[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
I forgot the attribution to geser from IRC, since he recommended the proper fix! ** Attachment removed: packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25819233/packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2.debdiff ** Attachment added: packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2.debdiff

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Note: Build logs can be seen at: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit- gnome/0.3.13-0ubuntu1 -- FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Try this: sudo pbuilder --create --distribution jaunty --components main restricted universe multiverse --mirror http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu; -- pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364808 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Igor, did you see the command I said above? try this one, it does what you need (create a jaunty pbuilder for http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu): sudo pbuilder --create --distribution jaunty --components main restricted universe multiverse --mirror http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu; --

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
You probably kept your /etc/ (?) This is a clean install (formatted root / partition, except my /home partition) of the most current daily ubuntu iso (yesterday's): $ cat /etc/pbuilderrc # this is your configuration file for pbuilder. # the file in /usr/share/pbuilder/pbuilderrc is the default

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
And I think that in order to properly use --othermirror I think you need --override-config *before* each call: sudo pbuilder create --override-config --distribution jaunty --othermirror deb http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jaunty main restricted multiverse universe -- pbuilder: Invalid

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Savvas Radevic (medigeek) -- FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Savvas Radevic (medigeek) -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
This patch is for this bug and bug #349572 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome $ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 0 500

[Bug 293176] Re: Ubuntu 8.10 doesn't support logitech and labtec webcam

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Not working here either, gspca/tv8532 for device 046d:0920 - I get Input/output error :( $ apt-cache policy libv4l-0 gstreamer-tools libv4l-0: Installed: 0.5.8-1 Candidate: 0.5.8-1 Version table: *** 0.5.8-1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100

[Bug 293176] Re: Ubuntu doesn't support some logitech and labtec webcams

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
OK, I have managed to make it work, but the input is *ugly* (greenish)! Original guide: http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/6630.html 1. Run this command in terminal: v4l-info | grep 'device info\|version' You will see: ioctl VIDIOCGTUNER: Invalid argument ioctl VIDIOCGFBUF: Invalid argument ###

[Bug 293176] Re: Ubuntu doesn't support some logitech and labtec webcams

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
P.S. Run this command to check if it was installed correctly: v4l-info | grep 'device info\|version' ioctl VIDIOCGTUNER: Invalid argument ioctl VIDIOCGFBUF: Invalid argument ### v4l2 device info [/dev/video0] ### version : 2.5.0 ### video4linux device info [/dev/video0]

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Also affects: gnome-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
as andreasn replied packagekit specific icons should be installed by packagekit So this is a packagekit-specific bug that should be forwarded upstream :) ** Changed in: gnome-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #21298 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21298 ** Also affects: packagekit via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21298 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
It's a package mistake the icons have make rules to be linked, but the package doesn't seem to include them: install-data-hook: mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(DATADIR)/icons/hicolor/$(size)/apps; mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(DATADIR)/icons/hicolor/$(size)/mimetypes; ln -fs

[Bug 105411] Re: [needs-packaging] ocropus

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Kevin - this sounds wonderful. Any estimate for when it'll be available in Jaunty? In the next synchronisation :) probably will land in karmic, but let's hope the new ocropus will be in Debian soon! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518772

[Bug 364443] [NEW] FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome $ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: failed_buid_logs.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25809468/failed_buid_logs.tar.gz -- FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
blocked by bug #364443 -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
After Laney's request on IRC, I made the really-minimal-patch to just make gapti work for now. :) ** Attachment added: the really-minimal-patch version http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25745490/gapti_0.0.2ubuntu5.debdiff -- Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

[Bug 363794] [NEW] gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist-upgrade

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: /usr/bin/gpk-update-viewer gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist- upgrade Steps to reproduce: 1. Execute: sudo aptitude update 2. Now go to System Administration Update System

[Bug 363794] Re: gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist-upgrade

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
$ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- gpk-update-viewer shows updates available

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
from packagekit-gnome package in ubuntu: gpk-prefs,desktop missing icon gpk-prefs gpk-repo.desktop missing icon gpk-repo I think it's upstream, since the rest of the icons seem in place :) It could also be gnome-icon-theme (?) $ grep Icon /usr/share/applications/gpk*

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sorry, missing icons: gpk-service-pack, gpk-log, gpk-repo, gpk-prefs -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
Is that fixed with sqlite3 3.6.12-1? You can try it from my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa -- FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 363192] Re: sqlite3 packaged in Jaunty cannot open databases which use indexed keyword, and is therefore incompatible with Axiom

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
Should we forward the sync request in a separate bug ( bug #356935 ) or should I close that one? -- sqlite3 packaged in Jaunty cannot open databases which use indexed keyword, and is therefore incompatible with Axiom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363192 You received this bug notification

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sqlite3 + + UPDATE: + It seems that syncing this package would provide a fix for these bugs: + * bug #353064 + * bug #363192 Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing (also in unstable). There are features as well as improvements in

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sqlite3 UPDATE: It seems that syncing this package would provide a fix for these bugs: * bug #353064 * bug #363192 + KNOWN DOWNSIDES: + * Segfault when table contains default value:

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-17 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ack'ed by ScottK on IRC, #ubuntu-motu: 2009-04-17 05:54:00 (CEST) ScottK savvas: motu-release ack to fix gapti. -- Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 283782] Re: firefox - cannot save blogger.com and yahoo.com login information

2009-04-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ok, so it works for blogger.com, it seems it's website-related, since google made the extra step to fix it :) I'll set this as Invalid. If anyone wants this fixed for yahoo, drop them an email or suggestion at their help/contact/support site. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 136435] Re: smc - Secret Maryo Chronicles - unmet dependency in Gutsy

2009-04-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #454679 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454679 -- smc - Secret Maryo Chronicles - unmet dependency in Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 344189] Re: [karmic] Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8

2009-04-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
This should either be set for karmic, or wait for the new upstream release to arrive and use the corrected translation file :) ** Summary changed: - Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8 + [karmic] Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8 -- [karmic] Bad encoding for

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
When you run the current version of gapti in ubuntu jaunty: $ apt-cache policy gapti gapti: Installed: 0.0.2ubuntu4 Candidate: 0.0.2ubuntu4 Version table: *** 0.0.2ubuntu4 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ gapti Traceback

[Bug 323222] Re: Provider in Oman - Nawras

2009-04-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
Should be fixed in jaunty as far as I can see: $ apt-cache policy mobile-broadband-provider-info mobile-broadband-provider-info: Installed: 20090309-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 20090309-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 20090309-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages

Re: [Bug 232469] Re: wget does not use network proxy in some cases

2009-04-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
But I think that variables in /etc/environment take effect only after you logout and log back in, not instantly isn't that right? Whereas variables in /etc/profile.d/ are taken instantly with a reset command or by opening up a new terminal window. -- wget does not use network proxy in some cases

Re: [Bug 232469] Re: wget does not use network proxy in some cases

2009-04-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
Scratch that last comment, I think I'm wrong :) -- wget does not use network proxy in some cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 361301] Re: invalid syntax 3.0.1-0ubuntu12 except IOError, msg:

2009-04-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
I can confirm this bug: Setting up python3.0 (3.0.1-0ubuntu12) ... File /usr/lib/python3.0/distutils/command/bdist_wininst.py, line 345 except IOError, msg: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax $ apt-cache policy python3.0 python3.0: Installed: 3.0.1-0ubuntu12 Candidate:

[Bug 361301] Re: invalid syntax 3.0.1-0ubuntu12 except IOError, msg:

2009-04-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
++except IOError, msg: ++raise DistutilsFileError, str(msg) + ', please install the python%s-dev package' % sys.version[:3] I think it needs an as in patch debian/patches/bdist-wininst-notfound.dpatch: http://docs.python.org/3.0/reference/compound_stmts.html#except except

[Bug 237674] Re: Please merge python-zsi (2.1~a1-2) (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-04-11 Thread Savvas Radevic
I forgot to subsribe the sponsors for this, I guess it's too late for this inclusion? -- Please merge python-zsi (2.1~a1-2) (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 358271] [NEW] Unsupported settings in configuration file /etc/default/console-setup

2009-04-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: console-setup $ apt-cache policy console-setup console-setup: Installed: 1.28ubuntu8 Candidate: 1.28ubuntu8 Version table: *** 1.28ubuntu8 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status It showed an

[Bug 358271] Re: Unsupported settings in configuration file /etc/default/console-setup

2009-04-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: Current /etc/default/console-setup http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25098442/console-setup -- Unsupported settings in configuration file /etc/default/console-setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 136435] Re: smc - Secret Maryo Chronicles - unmet dependency in Gutsy

2009-04-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
Setting as fix released by the last comments. If it's not fixed, then please set it as Invalid, there's no time for this to be fixed, end-of-life is on April 18th: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases ** Changed in: smc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- smc - Secret Maryo

[Bug 358271] Re: Unsupported settings in configuration file /etc/default/console-setup

2009-04-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
I didn't put it in myself, this was a clean install of jaunty alpha 5. I think it was done like this: - System Preferences Keyboard Layouts - Clicked Layout options . - Keys to change layout Alt+Shift and Both Alt keys together are the only ones checked - Clicked Close and Apply System-wide

Re: [Bug 358271] Re: Unsupported settings in configuration file /etc/default/console-setup

2009-04-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hehe - well, in that case, I did put it in using that apply system-wide! It's nothing that should worry the users in the future right? -- Unsupported settings in configuration file /etc/default/console-setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358271 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 290062] Re: installer seems to ignore proxy-settings

2009-04-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 232469 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232469 Please forward your idea here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499891 However, a similar fix is already mentioned: http_proxy=http://my.proxy.intranet:8080/ apt-get install

[Bug 300997] Re: monthcalendar on ubuntu wikis - unattractive brown/red colours

2009-04-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Will forward to r...@ubuntu.com ** Changed in: ubuntu-website Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- monthcalendar on ubuntu wikis - unattractive brown/red colours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
I just realised that we're in beta and... perhaps this is not such a good idea. Setting as invalid ** Changed in: sqlite3 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356935 You received this bug notification

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: pbuilder_lintian_debc.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24929222/pbuilder_lintian_debc.log -- FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: rdepends.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24929227/rdepends.txt ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sqlite3 Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing (also in unstable). There are features as well as improvements in processing speed. One of the

[Bug 356935] [NEW] FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sqlite3 Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing (also in unstable). There are features as well as improvements in processing speed. One of the features I would love and expect to see in jaunty is a) the hot-backup interface [1][2] -

[Bug 347327] Re: crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders

2009-04-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Summary changed: - kpackagekit crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders + crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders ** Description changed: + UPDATE: + Affects both kpackagekit and packagekit-gnome + Kpackagekit crashes when installing packages from folders

Re: [Bug 326353] Re: [needs-packaging] padre-perl

2009-04-05 Thread Savvas Radevic
Can it be pulled over to Ubuntu (maybe even to make it into the 2009.04 release ?) http://packages.debian.org/sid/main/padre Too late for new packages unfortunately, but try and talk with the ubuntu-motu people in IRC: irc://irc.ubuntu.com/#ubuntu-motu Maybe someone would approve it. :) --

[Bug 354251] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-05 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 According to the DpkgTerminalLog.gz log file, it is: Setting up python3.0-minimal (3.0.1-0ubuntu10) ... Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python3.0... pycentral: pycentral rtinstall: installed

[Bug 337696] Re: package python-wxgtk2.6 2.6.3.2.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/wxPython/__init__.py', which is also in package python-wxgt

2009-04-05 Thread Savvas Radevic
Fixed an hour ago: bug #355455 It should be in the repositories soon, version 2.8.9.1-0ubuntu6 -- package python-wxgtk2.6 2.6.3.2.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/wxPython/__init__.py', which is also in package python-wxgtk2.8

[Bug 355678] [NEW] svgz not associated with inkscape (open with list)

2009-04-05 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: inkscape Inkscape should be associated with svgz, i.e. when I install the inkscape package and double click on a .svgz file, it should open with inkscape and not with image viewer. $ apt-cache policy inkscape inkscape: Installed: 0.46-5ubuntu1

Re: [Bug 355678] [NEW] svgz not associated with inkscape (open with list)

2009-04-05 Thread Savvas Radevic
As a note, it's not even included in the open with list. -- svgz not associated with inkscape (open with list) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-04-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
Looks like it's either softwareproperties/kde/SoftwarePropertiesKDE.py or softwareproperties/SoftwareProperties.py ** Package changed: python2.6 (Ubuntu) = software-properties (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- python2.6 crashed with

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-04-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sorry, softwareproperties/AptAuth.py or softwareproperties/kde/SoftwarePropertiesKDE.py -- python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-04-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
Similar in software-properties-gtk, but the GUI application doesn't crash in this case ** Attachment added: software-sources-gtk_authentication.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24806360/software-sources-gtk_authentication.png -- python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

[Bug 354251] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354228 package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: -- package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 354326] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 354251 package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has

[Bug 354240] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 354251 package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has

[Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Same in python3.0: $ sudo aptitude -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done The following partially installed packages will be configured: python3.0

Re: [Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Can I request an FFe to upload 0.0.3 ? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24733041/gapti-dsc_and_tar-gz.tar.gz -- needs python 2.6 transition and porting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 354251] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of the bug #354228 -- package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Re: [Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
It's mostly the smaller patch mentioned above, directly changed to source, with proper copyright and license, debhelper 7 and of course compatibility with python2.6 (and probably later versions). Here is the changelog with changes introduced in 0.0.3: revno: 34 message: debian/rules:

[Bug 354360] Re: python2.6-minimal update error

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354228 package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: -- python2.6-minimal update error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354360 You

[Bug 354328] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 (not sure though) If you still face problems, remove the duplicate entry: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.6/+bug/354328/+duplicate ** This bug

[Bug 354371] Re: [Jaunty] Python3.0 dependency problem

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354228 package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: -- [Jaunty] Python3.0 dependency problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354371

[Bug 350443] Re: package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
I don't know if it's related, but VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz shows this: Errors were encountered while processing: python-scipy Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py, line 753, in emit self.flush() File /usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py,

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ok, I misunderstood the feature-freeze exception. It seems that since this is a bug-fix release only (improvements in packaging), without any features, so I just need a sponsor for it (Thanks Luca!). Any takers? :) ** Summary changed: - needs python 2.6 transition and porting + Please update

Re: [Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Please provide a clear do this and then this sequence to fix a trashed Intrepid-Jaunty upgrade. This makes sure you use archive.ubuntu.com and not xx.archive.ubuntu.com: sudo sed -i 's#http://\S*archive\.ubuntu\.com#http://archive.ubuntu.com#' /etc/apt/sources.list Then you simply update:

[Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
gmail broke the commands, here you go an updated list of commands: sudo sed -i 's#http://\S*archive\.ubuntu\.com#http://archive.ubuntu.com#' /etc/apt/sources.list sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get -f install sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Mind you that I haven't tried it and it might not work as

[Bug 289191] Re: Nokia 6500 Classic not supported yet

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2194719 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2194719 -- Nokia 6500 Classic not supported yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 354488] Re: Python 2.6 fails to upgrade

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 This bug was fixed, please try one of these solutions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-central/+bug/354228/comments/17

[Bug 354457] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 This bug was fixed, please try one of these solutions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-central/+bug/354228/comments/17

[Bug 354753] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zur?ck

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 This bug was fixed, please try one of these solutions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-central/+bug/354228/comments/17

[Bug 354586] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0 .1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess p ost-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 This bug was fixed, please try one of these solutions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-central/+bug/354228/comments/17

[Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
I'm not sure, but is any action required for python3.0 to work? Personally, I've installed it without any problems now that correct python-central is in the archive. It shows the INFO: using unkown version ... line. :) ** Also affects: python3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
Well... I eventually decided to keep python-support, could prove better in the future. I added a setup.py to do the legwork for the data installation. PPA Build: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa/+build/928193 Reflects revision 34 in gapti trunk:

[Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
P.S. I'm sorry if the changes in the ChangeLog seem messy. :) -- needs python 2.6 transition and porting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 296267] Re: FFe: Please sync with upstream version of Midori to the latest version, the current version is very unstable alpha

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hi, I thought of providing some more info for this bug report: v0.1.5: + Add a Colorful Tabs extension + Support downloading with WebKitGTK+ 1.1.3 + Load and save settings of extensions + Drop internal source view + Require WebKitGTK+ 1.1.1, Glib 2.16 and libsoup 2.25.2 v0.1.4: + Automatic

[Bug 296267] Re: FFe: Please sync with upstream version of Midori to the latest version, the current version is very unstable alpha

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
I guess the only (important?) bug fix in these versions is this one: + Fix blank page 'loading' and HTTP authentication The rest of them seem improvements, featureful, yet I don't know if the ubuntu admins/packagers would allow this. :) -- FFe: Please sync with upstream version of Midori to

Re: [Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
It still needs some work - I'll revert to the old cdbs, it seems better to keep it that way. Give me two days :) -- needs python 2.6 transition and porting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
I mean I'll make a bugfix release (0.0.3) and ask for an FFe upload. -- needs python 2.6 transition and porting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 314038] Re: Integrated video interface is broken in Jaunty

2009-04-01 Thread Savvas Radevic
Is anyone providing a deb package for jaunty of vlc 1.0 yet? On 4/1/09, eruanno anacro...@gmail.com wrote: Please do! I've been using Savvas' 0.9.x series vlc with integrated video. I compiled the vlc1.0 prerelease, and it fixes the video integration flawlessly. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:26

Re: [Bug 314038] Re: Integrated video interface is broken in Jaunty

2009-04-01 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ah no, sorry, Rémi mentioned an RC (release candidate?) version in a comment above. As far as I can see, 0.9.9 is out :) -- Integrated video interface is broken in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 315679] Re: Please merge libmtp 0.3.0-1ubuntu3 (main) to 0.3.6-1 from Debian (experimental)

2009-04-01 Thread Savvas Radevic
Since it took me so long to learn about the upgrading process, libmtp 0.3.7-1 is in Debian experimental now, if anyone wants to take over to update this, please do. :) But before doing any work on this, I'd like to know if the main sponsors are interested in approving this merge for jaunty. If

Re: [Bug 94011] Re: [needs-packaging] Frostwire

2009-03-31 Thread Savvas Radevic
Make sure you upload it to www.ubuntuwire.org for help with packaging and inclusion in ubuntu. :) -- [needs-packaging] Frostwire https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 337696] Re: package python-wxgtk2.6 2.6.3.2.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/wxPython/__init__.py', which is also in package python-

2009-03-31 Thread Savvas Radevic
z, if it's a simple patch, please attach a debdiff: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff -- package python-wxgtk2.6 2.6.3.2.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/wxPython/__init__.py', which is also in package

[Bug 350523] Re: Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner

2009-03-30 Thread Savvas Radevic
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :) ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Policy violation - Conflicts:

[Bug 350523] Re: Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner

2009-03-29 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: brasero Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner was added due to this announcement: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce- list/2009-January/msg6.html Namely, brasero

[Bug 344189] Re: Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8

2009-03-29 Thread Savvas Radevic
If you wish to try out the correct el.mo you can try out the attached package (Built on Ubuntu 9.04 jaunty jackalope) ** Attachment added: devede_3.12c-0ubuntu2_all.deb http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492334/devede_3.12c-0ubuntu2_all.deb -- Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8

[Bug 344189] Re: Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8

2009-03-29 Thread Savvas Radevic
Attached the build log (pbuilder-dist) with debc. ** Attachment added: build_log.log.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492416/build_log.log.gz -- Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344189 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 342450] Re: Please sync imgseek 0.8.6-3 from debian unstable

2009-03-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
Here's the changelog: * debian/control: + Standards-Version: 3.8.1 (No change required) + Build-Depends: Added python-support, dpatch. Removed python-central + XS-Python-Version: current changed to = 2.2 * debian/copyright: Updated GPL-2 license, use GPL-2 in common-licenses

[Bug 342450] Re: Please sync imgseek 0.8.6-3 from debian unstable

2009-03-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: imgseek (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: imgseek (Ubuntu) Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) = (unassigned) -- Please sync imgseek 0.8.6-3 from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342450 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 342450] Re: Please sync imgseek 0.8.6-3 from debian unstable

2009-03-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa/+build/921612 https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa/+build/921613 https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa/+build/921614 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24446214/imgseek_0.8.6-3~ppajaunty1.diff.gz

[Bug 350523] [NEW] Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner

2009-03-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner was added due to this announcement: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce- list/2009-January/msg6.html Namely, brasero is replacing

Re: [Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
Most links are now fine for me, but I can still reproduce it with test7withusrbin.py Hew, try it with a new username, it's possible that you have registered the proper mime settings locally in your home configuration. :) -- firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >