Thanks Stephane. I'd just finally got time to look into LXC which because
I used ubuntu led me to Arkose.
I think whatever the outcome the documentation of Ubuntu's LXC support,
capabilities, etc is going to become very important.
Some Service Providers (SPs), for cloud are looking at
Public bug reported:
Trying to use Arkose on AWS EC2 using Canonical 11.10 AMI.
Arkose fails and all I can see is some flashed reference that seems to indicate
AUFS is not available?
I think I saw a reference to aufs being dropped in newer ubuntu versions?
** Affects: arkose (Ubuntu)
Omer
You know I wish I can figure out (under Unity) how better to capture some of
this. Unfortunately, things I used to be able to do in previous ubuntu
under gnome 2 don't seem to be so easy now under Unity.
Explaining it in words is almost as much as I can do.
1) I start VLC
2) VLC displays
its not consistent.
If I start VLC then select to add files I can add one or more .mp3 or
.mpg files to VLC's play list.
Sometimes it just gets stuck at the play list with no way to get back to
viewing a movie if that's whats playing. Sometimes, the little list icon
at the top changes to
Public bug reported:
The VLC menu's are very disfunctional under Unity. If you start VLC,
then search for mp3 or mpg files to play there usually is no way to get
back to actually viewing the moving you are left at the VLC list
screen which displays the list of files to be played but there is no
I just installed 11.04 released version and Synaptic won't accept
passwords if launched with gksu from the menu but will if synaptic is
launched with sudo from the command line
Are you sure this bug ever fixed for the release?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On Ubuntu's website a search for UEC (ubuntu enterprise cloud) give you:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/PackageInstall
Since UEC is based on Eucalyptus I think you could learn a lot by
downloading and reading the Eucalyptus Beginner’s Guide – UEC edition v2.0 –
On Ubuntu's website a search for UEC (ubuntu enterprise cloud) give you:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/PackageInstall
Since UEC is based on Eucalyptus I think you could learn a lot by
downloading and reading the Eucalyptus Beginner’s Guide – UEC edition v2.0 –
I'd forgotten about this because I'd gotten an email that someone had junked
it already? That was a couple months ago.
I would have to go back and retest but from watching some of the lists there
still seems to be a fair number of people describing
the same symptoms.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at
I'd forgotten about this because I'd gotten an email that someone had junked
it already? That was a couple months ago.
I would have to go back and retest but from watching some of the lists there
still seems to be a fair number of people describing
the same symptoms.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at
I too would like to see this seg fault problem fixed. Its been there for
several years now and
still shows up on Ubuntu 10.10 rdesktop.
Using a java rdp client on the very same machine works but it lacks some
of the useful options of rdesktop.
Anyway the java client works and rdesktop fails
I've done that. (use sudo to register the nodes).. the NC does not register
correctly..
From google searches It seems a lot of people are having this same
problem ?
thanks tho'.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, C de-Avillez hgg...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Thank you for opening this bug and helping
I've done that. (use sudo to register the nodes).. the NC does not register
correctly..
From google searches It seems a lot of people are having this same
problem ?
thanks tho'.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, C de-Avillez hgg...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Thank you for opening this bug and helping
Public bug reported:
I had been having problems with UEC on ubuntu 10.10 getting the Node
Controllers (NC) to register correctly.
Finally, after searching both the Ubuntu and Eucalyptus forums (and
launchpad bugs) I found the following message on the Eucalyptus forum:
= = = = = = =
** Description changed:
I had been having problems with UEC on ubuntu 10.10 getting the Node
Controllers (NC) to register correctly.
Finally, after searching both the Ubuntu and Eucalyptus forums (and
launchpad bugs) I found the following message on the Eucalyptus forum:
= = = = =
Public bug reported:
I had been having problems with UEC on ubuntu 10.10 getting the Node
Controllers (NC) to register correctly.
Finally, after searching both the Ubuntu and Eucalyptus forums (and
launchpad bugs) I found the following message on the Eucalyptus forum:
= = = = = = =
** Description changed:
I had been having problems with UEC on ubuntu 10.10 getting the Node
Controllers (NC) to register correctly.
Finally, after searching both the Ubuntu and Eucalyptus forums (and
launchpad bugs) I found the following message on the Eucalyptus forum:
= = = = =
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ffmpeg
Ubuntu 10.10 desktop
Although I read that libavutil49 is part of ffmpeg
After installing ffmpeg (or reinstalling) when I try to execute qemu-img I get
the following error:
qemu-img: error while loading shared libraries: libavutil.so.49:
This has been resolved.
This bug needs to be deleted.
--
qemu-img: error while loading shared libraries: libavutil.so.49: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or director
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
qemu-img: error while loading shared libraries: libavutil.so.49: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or director
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
it is still affecting 10.10 ... at least on my machine but not as bad as on
10.04.
On 10.04 its gotten better as it fails to boot less often BUT again on 10.04
with th .17 kernel it ALWAYS boots.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Jeremy Foshee
610...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
This bug report
5-6 times. It will eventually boot again.
Brian
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:04 PM, brian mullan bmullan.m...@gmail.comwrote:
thanks Jeremy... I knew there had to be something along those lines causing
this.
I'll try to fix and let you know as my encountering this problem is pretty
thanks Jeremy... I knew there had to be something along those lines causing
this.
I'll try to fix and let you know as my encountering this problem is pretty
consistent each week.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Foshee
610...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
Hi folks,
We have discovered
attached is my /var/log/kern.log file
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Mitch Towner mitch.towner.ubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
** Tags removed: needs-kernel-logs
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
In Lucid (10.04)...
I've had a problem on my AMD based machine, 4core, Gigabyte ga-ma78gm-
s2h Motherboard, 8GB mem, two 2 SATA terabyte HDs.
One thing I've found is that ANY kernel *AFTER* 2.6.32-17
apport information
** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585615/AplayDevices.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585616/ArecordDevices.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
apport information
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585617/BootDmesg.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585618/Card0.Amixer.values.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
apport information
** Attachment added: Card1.Amixer.values.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585620/Card1.Amixer.values.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585619/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
apport information
** Attachment added: Card2.Codecs.codec.0.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585622/Card2.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
apport information
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585624/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585626/Lspci.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
apport information
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585628/Lsusb.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
apport information
** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585632/PciMultimedia.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585633/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585637/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585639/ProcModules.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585647/UdevDb.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585675/UdevLog.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52585696/WifiSyslog.txt
--
kernels after 2.6.32-17 have random failures in booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
First, as I'd said in the bug report... its a hit or miss whether the newer
kernels (post -17) boot completely or not.
This morning... the very same *2.6.32-24* kernel booted right up first
time? Last night I tried a dozen times both cold and warm boot and it
would never get to login screen
Update... and tonite I rebooted same machine and -24 fails but again -17
boots right up
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:27 AM, brian mullan
bmullan.m...@gmail.comwrote:
First, as I'd said in the bug report... its a hit or miss whether the newer
kernels (post -17) boot completely
update - tonite I reboot this *same system* and now *2.6.32-24 will
not*completely boot to login again
BUT again 2.6.32-17 boots right up and works?
Something introduced after -17 kernel update is causing the problem.
Brian
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:27 AM, brian mullan bmullan.m
Public bug reported:
In Lucid (10.04)...
I've had a problem on my AMD based machine, 4core, Gigabyte ga-ma78gm-
s2h Motherboard, 8GB mem, two 2 SATA terabyte HDs.
One thing I've found is that ANY kernel *AFTER* 2.6.32-17
has this randomness at boot time whether the system will completely boot
Thanks for working on getting the SPICE server and client into the
Ubuntu Repositories.
This will be a great addition for remote desktop capabilities.
--
[needs-packaging] SPICE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
I recently bought a Western Digital WD10EARS 1 TB SATA drive.
This WD drive incorporates what is called Advanced Format on the
drive:
See:
** Attachment added: Advanced Format Tech Info Sheet.pdf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48867729/Advanced%20Format%20Tech%20Info%20Sheet.pdf
--
Ubuntu 10.04 and Western DIgital's new Advanced Format SATA drives - constant
drive errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583790
You received this
There's no complicated work here to prove the Advanced Format used by the
WD drives don't work.
Install the drive into a machine and try to install from an Ubuntu CD...
install eventually works but there are constant disk busy/time-out retry
errors occurring.
I'm not sure what you want?What
Sorry but I don't have either of those drives any longer as I couldn't log
in to them once Ubuntu was installed. After
the 1st one was exhibiting drive errors I returned it thinking it was bad.
But the replacement was the same model
and it exhibited exactly the same disk errors.
I can send you
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
I recently bought a Western Digital WD10EARS 1 TB SATA drive.
This WD drive incorporates what is called Advanced Format on the
drive:
See:
apport information
** Attachment added: UbiquityDebug.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48894632/UbiquityDebug.gz
--
Ubuntu 10.04 and Western DIgital's new Advanced Format SATA drives - constant
drive errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583790
You received this bug notification because
apport information
** Attachment added: UbiquitySyslog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48894637/UbiquitySyslog.gz
--
Ubuntu 10.04 and Western DIgital's new Advanced Format SATA drives - constant
drive errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583790
You received this bug notification because
apport information
** Attachment added: UbiquityPartman.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48894634/UbiquityPartman.gz
--
Ubuntu 10.04 and Western DIgital's new Advanced Format SATA drives - constant
drive errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583790
You received this bug notification
Are both clouds on the same network segment?
If so is there any chance that the NC of the 2nd cloud confused as to which
CLC it belongs to?
Is DHCP configured in both CLC's?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Torsten Spindler tors...@canonical.comwrote:
The first existing cloud was using the
Mattias
the wireless router attached to my cable modem provides a NAT'd DHCP
192.16.x.x network
*clc* (192.168.x.x 255.255.255.*0*) ---
|--[*wireless
bridge*]---[ (wifi=192.168.1.1)* wireless router *(eth=70.x.x.x)
Mattias
the wireless router attached to my cable modem provides a NAT'd DHCP
192.16.x.x network
*clc* (192.168.x.x 255.255.255.*0*) ---
|--[*wireless
bridge*]---[ (wifi=192.168.1.1)* wireless router *(eth=70.x.x.x)
Public bug reported:
UEC install using Ubuntu 10.04 Server CD.
Followed directions on:
https://help/ubuntu.com/community/UEC/CDInstall
tried to follow verbatum so on STEP 2.4 I used
192.168.1.200-192.168.1.249
setup the ENV
Launched an instance successfully.
Using ElasticFox I
Public bug reported:
I tried both the latest Beta x64 ISO's for Desktop and for Server and
both end up failing.
They report that either the DVD/CD is bad -or- the Hard Disk is bad.
I've tried 2 different hard disks -- one was new and unformatted.
-- HD's are eSata
-- one was Hitachi and one was
clarification:
I was able to install and boot Lucid SERVER BUT
if I then do the following
sudo su
apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
to get a desktop installed, after the desktop is installed and the system is
rebooted it will not complete the boot
into Ubuntu 10.04... which is the
I went back and burned a CD with the last Lucid Alpha release.
Used the same CD/DVD drive as with the beta ISO.
Installation of the Alpha release ISO works !
So it appears something broke for installation between the Alpha and
Beta releases.
FYI -- using the Beta ISO file to install the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
Downloaded Adobe's 64 bit flash. It is alpha/beta release but it did
work in Firefox under KARMIC but does not under Lucid.
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: firefox
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43983766/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43983767/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
the 64 bit Adobe Flash driver doesn't work with Firefox in Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
101 - 165 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
