[Bug 1409813] [NEW] nvidia-331-updates 331.113-0ubuntu0.1: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build

2015-01-12 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: Kernel at time of update: 3.16.0-28 (updated to 3.16.0-29 in same update) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nvidia-331-updates 331.113-0ubuntu0.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-28.38-generic 3.16.7-ckt1 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-28-generic x86_64

[Bug 1386551] Re: Weird HW exceptions after upgrading to 14.10

2014-12-28 Thread LeForgeron
I got the same query, but for ata20.0 It might be tied to the discovery of a dvd-writer on the sata cable. At least it seems to follow with attaching scsi 19 as sg10 (I have no abort, but still a red exception and cmd for ata20.00 [4.409876] scsi 12:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA

[Bug 657628] Re: sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives

2014-12-28 Thread LeForgeron
Still true with Ubuntu 14.10: only 4 entries in storage of sysinfo (0.7-9) Might be a feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657628 Title: sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 0x98400)

2013-10-29 Thread LeForgeron
Tested in saucy, as reported at #44, ppa works fine. (Asrock bios, if it matters) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 0x98400) To

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 0x98400)

2013-10-24 Thread LeForgeron
I tested the proposed ppa: it works and solves the issue of running memtest86+ from the local hard disk at boot time. Good job. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error:

[Bug 1151766] [NEW] break with too many }'s and got EOF when C++11 enum class is used

2013-03-07 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: Whenever an enum uses the C++11 feature of enum class, the parsing of the file is interrupted (remaining of file is not processed, at least on longer file some functions are not documented) Sample test (file aa.hpp): namespace Foo { class Bar { public: Bar() {}

[Bug 1045052] Re: slow boot (exe=fsck) with root partition on md

2012-10-01 Thread LeForgeron
A bit of update: since 28 September 2012, the slowdown is gone. Previous boot (same day) with kernel 3.2.0-31-generic #50 (Sep 7 16:16:45 UTC 2012 x86_64) First fine boot with kernel 3.2.0-32-generic #51 (Sep 26 21:33:09 UTC 2012 x86_64) (May be it is not related to kernel version: on 26

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-09-03 Thread LeForgeron
Now running 7.0.34, it does not seem to leak on file descriptor so far (already 10 tasks done). A collision on disk full (well, allocated space) is probably another issue (best tracked in its own bugreport ?) 7.0.33 was fine too. My check is : $ sudo lsof -p `pidof boinc` The last file

[Bug 1045052] [NEW] slow boot (exe=fsck) with root partition on md

2012-09-02 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: Hello, This was initialy asked as a question, which get answered with a suggestion to report a bug. My system is currently slow to boot (bootchart reports about 70s in exe, between mdadm+udevadm and udev+udevadm : e.g. from start of record, 5.5s to reach end of modprobe,

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-07-25 Thread LeForgeron
Greeting happy people, I tried to downgrade from costamagnagianfranco to precise-proposed , by forcing the version, but libboinc is not available on that tag. I wonder if it matter. Installation in progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-07-25 Thread LeForgeron
Hello again Verification done with: boinc 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu012.04.1 (precise-proposed) boinc-manager ditto boinc-client ditto libboinc 7.0.31+dfsg-0-875-precise1 (now) (only available in that version) It's ok. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-07-16 Thread LeForgeron
Impact : when opened (oneiric), the bug was/is as described: a long time running boinc system would finally fails to compute more boinc work unit as every computed work unit leads to a leak of 1 file descriptor in the boinc main daemon (irrelevant of the kind of project subscribed). The faster

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-05-22 Thread LeForgeron
Others are working fine too (ABC Collatz). No regression on Einstein (GPU only), milkyway(GPU only) nor sudoku(CPU). Fine for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968021 Title: boinc

[Bug 730404] Re: wifi and webcam drivers crashed completely in normal use apps

2012-05-15 Thread LeForgeron
Small update since 12.04: seems now fixed (system has been reinstalled with 11.10). It might been have due to an old library in some part of the system (or a configuration file). For my part, it now works fine on the original multicore system (no change in hardware). -- You received this bug

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-05-15 Thread LeForgeron
Seems now working with 7.0.27 of ppa; (but menu has the same issue as official release) At least sudoku does not exit immediately, other work unit in progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-04-15 Thread LeForgeron
Same issue with 7.0.25 as with 7.0.23 24 : computation error for all units (only wasted 18 WU of sudoku that time) that need the CPU. Maybe the issue is fixed, but if the computation fails, there is no point in upgrading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-04-05 Thread LeForgeron
Well, Dear Locutus... I did. It wasted at least 12 working units of Sudoku, all in errors, even after restarting the project. Milkyway on cuda seems happy. ABC get wasted too, about 12 working units too. I did not dare to check other projects, the damage are already enough. I won't retry that.

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-04-04 Thread LeForgeron
Local conclusion/workaround : I reverted to oneiric version, and added a crontab entry for root to restart boinc-client everyday. 0 16 * * * /usr/bin/sudo -s /etc/init.d/boinc-client restart Best regards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-04-02 Thread LeForgeron
It seems that 7.0.15 does not like being run without X session ( ?! ?) ** Attachment added: Stderrdae.txt, from 7.0.15, X session closed around 17:00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/968021/+attachment/2987079/+files/stderrdae.txt -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-04-02 Thread LeForgeron
And here the ends of stdoutdae.txt (same issue: closed X session around 17:00... no work done) ** Attachment added: stdoutdae.txt, Session closed about 17:00, no more work https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/968021/+attachment/2987113/+files/stdoutdae.txt -- You received

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-03-30 Thread LeForgeron
I'm not using ssh session. So, I'm not able to verify that part. If comparaison can matters, the Lucid version does NOT show the same behaviour as Oneiric (stop after a while with md5 complaining about too many opened files). best regards (other test with 7.0.23 in progress soon) -- You

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-03-30 Thread LeForgeron
Well, 7.0.23 seems to have issue running sudoku : the tasks went quickly as error. Other projects might have too, but they are far longer (sudoku take about 10 to 20 minutes per tasks, other projects need 5 to 7 hours) Reverting to 7.0.15, sudoku seems fine. (both were tried with freshly

[Bug 968021] [NEW] boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-03-29 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: There seems to be a file descriptor leaks in the boinc process (client side). After a few days of fine loading the system, it would suddenly stop working. Relaunching it is usually ok (but actively managing a system running boinc is rather not a decent solution). Clue with

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-03-29 Thread LeForgeron
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968021 Title: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt

2012-03-29 Thread LeForgeron
I tested the PPA version: far better, the number of opened files seems to stay at 22 (rather than climbing to hundreds as tasks are performed) (22 or less...). I doubt the original issue would be caused by the project, as projects seems to have their own process, each new task being performed in

[Bug 730404] Re: wifi and webcam drivers crashed completely in normal use apps

2011-12-28 Thread LeForgeron
I do not know for the wifi part, but using a webcam on a multicore system (here a i7 980X) with any of cheese, gmail+ video plugins in mozilla, or even skype, ends up with first some locking in the video+audio/application then a full system crash. It's rather random: can happen after a few seconds

[Bug 671373] Re: xonix crashes on high scores table opening

2011-12-28 Thread LeForgeron
Might be related to 809038 : user should be in games group (default user is not in games) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671373 Title: xonix crashes on high scores table opening To

[Bug 809038] Re: xonix crash after a single game

2011-12-28 Thread LeForgeron
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 671373 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671373 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 671373 xonix crashes on high scores table opening -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 657628] Re: sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives

2011-12-28 Thread LeForgeron
Still valid in Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric): only 4 entries in storage of sysinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657628 Title: sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives To manage

[Bug 809038] [NEW] xonix crash after a single game

2011-07-11 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: xonix: cannot reopen high score file *** glibc detected *** xonix: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x02065270 *** the high score file is /var/cache/xonix/xonix.scores, but its rights are 664 (root/games), so default user (which is not in games group) can still

[Bug 809038] Dependencies.txt

2011-07-11 Thread LeForgeron
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809038/+attachment/2202984/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809038

[Bug 657628] [NEW] sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives

2010-10-10 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sysinfo On Lucid, sysinfo 0.7-3ubuntu1 displays only the first 4 entries for storage. Other additionnal hard drives are not shown. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: sysinfo 0.7-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 657628] Re: sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives

2010-10-10 Thread LeForgeron
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657628/+attachment/1681349/+files/Dependencies.txt -- sysinfo reports only the 4 first drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 615591] Re: Sensors applet doesn't show HDD temperature

2010-08-22 Thread LeForgeron
** Attachment added: Requested picture of Preferences/Capteur https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sensors-applet/+bug/615591/+attachment/1510008/+files/Capture-Pr%C3%A9f%C3%A9rences%20du%20moniteur%20mat%C3%A9riel.png -- Sensors applet doesn't show HDD temperature

[Bug 615591] Re: Sensors applet doesn't show HDD temperature

2010-08-21 Thread LeForgeron
A small addition, at least for my system: It seems to be a race condition between the applet/daemon/whatever and the start of gnome/system. My configuration is with automatic login : it goes straight from Grub2 to splash screen (with 5 dots) and then open my two displays, loading 3 lines of

[Bug 615591] Re: Sensors applet doesn't show HDD temperature

2010-08-21 Thread LeForgeron
My synaptic reports hddtemp as installed, and no such thing as devkit-disks. (Once again, that is on my system, I do not know about the original reporter) Now, looking for devicekit-disks-doc, I found a transitional package for udisks-doc, and in fact udisks itself (not the doc) is also

[Bug 606168] Re: coretemp from kernel does not support i7 980X

2010-07-21 Thread LeForgeron
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing -- coretemp from kernel does not support i7 980X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 606168] Re: coretemp from kernel does not support i7 980X

2010-07-21 Thread LeForgeron
Tested fine with 2.6.35-999-generic #201007211008 SMP Wed Jul 21 10:09:49 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux ( as provided by http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/current/ today ) 6 core temperature sensors are reported in the gnome-sensors-applet (seems fine too: 6 real cores, numbered

[Bug 606168] [NEW] coretemp from kernel does not support i7 980X

2010-07-16 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: When trying modprobe coretemp, the answer is FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.32-24-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): No such device the dmesg message is [ 835.832126] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 2c (repeated by the number of cores/HT) Search on

[Bug 606168] Re: coretemp from kernel does not support i7 980X

2010-07-16 Thread LeForgeron
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52021262/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52021263/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52021264/ArecordDevices.txt

[Bug 572917] Re: hostname package marked for suppression but is essential

2010-05-27 Thread LeForgeron
This bug can be closed/dismissed. Upgrade has been done successfully. On the action that might have helped: - removing all external sources (doubtful) - removing opera package - removing usplash-themes - removing x-video-server-all (spelling/name ?) package -- hostname package marked for

[Bug 572917] [NEW] hostname package marked for suppression but is essential

2010-05-01 Thread LeForgeron
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade: Le paquet essentiel « hostname » est marqué pour suppression. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release

[Bug 572917] Re: hostname package marked for suppression but is essential

2010-05-01 Thread LeForgeron
** Attachment added: apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46911841/apt.log -- hostname package marked for suppression but is essential https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 572917] Re: hostname package marked for suppression but is essential

2010-05-01 Thread LeForgeron
Forget to say: I'm trying to upgrade from 9.10 to 10.4 -- hostname package marked for suppression but is essential https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 572917] Re: hostname package marked for suppression but is essential

2010-05-01 Thread LeForgeron
** Attachment added: requested file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47035335/status -- hostname package marked for suppression but is essential https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --