Re: [Bug 270206] Re: Rhythmbox should never start minimised to tray

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
I will be out of the office until 9th January, in my absense please contact Nick Tait On 29 Nov 2012, at 19:55, michealPW 270...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Oh my, what a bad workaround. I totaly understand that this behavior is confusing for some people and admittedly it confused my wife (Until

[Bug 270206] Re: Rhythmbox should never start minimised to tray

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
** Attachment added: unnamed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270206/+attachment/3456362/+files/unnamed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270206 Title: Rhythmbox should never start

Re: [Bug 510212] Re: update-manager: no branding. Is it legit?

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
I will be out of the office until 9th January, in my absense please contact Nick Tait On 12 Nov 2012, at 18:14, Luis Alvarado 510...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I love the new icons proposed. They give the feeling that they are similar (Oriented towards software packages/sources). -- You

Re: [Bug 48734] Re: Home permissions too open

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
I will be out of the office until 9th January, in my absense please contact Nick Tait On 14 Nov 2012, at 23:03, Alexander Adam 48...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Sorry but the decision still doesn't make any sense to me. I have to change the default permissions on every installation which is

[Bug 48734] Re: Home permissions too open

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
** Attachment added: unnamed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48734/+attachment/3456365/+files/unnamed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48734 Title: Home permissions too open

Re: [Bug 1059325] Re: ubuntu notification OSD shows SSID instead of connection name

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
I will be out of the office until 9th January, in my absense please contact Nick Tait On 2 Nov 2012, at 10:51, Launchpad Bug Tracker 1059...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)   

Re: [Bug 1059325] Re: ubuntu notification OSD shows SSID instead of connection name

2012-12-10 Thread Marcus Haslam
I will be out of the office until 9th January, in my absense please contact Nick Tait On 30 Oct 2012, at 21:16, Tom Ato 1059...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts   Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: Re: [Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 25 Apr 2011, at 19:26, Jelmer Vernooij 735...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:02 +, Johan Fornander wrote: The source code in the official samba git (source/lib/util.c) seems to use HOST_NAME_MAX and I found an inconsistency

[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
** Attachment added: unnamed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072/+attachment/2233532/+files/unnamed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by

Re: [Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Jul 2011, at 11:31, Paul Wise (Debian) 724...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I guess you didn't notice, but in Debian we are moving to a new font package naming policy. We are getting rid of the format-specific prefix for font packages and going for

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 25 Jun 2011, at 18:47, Dmitrijs Ledkovs 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: running the sscript from bug 788757 against BI is better, cause then you get monospace regular but still have bold+italic in Emacs when needed. -- You received this bug

Re: Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Jun 2011, at 13:39, Barry Warsaw 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Jun 17, 2011, at 06:44 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote: @paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the loop. My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21 but I

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 13:40, Triwanto Simanjuntak 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: The workaround works for me as well. Finally I can enjoy using the lovely Ubuntu Monospace font in my favorite  Editor. -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 11:30, Vincent Ladeuil 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Hmm it looks like I missed a detail there: it seems the switch from 'Ubuntu Beta Mono 21' to 'UbuntuBeta Mono' also means I went from 79 to 74 lines on a 24 display (aka

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 10:17, Vincent Ladeuil 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I encounter the same issue on natty. I use a slightly different way to select the font (in case it matters). I use  (setq my-default-font -unknown-UbuntuBeta Mono-normal-

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 11:33, Vincent Ladeuil 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Bah, more info: 86 lines with -adobe-courier-medium-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 79 lines with -unknown-Ubuntu Beta Mono 21-normal-normal-*-14-*-*-*- *-0-iso10646-1 74

Re: [Bug 791076] [NEW] choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 08:17, Triwanto Simanjuntak 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: I just installed the beta Ubuntu Mono space font and when i tried in Emacs by: Options-- Set Default Font --UbuntuBeta Mono, regular, the bolded

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:51, Barry Warsaw 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Also note that something about the horizontal size has drastically changed.  An 80 character wide Emacs window is now significantly narrower than it was with the '17' version.

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Jun 2011, at 23:10, Barry Warsaw 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @Paul, thanks for the explanation.  I'm sure I can adjust to the sizing changes, especially since Unity already breaks geometry hints, so I have to move windows around

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 5 Jun 2011, at 23:19, Lukas Persson 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Same problem for me, I once tried to install the font Inconsolata and I got the exactly the same problem that time around, bold italic was what I saw totally ignoring what I

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:49, Barry Warsaw 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Something must have just recently changed to cause this (yes, it's happening for me too).  On Natty, I've been using the Ubuntu Beta Mono 17 font in Emacs and Terminal for months

Re: Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 Jun 2011, at 09:48, David Marshall 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I did my own investigation of the font files using version 0.4 of the monospace. The Regular, Italic, and Bold are all 100% to-spec monospace fonts. There is a small metrics

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Jun 2011, at 07:44, Vincent Ladeuil 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the loop. My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21 but I understand why this wasn't the chosen one. I'm

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 16:39, Xavier Garrido 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Same for me -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Font Family Drivers, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Font Family.

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 08:17, Triwanto Simanjuntak 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Attachment added: emacs-UbuntuFontMonoSpace.png   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076/+attachment/2150200/+files/emacs-UbuntuFontMonoSpace.png ** Description

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:12, Dmitrijs Ledkovs 791...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: No idea if this is a bug in the font or emacs, but it sure is annoying. By default emacs doesn't use synthesized bold and italics variants for monospaced fonts. I have no

Re: Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 Jun 2011, at 12:19, Mark Shuttleworth 770...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Heh. Good catch, Daniel! I think we can approve the exception in this case. status wontfix Mark ** Changed in: ayatana-design   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix --

Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 Jun 2011, at 11:21, Launchpad Bug Tracker 770...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug by Daniel Holbach (dholbach): Binary package hint: unity I'm playing Devil's Advocate here really but the Ubuntu brandmark

Re: [Bug 768583] Re: UIFe: Onboard (on-screen keyboard) does not use Ubuntu interface font or colours

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 Jun 2011, at 22:44, marmuta 768...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Onboard main has support for themes now. There is an Ambiance theme included based on Alan Bells design. The system wide default theme can be specified in a new configuration file

Re: [Bug 746476] [NEW] The Enable the sync service for this computer label is confusing

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 May 2011, at 17:49, Launchpad Bug Tracker 746...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Robert Roth (evfool) has assigned this bug to you for ubuntuone- control-panel in Ubuntu: Binary package hint: ubuntuone-control-panel Using 0.9.4 in natty, the

Re: [Bug 746468] [NEW] no obvious link to the website

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 May 2011, at 17:48, Launchpad Bug Tracker 746...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Robert Roth (evfool) has assigned this bug to you for ubuntuone- control-panel in Ubuntu: Binary package hint: ubuntuone-control-panel Using ubuntuone-control-panel

Re: [Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Jul 2011, at 13:03, Paul Wise (Debian) 724...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Sladen pkg-fo...@paul.sladen.org wrote: My apologies for not being more explicit.  *In light of the on-going naming scheme

Re: [Bug 782355] [NEW] Invoke sudo and present password prompt when permission is denied to write to a file

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 13 May 2011, at 20:06, Mike Doherty 782...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nano If a user can read but not write a file, as often happens with system configuration files, then they need to be root or use sudo

Re: [Bug 780776] [NEW] Poor feedback on application loading

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 23:26, Simon Smith 780...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: If you launch an application, for example the media player, and it take a few seconds to load there is no feedback that the OS is doing something. In my

Re: Re: [Bug 780776] Re: Poor feedback on application loading

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 21 May 2011, at 23:29, Simon Smith 780...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I am new to ubuntu so don't know the packages well. I use the gnome desktop, but I think this may be an issue at the x window level. Maybe gtk as that is the layer above? On May

Re: [Bug 778618] Re: ubuntu 11.04 shutdown menu -- system settings should be somewhere

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736971 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 22:51, Victor Zamanian 778...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Do you mean shouldn't? shouldn't be in shutdown menu? I was just about to report a bug

Re: [Bug 778618] Re: ubuntu 11.04 shutdown menu -- system settings should be somewhere

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736971 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 May 2011, at 17:56, shinyblue 778...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Who on earth thought that was a good place for it?! Hmmm, complete this sentence: Several

Re: [Bug 778618] Re: ubuntu 11.04 shutdown menu -- system settings should be somewhere

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736971 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 May 2011, at 19:17, leighman 778...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Also affects: indicator-applet (Ubuntu)   Importance: Undecided   Status: New -- You

Re: [Bug 776427] Re: No warning when the hostname has more than 15 chars

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 16:10, Vish 776...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 ***    https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 ** This bug

Re: [Bug 776427] Re: No warning when the hostname has more than 15 chars

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 15:36, Daniel 776...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Also affects: ubiquity   Importance: Undecided   Status: New ** Project changed: ubiquity

Re: [Bug 776427] [NEW] No warning when the hostname has more than 15 chars

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 15:37, Launchpad Bug Tracker 776...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug: Binary package hint: ubiquity There

Re: [Bug 775089] [NEW] selecting resolution in monitors doesnt change resolution in log in screen etc

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 20:30, ave 775...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: Ubuntu doesnt always select the correct/desired resolution for your monitor. When you choose the correct resolution using the monitors application, it corrects the

Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 Apr 2011, at 14:01, Gerfried Fuchs 769...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Mark, I think you are referring to DFSG #4 (Integrity of The Author's Source Code), especially this sentence: The license may require derived works to carry a different name

Re: Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:51, David Marshall 769...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: We regard .ttf as a binary distribution format. Editing it to make modifications to a font (apart from the very lowest-level bit-flipping in data tables) is pretty perverse and

Re: Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 Apr 2011, at 13:15, Mark Shuttleworth 769...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: The name requirements in the UFL are the result of some protracted conversations with font designers, and they don't restrict what can be done with the work in any way, they

Re: [Bug 768583] Re: UIFe: Onboard (on-screen keyboard) does not use Ubuntu interface font or colours

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 27 Apr 2011, at 18:48, marmuta 768...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: onboard   Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug (751891).

Re: [Bug 764151] Re: Mono: дф, bad Cyrillic rendering in monospace

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 May 2011, at 12:50, Данило Шеган 764...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: FWIW, I don't see this problem with neither „д“ or „ф“ in particular, with both R17 and R21. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Font

Re: [Bug 763892] Re: Bad LibreOffice systray quick start icon

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:48, Vish 763...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Project changed: hundredpapercuts = libreoffice ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)   Importance: Undecided   Status: New ** Project changed: libreoffice = df-libreoffice --

Re: [Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 18 Apr 2011, at 16:29, Bug Watch Updater 763...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: gnome-control-center   Status: Unknown = New ** Changed in: gnome-control-center   Importance: Unknown = Low -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 18 Apr 2011, at 16:48, SB 763...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @Chris, thanks for taking the time to look at this bug. I saw the bug you reported against gnome-control-center in Bugzilla, and you suggest there to move the label below the panel.

Re: [Bug 760917] Re: ubuntu 11.04 beta2 installer crash

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 19:08, Vish 760...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a

Re: [Bug 760917] [NEW] ubuntu 11.04 beta2 installer crash

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:12, billytalent 760...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: Using Latest version of Virtual Box on an HP Envy 14. Trying to install with no power source (on battery) and no internet. ** Affects: hundredpapercuts    

Re: [Bug 760917] Re: ubuntu 11.04 beta2 installer crash

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:12, billytalent 760...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Attachment added: ubuntu_installer_crash.JPG   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760917/+attachment/2035778/+files/ubuntu_installer_crash.JPG -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 20:02, Vish 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Yup, it's uploaded now , since Paul got annoyed by people asking 'are we there yet' ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 18:02, Vish 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Chris Kenyon, Launchpad still says bug is triaged.. atleast for me here it is not showing as fix released..  ;-) You could speed up the process by finding a sponsor who will upload the

Re: [Bug 754614] Re: Upgrade vs Update confusion on Update Manager

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 734026 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734026 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:35, Vish 754...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)   Importance: Undecided   Status: New -- You

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 17:37, Chris Kenyon 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Am using Beta 2 and the bug is still present. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts.

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 4 May 2011, at 20:09, izar 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: same problem here. why does everyone blame unity when problem exists also in gnome? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 May 2011, at 04:10, Bruce Crowther 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: That's a pretty impressive workaround.  I also increased from 64 to 128Mb, and that allows me to run 7 maximised windows before I strike the problem, using the current driver.

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 09:35, Bruce Crowther 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Only had the OS installed for 24 hours and this issue is driving me bats!  Message #29 suggests I won't get ahead any better by changing drivers, so I'll just hang fire and hope

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Christophe C 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On the ubuntu french forum, the nvidia driver 173 solve the problem of some personnes, but not all of them. The white blank windows desepear for all of them, but new bugs appear

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 29 Apr 2011, at 16:34, sylvain972 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Attached: nvidia-bug-report.log. ** Attachment added: Attached: nvidia-bug-report.log.   https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/753144/+attachment/2096196/+files/nvidia-bug-report.log

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 14:19, sylvain972 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: For me, with driver 173, new bugs appear, as a nearly completely black screen (with a little normal zone at the top of the screen). My computer : Nvidia Integrated 6100, Processor

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 13:35, Bruce Crowther 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Must be old age or tiredness: re-read the posts above, changed to nvidia driver 173, no more problems.  I could rapidly start to enjoy Unity now. -- You received this

Re: Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 23:26, Josh Leverette 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: driver 173 is NOT a solution people! it is a workaround. It gives reduced performance, etc, etc, etc. nVidia needs to get into action and fix this. On Sun, May 1, 2011 at

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 2 May 2011, at 05:43, Bruce Crowther 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I take your point, Josh, but it is easier for me to leave 11.04 on my machine and use the 173 driver than it is to reinstall a previous version of the OS. If I was to do that I

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 14:42, Hubert FONGARNAND 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Problem solved by using the 173 driver version... I've just select this driver using the proprietary driver ubuntu tool! -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 2 May 2011, at 10:15, Bruno 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I have to agree with Josh. I did install 173, and Unity was working fine, so I decided to try out Gnome 3, and it was a total catastrophe, under 173. The content of the windows was not

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 23:09, Bruno 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Problem solved with the 173 driver too :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts.

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 06:56, Christophe C 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: nvidia card + compiz + nvidia official driver + Unity beta2 + AMD processor + 2Go memory. Precision : the problem occurs in natty / unity AND in natty / Unbuntu classic. No

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 25 Apr 2011, at 02:56, Josh Leverette 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Duly note.. my nvidia driver marks as activated but not in use even after completely reinstalling and multiple reboots. This could factor in? -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 17:53, Hubert FONGARNAND 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Same problem for me: My computer : Nvidia Integrated 6100, Processor AMD64, Ubuntu 11.04 32, Unity, 1 go RAM. 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C51G

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 19:10, harvey 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I only just switched to Ubuntu for the first time a few days ago. Maximized windows go blank on my old desktop (has nvidia), but natty is running perfectly on my netbook (no nvidia).

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 4 May 2011, at 08:58, Bruce Crowther 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Quote from Peter Laird, This is a tangent, but you can extract the content of your old notes via: cat ~/.gnome2/stickynotes_applet Or just browse via Nautilus and open the xml

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:39, jack 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Same problem here: nvidia card (Geforce 6200) with nvidia official driver (270.41.06) + compiz i can use the dock and unity but every window is blank white until i resize it to the

Re: [Bug 752814] Re: Impress not the default app for ODP documents

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 20 Apr 2011, at 10:40, Launchpad Bug Tracker 752...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/desktop-file-utils -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred

Re: [Bug 751891] [NEW] onboard does not follow Ubuntu branding and looks dated

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 768583 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768583 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 21 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Launchpad Bug Tracker 751...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug by Paul Sladen (sladen): Binary

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 12:10, David Henningsson 740...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Attachment added: moo.png   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/740864/+attachment/2092774/+files/moo.png -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 753075] Re: Error spam on live shutdown

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:41, Vish 753...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Thank you for bringing this bug to our attention. However, a paper cut should be a small usability issue, in the default Ubuntu install, that affects many people and is quick and easy

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 12:10, David Henningsson 740...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @mpt, I'm attaching a screenshot. There are four moo:s in the text, three are yellow and one is #e5e3e1. The yellow ones stand out much more clearly than the light gray.

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:47, Vish 740...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Yup, not an immediate concern ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)   Status: Fix Released = Triaged ** Also affects: gedit (Ubuntu)   Importance: Undecided   Status: New **

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 06:49, Vish 740...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Werent the other matches requested by the design team as per Bug #767531 ? Recommended main changes to thin out the scrollbar @James, base[ACTIVE] = shade (0.9, @selected_bg_color) is

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:12, Vish 740...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: We could try fixing this by editing : /usr/share/gtksourceview-2.0/styles/classic.xml , thats the theme gedit uses by default We have !-- Search Matching --  style name=search-match    

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 07:16, Vish 740...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Oh and gedit looks really good with : widget_class *Gedit*.GtkScrolledWindow style thin That removes an ugly border and might work better with the overlay scrollbars

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 May 2011, at 19:54, LisandroVCR 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @tolstoi: Being able to drop icons into expo view doesn't mean that you still won't be able to focus on a window and drop it where you want after some seconds. Both things are

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 18:20, LisandroVCR 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Intuitively many users will drop the file while on expo view, it is a must to be able to do it or a lot of people will end up frustrated. -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 23:05, Oxwivi 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @LisandroVCR, I know about expo view, but I don't know how to access it. And how would you expect a user to bash in a shortcut while still holding the mouse to drag an item? -- You

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Apr 2011, at 05:44, LisandroVCR 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I think that's what he meant with window previews, users should be able to drop files in window previews or unity expoed windows. In the worst case the user will end up

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 18:19, LisandroVCR 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: It makes no sense to have to drag them to the icon,  then hover to the expoed window and wait it to focus. There are too many 2 second waits. Solution: User should be able to drag

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Apr 2011, at 05:40, LisandroVCR 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: In unity when a user hovers an item over an app in the dock after a few moments all running instances of that app are shown in expo view. That's what I meant. When this

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Apr 2011, at 07:59, Alex 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I totally agree with LisandroVCR. Especially when you've got just one instance of a program running it makes no sense to wait 2 seconds. This behavior is quite confusing. -- You

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:42, Mathieu Leplatre 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: In metacity, the drag - alt-tab - drop was fixed very recently #111939 . It was a one liner ! So we can almost consider this as a regression in Unity ! ;) -- You

Re: [Bug 738636] Re: Drag and drop between different windows

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 05:37, hamlet 738...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: not being able to drag - alt-tab - drop is so frustrating -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts.

Re: Re: [Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 25 Apr 2011, at 19:26, Jelmer Vernooij 735...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:02 +, Johan Fornander wrote: The source code in the official samba git (source/lib/util.c) seems to use HOST_NAME_MAX and I found an inconsistency

Re: [Bug 735008] Re: Missplaced Ubuntu dash logo line, with a light panel

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 23:56, Manuel Nicetto 735...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Branch linked: lp:~manuel-nicetto/unity/bug-735008 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper

Re: [Bug 735008] Re: Missplaced Ubuntu dash logo line, with a light panel

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 23:08, Manuel Nicetto 735...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: unity   Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: unity Assignee: (unassigned) = Manuel Nicetto (manuel-nicetto) -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 732854] Re: Wishlist: Use Ubuntu font for pre-installer gfxboot menus

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 05:17, Launchpad Bug Tracker 732...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: [Expired for gfxboot-theme-ubuntu (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: gfxboot-theme-ubuntu (Ubuntu)   Status: Incomplete =

Re: [Bug 727069] Re: Refers to Administration menu that doesn't exist in Unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:33, Vish 727...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercutters, which is subscribed to One

Re: Re: [Bug 709980] Re: SRU ubuntu-font-family 0.70.1 for *

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 20 Apr 2011, at 18:41, Mark Shuttleworth 709...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Thanks  Pedro! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Font Family Drivers, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Font Family.

Re: [Bug 691482] Re: Brasero Disc Burner wrongly named

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 7 May 2011, at 19:34, Glennz nl 691...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @Chris I don't agree with you. Should we then also rename Firefox to Webbrowser, Banshee to Music player and Libreoffice Writer to Word processor? I think getting rid of the CD/DVD

  1   2   3   4   >