Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: transmission
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch)
Release:10.04
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy transmission
transmission:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.92-0ubuntu1
Version table:
1.92-0ubuntu1 0
500
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42141699/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42141701/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42141702/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35966957/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35966958/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35966959/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:9.10
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy sun-java6-doc
sun-java6-doc:
Installed: 6-15-1
Candidate: 6-15-1
Version table:
*** 6-15-1 0
500 http://jp.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/multiverse Packages
100
I algo get the backtrace on Kubuntu. The result is attached in this
comment.
** Attachment added: backtrace result on Kubuntu
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27324279/gdb-tulip-onKubuntu.txt
--
tulip crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230368
You received this bug notification
I checked the difference between them.
It seemed there was little difference except register numbers.
Maybe, this bug is common on some ubuntu distributions.
--
tulip crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thank you for your comment, Caroline ! Sorry for this late reply.
The environment I got the backtrace was on Ubuntu.
As you kindly pointed out, my backtrace was without some dbgsym packages.
After installing some *-dbgsym packages lacking, I get the backtrace again.
The result is attached in
** Changed in: tulip (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: tulip (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = afujihara (afujihara)
--
tulip crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I'm also experiencing this bug with the following error message.
$ tulip
get fences failed: -1
param: 6, val: 0
Segmentation fault
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy tulip
tulip:
Installed: 3.0.0~B6-2.1
Candidate: 3.0.0~B6-2.1
I upload the (tar gzipped) strace result of my environment by following the
instruction in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Strace .
** Attachment added: strace result
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27075657/strace-tulip.log.tar.gz
--
tulip crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230368
I also upload my backtrace result by following
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace .
** Attachment added: backtrace result
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27075777/gdb-tulip.txt
--
tulip crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230368
You received this bug notification because you are
I start triaging the bug and firstly, ask if this is reproducible.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = afujihara (afujihara)
--
firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in xcb_generate_id()
https
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
--
firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in
: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = afujihara (afujihara)
--
firefox crashed visiting apple site
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360756
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = afujihara (afujihara)
--
firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in gfxTextRun::DrawGlyphs()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362593
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = afujihara (afujihara)
--
firefox closes when browsing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
(Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = afujihara (afujihara)
--
Firefox hangs for no reason
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357433
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Recently, Jaunty beta has been released. So, I decided to upgrade from Intrepid
to check
whether the printer worked in Jaunty. Fortunately, it does works in Jaunty beta
as well as
it did in Hardy.
Even though the cause of the bug is not found, this problem is solved
with upgrading to
Thank you, Markus!
--
hugday crashed with Please run 'hugday current --remember' or give a date in
get_url()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329698
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Paul says all what I want to say.
Can you fix it to avoid error messages, Markus?
--
hugday crashed with Please run 'hugday current --remember' or give a date in
get_url()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329698
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23294409/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス pre-installation
script はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336667
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release:9.04
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy glibc-2.9-1
glibc-2.9-1:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
When I was upgrading Jaunty, it suddenly happened.
ProblemType: Package
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-matplotlib
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release:9.04
Codename: jaunty
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy python-matplotlib
python-matplotlib:
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release:9.04
Codename: jaunty
$ apt-cache policy libcanberra-gtk0
libcanberra-gtk0:
インストールされているバージョン: 0.6-0ubuntu3
候補: 0.11-1ubuntu1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22003909/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22003910/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package libcanberra-gtk0 0.6-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdic-eijiro
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10
~$ LANG=C apt-cache policy sdic-eijiro
sdic-eijiro:
Installed: 2.1.3-16
Candidate: 2.1.3-16
Version table:
*** 2.1.3-16 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com
it is the same one I reported before because it hasn't
already spend many
CPU resources.)
afujihara
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Luke Yelavich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is this bug still an issue in Ubuntu 8.10?
** Changed in: gnome-speech (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
orca
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16
linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic:
Installed: 2.6.27-7.16
Candidate: 2.6.27-7.16
Version table:
*** 2.6.27-7.16 0
500
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19979339/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19979340/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19979341/Dependencies.txt
**
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10
I couldn't identify the package that causes the bug.
My printer (Ricoh IPSiO NX730N) won't print documents after upgrading from 8.04
to 8.10.
I usually use Ricoh ps driver Ver.3.0.1 (265 KB) on Ubuntu 8.04
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04
Release:8.04
I upgrade ubuntu from 7.10 to 8.04.
After the upgrading is finished and the system is rebooted, the following
error message is displayed.
---
Error activating XKB configuration.
It can happen under
Thank you for your message. Sorry for very late response.
I'm afraid I can't remember the steps. Sorry for this...
But, s-spot crushs today. So, I report this to the launchpad.
I hope this would be helpful for fixing bugs. Thank you.
--
f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV
I forgot to add the link of the bug report.
You can see this at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/f-spot/+bug/218535
--
f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
When I enter from the terminal sudo aptitude install cabextract to install
cabextract,
the installation fails and the system crushs.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12820066/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12820067/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package python-wxgtk2.8 2.8.7.1-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ??
post-installation
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 194051 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194051
Public bug reported:
~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l jockey-common
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 194051 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194051
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12134438/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12134439/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 194051 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194051
Public bug reported:
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l jockey-gtk
Public bug reported:
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l jockey-gtk
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Thank you for your response. I run jockey-gtk from the console under the
condition that the newest python-central(ver. 0.5.50ubuntu7) is
installed, that is,
$ jockey-gtk
[1] 12337
$
After a short time, a window labeled Hardware Drivers appears (, then
I close the window). It seems that there
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12134412/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12134413/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package jockey-gtk 0.2-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems
- leaving
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 194051 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194051
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12134485/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Devices.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12134486/Devices.txt
** Attachment added:
Thank you, guys! I update and run amule to see how it works.
When I run amule as root, it works well, meaning connections to severs are
established.
The console output is attached as follows.
---(beginning of console output)---
$ sudo amule
[1] 9583
$ Initialising aMule
Checking if there is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197444 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197444
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l gvfs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197444 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197444
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12361550/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12361551/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 196201 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196201
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 196201 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196201
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12353054/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12353055/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added:
Public bug reported:
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l festival
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264620/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264621/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264622/ProcStatus.txt
--
orca won't
Have you try other lighter window managers? I mean, for example, Xfce4 on
Xubuntu?
If GNOME is the cause of slower loading, it may be a little faster, and maybe
you like it.
--
Ubuntu is slower than Windows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195067
You received this bug notification because you
Thank you for your message. I remake the backtrace after installing
libxcb1-dbg and libx11-6-dbg as you instructed. I hope you can find the
crucial point of this bug this time. Good luck!
** Attachment added: gdb-amule-no3.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12084222/gdb-amule-no3.txt
--
amule
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l update-manager
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12079096/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12079097/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package update-manager 1:0.87.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-apt
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l python-apt
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12079149/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12079150/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package python-apt 0.7.4ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
$ dpkg -l update-manager
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12079116/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12079117/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package update-manager-core 1:0.87.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation
Oops, sorry. I forgot to install the package. After installing amule-
dbgsym, I remake the backtrace, which is attached in this message. Thank
you for your kind response.
** Attachment added: gdb-amule-no2.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12052058/gdb-amule-no2.txt
--
amule crashed with
Thank you for your message. I'm sorry for this late response. I make the
backtrace following the instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace. The
backtrace file is attached in this message. According to the file,
Segmentation fault occurs when amule tries to retrieve a server list. I
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 183685 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11765909/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11765910/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 183685 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
~$ dpkg -l
61 matches
Mail list logo
