Re: [Bug 252418] Re: gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy

2009-08-23 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: Please, reply to Luca's question. Sorry, I forgot about this bug. I'll have to retake a look, but that won't happen before Tuesday (have some other stuff to do). -- gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy

[Bug 413164] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1

2009-08-13 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, Upstream released new release 0.15 which is officially compatible with Firefox 3.5. The packaging is also updated. Here are the changelog entries: * Add .bzr-builddeb/default.conf * Use med-xpi-pack from mozilla-devscripts package - remove

[Bug 411740] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu2

2009-08-13 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Summary changed: - REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1 + REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu2 ** Description changed: Hello, I've prepared an update for nspluginwrapper, which includes new upstream release

[Bug 413164] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1

2009-08-13 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Branch linked: lp:~jazzva/firefox-extensions/mozilla- livehttpheaders-0.15 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 411740] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1

2009-08-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, I've prepared an update for nspluginwrapper, which includes new upstream release 1.3.0. This is a development version, but it is already in Debian unstable repository. I have tested it a bit, and it behaves nicely. I will also push it to my PPA [1], so a reviewer can

[Bug 411740] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1

2009-08-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Branch linked: lp:~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/1.3.0 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 306836]

2009-08-04 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Andrea, On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Andrea Veri wrote: you should also update maintainer field with this mail: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com not the old one as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField Thanks, I didn't know about new

[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2009-08-04 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Andrea, I just noticed that I have forgot to change target from UNRELEASED to karmic in debian/changelog. I pushed a new revision with just that change. Should I bump version to -0ubuntu2 instead? Or will it be OK with UNRELEASED (e.g. archive administrators will fix that)? Sorry for

Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2009-08-03 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Andrea, On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andrea Veri wrote: ok, just let me know when you have a working package ready and I'll take a look at it. It's ready, you can get it from the linked branch and run bzr builddeb. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for

[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2009-08-03 Thread Saša Bodiroža
to addons.mozilla.org. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification

[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2009-08-02 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Andrea, Sorry for the delay (been pretty busy in the past few months). The new version (1.6) is detected in Thunderbird 2.0.0.22, but it's not really showing up in bug mails. Could you (or someone other) test (building with bzr builddeb) the current revision in the linked branch before

Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2009-08-02 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Saša Bodiroža wrote: The new version (1.6) is detected in Thunderbird 2.0.0.22, but it's not really showing up in bug mails. I have found the bug, and will e-mail upstream developer. With version 1.5, I can see the box with bug data, but it's collapsed (so, that's still not usable

Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2009-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Andrea, Just give me a day or two to update the branch. I have checked now, and version 1.5, which is available on addons.mozilla.org, contains a license file. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received

Re: [Bug 379847] Re: [needs-packaging] long-url-please

2009-05-23 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Nathan, Changelog version is still 0.1-0ubuntu1, I suppose it should be 0.4.1-0ubuntu1. Also, please fix mozilla to Mozilla in description field. After those minor changes are pushed, feel free to upload the package. Thanks for packaging it. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs

Re: [Bug 355725] Re: firefox-greasemonkey should be upgraded to 0.8.20090123.1

2009-05-13 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Looks good to me. Alexander said that we should remove firefox- prefix, so you're free to do that in binary package name and provide a dummy package. -- firefox-greasemonkey should be upgraded to 0.8.20090123.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355725 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 345606] Re: list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration

2009-04-02 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Description changed: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper The current implementation doesn't take in consideration wrappers which are installed in directory specified with NSPLUGIN_DIR environment variable. This is needed in order to be able to update all wrappers in

[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set

2009-03-19 Thread Saša Bodiroža
I have pushed a new revision that contains the fix for this bug. It will not install wrappers to default dirs if NSPLUGIN_DIR environment variable is specified. Alexander, I'll open a new bug for implementation of list_plugins which take those nspluginwrapper's meta-files in consideration. **

[Bug 345606] [NEW] list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration

2009-03-19 Thread Saša Bodiroža
: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = Confirmed -- list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345606 You received this bug

[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set

2009-03-19 Thread Saša Bodiroža
I pushed it to the branch linked to this bug report [1]. If I understood correctly, beta freeze applies only to the packages in main and restricted. nspluginwrapper is in multiverse. [1] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu.1.2.2-0ubuntu2 -- nspluginwrapper creates

[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set

2009-03-07 Thread Saša Bodiroža
I attached the branch that contains partial fix for this bug. I removed the Iceweasel dir from debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff and it doesn't create links /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins anymore. ** Also affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set

2009-03-07 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Also, it seems this bug is located in flashplugin-nonfree's prerm script. nspluginwrapper is called in its postinst script and the wrapper is installed. The call to nspluginwrapper to uninstall the wrapper is missing in flashplugin-nonfree's prerm script. I added the f-n task to the bug report.

[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set

2009-03-07 Thread Saša Bodiroža
There is a part in debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff which is used to install these default symlinks. We can remove it and just use NSPLUGIN_DIR env var, or keep it and add nspluginwrapper -r call in flashplugin-nonfree's prerm script. Alexander, if I understood correctly, we don't need

[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set

2009-03-05 Thread Saša Bodiroža
I'll fix it later tonight, or tomorrow if that's not too late. Sorry for the delay, I was supposed to fix it in the first place. ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu Jaunty) Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though

Re: [Bug 205218] Re: [unmet dependencies] glife requires libglade-gnome0, but that doesn't exists

2009-02-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
change version in debian/changelog from 0.2.1-1build2 to 0.2.1-1ubuntu1, and targeted release from intrepid to jaunty. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [unmet dependencies] glife requires libglade-gnome0, but that doesn't exists https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205218 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 316305] Re: please sync deluge/1.1.2.dfsg-1 from debian-experimental

2009-02-02 Thread Saša Bodiroža
this answer clarifies the situation a bit. Here are some possibly useful links: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/ReleaseProcess https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#SyncingAndMerging -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- please sync deluge/1.1.2.dfsg-1 from debian

Re: [Bug 316305] please sync only from debian

2009-02-02 Thread Saša Bodiroža
://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/d/deluge/deluge_1.0.7.dfsg-3/changelog -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- Please upgrade deluge to version 1.1.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 323409] Re: sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install

2009-01-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Same here... Jaunty 32bit -- sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 323409] Re: sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install

2009-01-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Same here... Jaunty 32bit -- sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 316305] Re: please sync to deluge 1.1.0

2009-01-15 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Take a look at bug #275375 [1]. I can see from the changelog that this package isn't based on the one from Debian. We are trying to not diverge a lot, if that isn't needed. Maybe it would be good if the version from Debian gets synced first, and then upgraded to 1.1.0 in Ubuntu. I'm not sure if

Re: [Bug 311817] Re: External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525

2008-12-28 Thread Saša Bodiroža
patches. For the first patch it worked, but it also started fading out the sound when headphones are plugged in (as we discussed on IRC). -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311817 You received this bug

[Bug 311817] [NEW] External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525

2008-12-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, I'm currently running Jaunty on Dell Inspiron 1525 and the external microphone jack is not working. I also used Intrepid on this laptop, and it didn't work there too. Here is the output of alsa-info.sh: http://www.alsa-

Re: [Bug 309335] Re: .bzr-builddeb/default.conf doesnt export-upstream in some cases

2008-12-18 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello James, Here is the output for both cases. s...@cakana:~/Devel/bugmail/bugmail.ubuntu$ bzr bd Building using working tree Preparing the build area: ../build-area Looking for ../bugmail-extension_1.3.orig.tar.gz to use as upstream source For compatibility looking for

[Bug 306229] Re: [Jaunty] Please remove all iceweasel packages

2008-12-16 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, Scrapbook is provided by scrapbook package. iceweasel-scrapbook is a transitional package that depends on it. It was merged from Debian, which uses iceweasel-scrapbook as the package name. -- [Jaunty] Please remove all iceweasel packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306229 You

Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2008-12-15 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Alexander Sack wrote: Was the licensing ok? - Alexander Yep, GPL. It was confirmed by mail. I'll ask him to provide a license fail for the next upload, if that's ok. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You

[Bug 306836] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2008-12-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, Please review and sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird. This extension adds bug status to the header pane. It currently supports Bugzilla, Trac, Flyspray and Launchpad. It is licensed under GPL v3. ** Affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided

[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2008-12-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Also affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = In Progress -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension

[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

2008-12-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Changed in: firefox-extensions Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: firefox-extensions Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor

Re: [Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

2008-12-09 Thread Saša Bodiroža
added: screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20320651/screenshot.png I think that should be set in the extension itself, so the upstream should be contacted about this. It's not done in the packaging. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs-packaging] Chatzilla https

Re: [Bug 227945] Re: [needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox

2008-12-09 Thread Saša Bodiroža
will be able to include some of our work in Debian, making the merging process a lot easier, at least with Debian using mozilla-devscripts for extensions. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227945 You

[Bug 303974] Re: [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8

2008-12-09 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Description changed: - SVN trunk represents nspluginwrapper 1.1.8 with the following changes: + The current revision 52 in the linked branch contains code from SVN + revision 805, which is tagged as 1.1.10 in revision 806. - * Delay NPN_ReleaseObject() if there is incoming RPC - * Improve

[Bug 303974] Re: [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8

2008-12-03 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 184882] Re: Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability

2008-12-03 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, Is this bug still valid? According to Stumbleupon extension, it should be compatible with Firefox 1.0 up to 3.0.*. ** Changed in: mozilla-stumbleupon (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Incomplete -- Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability

[Bug 303974] [NEW] [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8

2008-12-01 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Walsh) * Make `which` failures silent for soundwrappers (Stanislav Brabec) Please update the package in jaunty ** Affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee

Re: [Bug 303628] [NEW] Please update gnome-voice-control package to version 0.3+SVN

2008-11-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
As far as I know, it is not possible to update to 0.3, until pocketsphinx and sphinxbase get to the repositories. David Huggins-Daines prepared the packages few months ago, and I tried to help him to get advocates for it, but we had no luck in getting them in. I contacted people on #cmusphinx on

Re: [Bug 297169] Re: mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox

2008-11-26 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: And yes I also have a branch which I use to store my packaging. If you use a branch to maintain your packaging, you should mention it in debian/control, like in the template [1]. If you're not familiar with the branch naming, take a look

[Bug 184882] Re: Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability

2008-11-26 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Changed in: mozilla-stumbleupon (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = In Progress -- Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184882 You received this bug notification because you

Re: [Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
The process should be the same as for the other uploads. Subscribe u-u-s and someone should upload it. I think the process doesn't require a debdiff, as it's maintained in a bzr branch and afaik MOTU should handle that too. It has an ack from Mozilla Extensions team. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please

[Bug 297169] Re: mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox

2008-11-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, As of intrepid, there is package abrowser, which provides unbranded Firefox. Please add an optional dependency for it. It should be like abrowser (= 3) | firefox (= 3). Thank you for your contribution. -- mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-18 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Looks good to me. Could you just add (LP: #297708) to the new upstream item in the changelog? I think it's ready for the archive after that. Thanks. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-13 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, Following the link in copyright file, I see that the source is obtained as xpi file. You could use med-xpi-unpack and med-xpi-pack scripts provided by mozilla-devscripts package. It would require a slight change to debian/rules. First you prepare the source tree using med-xpi-unpack, by

Re: [Bug 153777] Re: Firefox becomes inactive While Watching Videos

2008-11-01 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Daniel T Chen wrote: Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10? I can't reproduce it anymore... Using flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.12.36ubuntu1. -- Firefox becomes inactive While Watching Videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153777 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 290014] Re: clamdrib needs-packaging

2008-10-29 Thread Saša Bodiroža
extensions, and later SeaMonkey, Songbird, ... extensions. We can continue this on #ubuntu-mozillateam if there's a need, since it's a bit off topic on this bug report :). -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- clamdrib needs-packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290014 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-10-28 Thread Saša Bodiroža
of the members of the Launchpad development said that it is not possible. Sorry for the mess, but I'm not sure if I can do anything else right now. [1] https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/37825 -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs-packaging] Jabbin https

[Bug 290014] Re: clamdrib needs-packaging

2008-10-28 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Sure thing. I'll add the extension to the list and contact upstream. I'm not sure if we need a special table for Thunderbird, since some of the extensions work both with FF and TB. Maybe we could add icons next to the name, which should represent the programs they are compatible with. I think

[Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-10-28 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, I have asked on #launchpad IRC channel and I got the answer that it would be the best if you contact them (via mail, answer tracker on Launchpad I guess). I have tried to help you as much as I can. I'm sorry that this problem occurred in the first place. -- [needs-packaging] Jabbin

[Bug 285321] Re: [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable

2008-10-22 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Siegfried-Angel wrote: But that debdiff wasn't uploaded, so as the version currently in Intrepid only depends on Iceweasel it doesn't make sense to list Removed Firefox 2 dependency from the changelog. Right, sorry. I skipped that detail. Everything is ok with

Re: [Bug 285321] Re: [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable

2008-10-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: Sasa, is that ok now? Looks good to me, except that Firefox 2 removal isn't mentioned in the changelog. fabrice_sp, could you add that to your changelog entry? Thanks again. -- [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (=

[Bug 287253] [NEW] diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox

2008-10-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Current version in intrepid depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox package. The attached debdiff fixes this bug. ** Affects: diggler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox

[Bug 287253] Re: diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox

2008-10-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Attachment added: diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18783069/diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff ** Changed in: diggler (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Attachment removed: diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff

[Bug 287253] Re: diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox

2008-10-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Attachment added: diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18783113/diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff -- diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287253 You received this bug notification because you are a

Re: [Bug 286225] Re: [intrepid] iceweasel-vimperator: Depends: iceweasel (= 3.0~) but it is not instalable

2008-10-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello fabrice_sp, There is abrowser package, which is unbranded Firefox 3. Please add optional dependency to it, along other suggested changes. Thank you. -- [intrepid] iceweasel-vimperator: Depends: iceweasel (= 3.0~) but it is not instalable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286225 You

Re: [Bug 285321] Re: [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable

2008-10-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello fabrice_sp, Firefox 2 has been removed from the archive some time ago. Please remove the link to its directory, /usr/firefox/extensions/. Also, there is abrowser package, which is unbranded Firefox 3. Please add optional dependency to it. Thank you. -- [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext:

[Bug 285281] Re: Gnome Voice Contol cannot be displayed

2008-10-18 Thread Saša Bodiroža
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252418 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 252418 gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy -- Gnome Voice Contol cannot be displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285281 You

Re: [Bug 273849] [NEW] Capture Page Ctrl+shift+L conflits with LiveHTTPHeaders

2008-09-24 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello arky, This is something that should be reported upstream. I'll make sure they hear of this, and find a solution. Thank you for reporting a bug. -- Capture Page Ctrl+shift+L conflits with LiveHTTPHeaders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273849 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2008-09-22 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Also affects: bookmarksftp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2008-09-22 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Changed in: bookmarksftp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu)

[Bug 272959] [NEW] Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2008-09-21 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, Some of the packages (mostly Mozilla extensions and plugins) depend on both firefox and firefox-2, or just on firefox-2. Regarding planned Firefox 2 removal from the archives, we should change the dependencies by removing optional firefox-2 dependency, or

Re: [Bug 257307] Re: On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package

2008-09-06 Thread Saša Bodiroža
, would be a good thing. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 250769] Re: Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content

2008-09-01 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Also affects: firefox via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548993 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250769 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 250769] Re: Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content

2008-08-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, Are you using nspluginwrapper? It seems to me that this was happening with nspluginwrapper 1.0.0. Version 1.1.0 should fix this bug, and it's available in Intrepid. If you are using nspluginwrapper, please upgrade it, and report if it works. Thank you. -- Firefox opens new popup window

Re: [Bug 254649] Re: Please merge scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable (main)

2008-08-26 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, I would like if you could improve this a bit more: * additional dependency should be firefox-3.0, as firefox-3 package doesn't exist. Please update that in the changelog entry, too. * it seems that you missed to include few more remaining changes, specifically Change iceweasel-scrapbook

[Bug 257307] [NEW] On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package

2008-08-12 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, I have just tried installing both netbeans and netbeans-ide. I received this error: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/netbeans-ide_6.0.1+dfsg-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/applications/netbeans.desktop', which is also in

[Bug 254649] Re: Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable

2008-08-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, I think there are more changes from previous versions that need to be mentioned. There are a lot of changes to debian/control from version 1.3.2.5-2ubuntu1, which aren't mentioned in remaining changes. Please add them. Thanks for your work. -- Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe)

[Bug 254649] Re: Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable

2008-08-10 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Sorry, I mentioned changes only to debian/control file, but there are also some more. For example, this one: * Remove the iceweasel-scrapbook. prefix from file names. -- Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254649 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-08 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Sveinung, I have look into this debdiff and it looks good. The needed changes are mostly correction of typos and maybe rewording in changelog entry in order to make it more clear: 1.) I would change debian/iceweasel-torbutton.* are still debian/firefox-torbutton.*. In previous upload, we

[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-08 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Looks good. Ack from Mozilla Extensions team. Please resubscribe ubuntu- universe-sponsors, unassign yourself and set the status to Confirmed. Thanks for the merge :). About the change for iceweasel-torbutton.* and torbutton-extension.*... Moving of iceweasel-torbutton.* to torbutton-extension.*

[Bug 219303] Re: Problem with OAFIID:GNOME_VoiceControlApplet while adding VoiceControl to GNOME Panel

2008-08-01 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, I have uploaded gnome-voice-control for Gutsy and Hardy that solve these issues to my PPA [1], until they are published as stable release updates (see bug 252424 for Gutsy [2] and bug 252418 for Hardy [3]). The versions are OK, so once SRU's are published to primary Ubuntu archives, the

[Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration

2008-07-31 Thread Saša Bodiroža
This is a bug, known upstream, so I'm making this a bug report again in order to track status of the upstream bug. ** Summary changed: - Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration + Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration on amd64 ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 243902] Re: mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run)

2008-07-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Moved to Intrepid last night, and I'm experiencing this bug. It seems to me that the problem occurs because in /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs on line 120 it tries to grep /etc/network/run/ifstate, which doesn't exist. Changing that to /var/run/network/ifstate solved this for me. Although, I'm not

[Bug 243902] Re: mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run)

2008-07-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Ah, sorry. I haven't noticed the same is reported in attachment in comment #3. -- mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration

2008-07-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Ben, As far as I can see, the problem might be that your sound card is recording only left channel, when it's recording in mono. Try right clicking on Volume control, then open the controls. Click on Settings. I have a Mix mono switch to select. That maybe enables mixing of both left and

Re: [Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration

2008-07-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Ben, Look under the recording tab for the muted channel. Also, check out the options inside File menu. I switched to 8.10 alpha 3 last night, and the volume control is a bit different. I suppose there should be options or settings under the File menu. Try changing the devices and see if any

[Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration

2008-07-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
I think this is not a bug. Some setting should be changed in volume control to fix this. After the problem is solved, we can open another bug report for this, in case it's really a bug. ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** bug changed to question:

[Bug 252793] Re: xulrunner ships some images as executables

2008-07-30 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Paolo, Thank you for your patch. It is applied to the development branch, so marking as Fix committed. The bug will auto-close once it gets published. ** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- xulrunner ships some

[Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration

2008-07-29 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello Ben, Thank you for your report. I have heard about this problem, and I'll see with upstream developers if it is fixed, and if it's a bug in gnome- voice-control, or something else. As a workaround, I might suggest this from comment #10 from bug 219303: I finally managed to fix this other

[Bug 252793] Re: xulrunner ships some images as executables

2008-07-29 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Summary changed: - xulrunner should not be executable + xulrunner ships some images as executables -- xulrunner ships some images as executables https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 252418] Re: gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy

2008-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Attachment added: gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352671/gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-voice-control Hello, gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, because it removes gnome- - doc-utils.make on make

[Bug 252418] [NEW] gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy

2008-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-voice-control Hello, gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, because it removes gnome- doc-utils.make on make distclean. It also fails to start because it installs in /usr/libexec, instead of /usr/lib/gnome-voice-control. This bug has been

[Bug 252424] Re: gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running

2008-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Attachment added: gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352820/gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252424 You received

[Bug 252418] Re: gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy

2008-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Attachment removed: gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352671/gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff ** Attachment added: gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352818/gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed --

[Bug 252424] Re: gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running

2008-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
** Attachment added: gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352800/gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff ** Attachment removed: gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352800/gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff -- gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running

[Bug 252424] [NEW] gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running

2008-07-27 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-voice-control Hello, gnome-voice-control build depends on automake-1.9, which doesn't exist in gutsy. gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe (after removed automake-1.9 build-dependency and automake call in debian/rules), because it removes

[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-07-26 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello David, We're not shipping Iceweasel, so you can safely remove iceweasel dependency. We're also trying not to mention Iceweasel and Icedove in Description fields, in order not to confuse users. Changing Iceweasel to Firefox and Icedove to Thunderbird would be nice. You don't need to

[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-07-26 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello David, Few more corrections are needed. src/install.rdf mentions that torbutton is compatible with Firefox 2 - 3.0a1pre. Please try to bump maxVersion for Firefox to 3.* in install.rdf and test if it works well in Firefox 3. If it doesn't we need to remove firefox package from Depends, as

[Bug 251156] [NEW] Please update firefox-sage to 1.4.2

2008-07-23 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Public bug reported: Hello, I have prepared an update for firefox-sage package. It is located in my bzr branch, which is linked to this report. It brings the new update for Sage, which is compatible with Firefox 3. On the other hand, it's not compatible with Firefox 2, so the packaging had to be

[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3

2008-07-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Here is the .diff.gz for the new upstream version. .tar.gz can be obtained with watch file. ** Attachment added: gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16203969/gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: gnome-mplayer (Ubuntu) Assignee: Saša Bodiroža

[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3

2008-07-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
I have just noticed that packaging date for Debian is in debian/copyright, instead of the old one. I'll upload the new .diff.gz soon. -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3

2008-07-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
This one should be good. ** Attachment added: gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16204401/gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3

2008-07-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
New diff.gz, with applied patch. ** Attachment added: gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16205065/gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 246276] Re: Please update gecko-mediaplayer to 0.6.3

2008-07-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- Please update gecko-mediaplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

  1   2   3   4   5   >