted as root and swap

2014-11-03 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: Release 14.10; Ubiquity 2.20.0 Using manual partitioning on an Asus X201E (efi), I mounted a pre- existing partition to be formatted as root. After clicking Install Now, I got the warning dialog that is typical when installing Debian that both the / partition and the swap

[Bug 1389081] Re: Manual partitioning shows Debian dialog about formatting partitions mounted as root and swap

2014-11-03 Thread Eric Chaskes
** Summary changed: - Manual partitioning shows Debian dialog about formatting partition mounted as root and swap + Manual partitioning shows Debian dialog about formatting partitions mounted as root and swap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1314886] Re: Changing user from no password login to disabled leaves user in no password login group

2014-06-06 Thread Eric Chaskes
This change fixed the bug for me. Installed version: unity-control- center 14.04.3+14.04.20140604-0ubuntu1 Test case: 1. Used unity-control-center to configure a user to log in without password. User was added to the nopasswdlogin group and was able to log in without password. 2. Used

[Bug 1317696] [NEW] Upstream dconf db settings for Ibus do not work correctly with Ubuntu

2014-05-08 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: Ubuntu has changed how it handles input switching and no longer relies on the Ibus hotkey/trigger settings. The default upstream Ibus keybindings for input switching, however, are still installed unchanged in Ubuntu. As a result, Control+Space, the default Ibus keybinding

[Bug 1314886] [NEW] Changing user from no password login to disabled leaves user in no password login group

2014-04-30 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: If a user is set to login without a password and subsequently the account is disabled, the user is not removed from the nopassword login group. The result is that the user can still login even though the admin has disabled to account. This is a security issue and is present

[Bug 1169054] Re: Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does remove user from nopasswdlogin group

2014-04-24 Thread Eric Chaskes
After additional research, I realized that this bug is invalid against accountsservice. Instead, the bug is in Unity-Control-Center, which fails to change the login mode when locking an account. A user who is already in the nopasswordlogin group, therefore, will not be dropped from the

[Bug 1302840] Re: Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized

2014-04-05 Thread Eric Chaskes
This bug seems to have been resolved. See Amal's comment that additional updates took card of it for him. Plus, when I did another install, the same updates/upgrades came through without causing a problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1302230] Re: error in accountsservice/user.c fails to remove user from nopasswdlogin when mode is set to none

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
Thank you for the reply. I agree that the line is in fact correct. I see I mistakenly thought the mode had already changed, but that is not done until after exiting the current block. But here is how the bug is working: Setting the mode to none causes the user to be added to the nopasswdlogin

[Bug 1302840] [NEW] Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: Update manager offered a partial upgrade, including Kernel 3.13.0.22.26 and removal of packages related to UbuntuOne. After starting the upgrade, update manager showed a dialog stating You don't have permission to perform this action. The upgrade continued after clearing the

[Bug 1302840] Re: Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
After a fresh install and apt-get upgrade, packages left for dist- upgrade were: The following packages will be REMOVED: ubuntu-sso-client-qt ubuntuone-control-panel-qt The following NEW packages will be installed: libcgmanager0 liboxideqt-qmlplugin liboxideqtcore0 libwayland-egl1-mesa

[Bug 1302840] Re: Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
After using a series of apt-get upgrade and apt-get install in order to avoid using dist-upgrade, I was able to perform all of the installs/removals/upgrades without causing the problem with user authentication. Very similar reports are starting to show up on AskUbuntu. It seems that doing the

[Bug 1302840] Re: Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
Additional note: The system drop-down under the gear icon did not show me as logged in when I was. This would explain the failure of the gui function to authenticate me, but I'm still not sure what caused that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1302840] Re: Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
** Package changed: ubuntu = update-manager (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302840 Title: Upgrade in 14.04 causes admin user to not be recognized To manage notifications

[Bug 1169054] Re: Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does remove user from nopasswdlogin group

2014-04-03 Thread Eric Chaskes
This bug is still present in 14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169054 Title: Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does remove user from nopasswdlogin group To

[Bug 1169054] Re: Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does remove user from nopasswdlogin group

2014-04-03 Thread Eric Chaskes
This bug title is worded incorrectly. More accurate would be: Changing user setting in User Accounts from Login without password to Disable this account does not remove the user from the nopasswdlogin group. The user remains in the nopasswdlogin group only when going from Login without password

[Bug 1299309] Re: grub2 efi failed to install

2014-03-30 Thread Eric Chaskes
Thank you for the quick reply. I had in fact created a new partition table on that usb and made a new partition before burning the iso, but something must have gone wrong or perhaps there is another problem with that usb. I reformatted a different usb for the installer and this time the install

[Bug 1299309] Re: grub2 efi failed to install

2014-03-29 Thread Eric Chaskes
I managed to install 14.04 by creating a separate /boot partition. I still got the error message that grub-efi-amd64-signed failed to install; but opening gparted before closing the installer, I notcied the /boot had about 150 MB on it. The system EFI boot menu does not show any entry for 14.04,

[Bug 1299309] Re: grub2 efi failed to install

2014-03-29 Thread Eric Chaskes
This is an Asus X201E that came with 12.04 as an OEM install. There are (presumably) no issues with Windows EFI involved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299309 Title: grub2 efi

[Bug 1299309] Re: grub2 efi failed to install

2014-03-29 Thread Eric Chaskes
I tried again and looked at /var/log/syslog before closing the installer. It states there was a hashsum mismatch when it tried to install grub-efi-amd64-signed_1.32%2b2.02~beta2-7_amd64.deb (may not be the exact deb name) from /cdrom. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1299309] [NEW] grub2 efi failed to install

2014-03-28 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: no additional info ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ubiquity 2.17.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-19.40-generic 3.13.6 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.13.3-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.339 Date: Fri Mar 28

[Bug 871891] Re: Resume doesn't work on IdeaPad S10-3 with N10 video

2013-06-25 Thread Eric Chaskes
@dimistris-ha I believe the options you list are for the 2.6 kernel. My S10-3 only suspends and resumes when I use: hpet=disable highres=off nohz=off I have this set in Ubuntu 12.04 (kernel 3.2.x), Ubuntu 13.04 (kernel 3.8.x), and openSUSE 12.3 (kernel 3.7.x). -- You received this bug

[Bug 1091791] Re: [LENOVO 20060] suspend/resume failure [non-free: wl]

2013-01-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
I continued to have this problem on my S10-3 running 12.10 3.5.0-21-generic. I installed 3.8-rc2 i386 from http://kernel.ubuntu.com /~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.8-rc2-raring/ and suspend now works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1091791] Re: [LENOVO 20060] suspend/resume failure [non-free: wl]

2013-01-04 Thread Eric Chaskes
I tried suspend/resume several times before adding the comment, but then realized I woke it up right away every time. After some more attempts, I realized that it's still not working right. It no longer freezes on resume, but now it is not staying asleep. After suspend, it wakes up a second or two

[Bug 1085265] Re: Mutliple session choices extend beyond the bottom of the screen

2012-12-29 Thread Eric Chaskes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1071301 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071301 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1071301 Can't change the desktop environment in lightdm when more than one desktop is installed and the ok button is outside the visible screen. -- You

[Bug 1085265] [NEW] Mutliple session choices extend beyond the bottom of the screen

2012-11-30 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: 12.10 unity-greeter 12.10.4-0ubuntu5 I expected an easy choice of desktop session after installing multiple desktop environments. Instead, making a choice is very difficult. The list of available desktop environments in unity-greeter does not resize itself or provide easy

[Bug 1064545] Re: package-data-downloader crashed with KeyError in convert(): 'paquetes'

2012-10-09 Thread Eric Chaskes
a dialog popped up titled update information (?) showing only the string (null) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064545 Title: package-data-downloader crashed with KeyError in

[Bug 994337] [NEW] package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2012-05-03 Thread Eric Chaskes
Public bug reported: 12.04 ubuntu-restricted-extras 57 expected ms font package to install ms font package did not install ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux

[Bug 994337] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2012-05-03 Thread Eric Chaskes
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994337 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error