[Bug 1444304] [NEW] uuuoo

Public bug reported: ... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu8.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-49.83-generic 3.13.11-ckt17 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-49-generic i686 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.9 Architecture: i386

[Bug 1318818] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04

Hello, I still haven't found a solution to this problem. I was hoping that an update of the release upgrader package would fix the problem, but this didn't happen. And now Ubuntu tells me 13.10 is not supported anymore... Is there any alternative to a fresh reinstall? Thx, VV -- You received

[Bug 1322306] Re: Cannot upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04

Hello, I think I've got the same problem reported here : Bug #1318818. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thx, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322306 Title: Cannot upgrade

[Bug 1318818] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04

I just found that Bug #1322306 seems related to this one. If anyone has an idea on how to solve this, I'm still stuck. Thx, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318818 Title: Can't

[Bug 1318818] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04

it doesn't appear in such a state when I open synaptic. I don't know how to solve this. Is there a way to diagnose the bug more precisely? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1318818] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04

Hi Brian, thanks for your answer, but I don't understand why the upgrade process considers some packages are in a keep this version state. When I check in Synaptic, I don't see any package in such a state... Any idea? Cheers, Vivien -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1318818] [NEW] Can't upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04

d'origine Thx for your help! Vv ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.205.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-20.35-generic 3.11.10.6 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu Date

[Bug 1050509] Re: Duplicity doesn't handle non-utf8 filenames well

Hello François, thanks for your help. I don't have any system-backup.gz neither examples folder in /usr/share/doc/duplicity/. So I changed the language of my session (from fr_FR.UTF-8 to fr_FR.UTF-8) in the system preferences, and now backups are working again. Cheers, Vv -- You received

[Bug 1050509] Re: Duplicity doesn't handle non-utf8 filenames well

Hello, what exactly do you call your backup script? I launch duplicity with deja-dup from the unity menu, and I don't see how to specify the locale this way. Thanks for your help, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1050509] Re: Duplicity doesn't handle non-utf8 filenames well

not been able to backup my files for quite some time now... Is there at least a way to know which file causes the problem? Thanks, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050509 Title

[Bug 1073117] Re: duplicity fails with 'ascii' codec can't decode byte error

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 989496 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989496 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 989496 UnicodeDecodeError during backup due to non-utf8 translation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1016850] Re: duplicity crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in __main__: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 1066: ordinal not in range(128)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 989496 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989496 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 989496 UnicodeDecodeError during backup due to non-utf8 translation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1050509] Re: Duplicity doesn't handle non-utf8 filenames well

with the previous one (which was UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 23: ordinal not in range(128)). Does anyone has an idea about the origin of the problem? Thanks in advance, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 989496] Re: UnicodeDecodeError during backup due to non-utf8 translation

can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 23: ordinal not in range(128) Any help would be appreciated on this. Thanks, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989496 Title: UnicodeDecodeError

[Bug 1050509] Re: Duplicity doesn't handle non-utf8 filenames well

/duplicity/collections.py file? Thanks for your help, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050509 Title: Duplicity doesn't handle non-utf8 filenames well To manage notifications about

[Bug 989496] Re: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xd1 in position 117

not in range(128) Cheers, Vv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989496 Title: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xd1 in position 117 To manage notifications about this bug

Re: [Bug 659438] Re: Installation/Removal fails because of packagewhich could not be located (failure in apt.Cache.required_download)

dont be greedy, spend some money and switch to windows. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, John Weintraub 659...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: Dear Sir I don not understand enough about bug reports to even begin to know if this bug has been fixed and if so, what the solution is. I would LOVE a

Re: Re: [Bug 659438] Re: Installation/Removal fails because of packagewhich could not be located (fa

better that hell than this heaven. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:33 AM, alesskata 659...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: ma ti vo nel culo a te ea windows (translate: go to hell, you and windows) Il giorno , vv 659...@bugs.launchpad.net ha scritto: dont be greedy, spend some money and switch

Re: [Bug 659438] Re: Installation/Removal fails because ofpackagewhich could not be located (failure inapt.Cache.required_download)

greed, it's about being a leader not a follower. -- Ken -Original Message- From: vv 659...@bugs.launchpad.net Sender: boun...@canonical.com Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:24:48 To: mailto...@gmail.com Reply-To: Bug 659438 659...@bugs.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Bug 659438] Re

Re: [Bug 659438] Re: Installation/Removal fails because ofpackagewhich could not be located (failure inapt.Cache.required_download)

...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: I fixed within two days finding a manual install for Java, then canceling (removing) the package that failed halfway through. Wasn't hard to find. And it's not about greed, it's about being a leader not a follower. -- Ken -Original Message- From: vv 659...@bugs.launchpad.net

Re: [Bug 659438] Re: Installation/Removal fails because of packagewhich could not be located (failure in apt.Cache.required_download)

my goal is not to troubleshoot baboontu either. all i have to do is just load my simple app and compile it. that seems too hard for such a superior os that was cleanly installed from a fresh distro into a virgin VM. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Michael D Stigers 659...@bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 777740] Re: type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the fp-compiler package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.

-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40 Title: type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the fp-compiler package. This might mean you need to manually fix this

[Bug 777740] [NEW] type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the fp-compiler package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptdaemon it prompted me to submit this. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: aptdaemon 0.41+bzr646-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Annotation: Applying software

[Bug 663480] [NEW] ATI proprietary driver (fglrx) does not provide correct EDID data

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: fglrx I ran into this bug when using gnome-color-manager (2.32.0-0, in Pascal de Brujin's PPA). GCM could not correctly detect my screen and gave me an error output when trying to dump EDID data: failed to parse edid. The screen's EDID is correct since

[Bug 663480] Re: ATI proprietary driver (fglrx) does not provide correct EDID data

-- ATI proprietary driver (fglrx) does not provide correct EDID data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com