[Bug 1502825] [NEW] package libc6-dbg 2.19-0ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/debug/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libm-2.19.so' to '/usr/lib/debug/lib/i386-linux-gnu/

2015-10-05 Thread Somers DWG
Public bug reported: occured by first installation from USB-stick ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: libc6-dbg 2.19-0ubuntu6.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion:

[Bug 1502831] [NEW] package libcuda1-340-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcuda.so.340.93' to '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc

2015-10-05 Thread Somers DWG
Public bug reported: update from 2015-10-05 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: libcuda1-340-updates (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.15

[Bug 116826] Re: wake up from suspend ends up as hiberate

2007-11-01 Thread dwg
Same symptoms here. -- wake up from suspend ends up as hiberate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-09-07 Thread dwg
Yes, I'm running gutsy, no upload here either. -- ccontrol SEGVs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-09-07 Thread dwg
Diffs are all very well, but is there any ETA on actually getting the fixed package into the repository? -- ccontrol SEGVs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-08-26 Thread dwg
Ok. It would be good to backport the fix to Feisty at least, which also has this bug. -- ccontrol SEGVs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 131961] Re: Segfaults during boot (from mount)

2007-08-19 Thread dwg
Have you used update-initramfs to rebuild the ramdisks once the new busybox was installed? -- Segfaults during boot (from mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 131961] Re: Segfaults during boot (from mount)

2007-08-18 Thread dwg
The busybox fix works here. -- Segfaults during boot (from mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 132289] Re: [gutsy] segmentation fault during boot in /scripts/init-bottom

2007-08-18 Thread dwg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131961 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131961 There's now a fix, see the log for bug #131961, of which this is a duplicate. ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- [gutsy] segmentation fault during boot in

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-08-17 Thread dwg
The version with -fno-stack-protectore doesn't seem to have showed up in the gutsy archive yet. Any ETA on that? -- ccontrol SEGVs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-08-16 Thread dwg
Yes, I've been using a custom build with -fno-strack-protector for some time. I just retested on the latest source package and it still appears to work (although I quickly found an unrelated bug in ccontrol-init). -- ccontrol SEGVs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109157 You received

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
No dice, I'm afraid. mulberryst:~$ ccontrol Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- ccontrol SEGVs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 109157] Re: ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
Oh, that's with: mulberryst:~$ dpkg -p ccontrol Package: ccontrol Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 144 Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Version: 0.9.1+20060806-3 Depends: python, gcc, make, binutils, ccache Suggests: distcc Size: 33170

[Bug 131961] Re: segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
I'm also observing this problem. Here, with a root-on-lvm-on-raid1 setup, these failures confuse the udev initialization sufficiently that although the system boots, it fails to mount any filesystems other than root, and things are generally confused later on. This looks like the same problem as

[Bug 132120] Re: busybox 1:1.1.3-5ubuntu3 mount -o bind crash

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131961 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131961 This appears to be the same problem as bug #131961. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 131961 segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic -- busybox 1:1.1.3-5ubuntu3 mount -o bind crash

[Bug 87745] Re: Root fs on LVM on mdadm fails to boot

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
Sorry, my mistake. Somehow I had an /et/mdadm/mdadm.conf with bogus UUID causing the raid assembly failure. Looks like this is, indeed, fixed. -- Root fs on LVM on mdadm fails to boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 131961] Re: segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
In reference to Robert Vollmert's comment: not having any other filesystems would explain why you don't get further symptoms. For me, this is a serious bug. In fact, contrary to my previous comment, the system won't really boot after this - instead it will give the give root password for

[Bug 131961] Re: segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
As bug #132120 suggests, I've verified that just replacing the busybox binary (both as /bin/busybox and /bin/sh on the initramfs) with an older, working version is sufficient to fix the problem. Replacing the failing calls to mount with explicit calls to /bin/mount - thereby invoking the klibc

[Bug 131961] Re: segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
Martin, but are you seeing the SEGVs during boot? -- segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 131961] Re: segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
Ok. How are the devices for your secondary filesystems specified in /etc/fstab? For me at least, the problem seems to be that some of the convenience symlinks are not created, so depending on the names you use, it might work. -- segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

[Bug 131961] Re: segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic

2007-08-15 Thread dwg
Uh.. did you forget an attachment there? -- segfault when booting 2.6.22-9-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 87745] Root fs on LVM on mdadm still fails to boot

2007-07-18 Thread dwg
I'm afraid that mdadm 2.6.2-1ubuntu2 doesn't fix the problem here. Or rather, it changes the problem. Now, I drop to an (initramfs) prompt with one of my md devices unassembled. Previously the md devices all assembled but LVM did not get started. Now, if I manually assemble the md at the

[Bug 87745] Re: Root fs on LVM fails to boot

2007-06-02 Thread dwg
I've also observed this problem in gutsy: LVM on md (raid1) fails to boot, an lvm vgchange -ay on at the (initramfs) prompt is sufficient to get it working. My investigations show two parts to the problem. First, udev's 65 -persistent-storage.rules file explicitly excludes md* devices from

[Bug 82108] Re: forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume

2007-04-24 Thread dwg
I didn't ever see the problem with edgy. However, it's been present for most of the Feisty development cycle. -- forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82108 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 109157] ccontrol SEGVs on startup

2007-04-23 Thread dwg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ccontrol In Feisty, ccontrol as built from the current ccontrol package gets a Segmentation Fault immediately after exec(), before executing any other system calls. This appears to be because Feisty has made gcc implement stack protection by default,

[Bug 109155] workrave's counter does not update

2007-04-23 Thread dwg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: workrave In Feisty, workrave's rest break countdown in the panel no longer decrements visibly. It still appears to count down internally, and will eventually pop up the take a rest dialog, however the on-screen counter never changes, except occasionally

[Bug 93509] Re: xorg fails with ati driver with feisty on Apple ppc (post herd5 update)

2007-04-22 Thread dwg
I've hit this problem as well on a G5 with Radeon, in Feisty final. Driver package version is 6.6.3-2ubuntu6. With Ben Herrenschmidt's help, tracked the problem down to an Ubuntu patch which adds some VBE based DDC probing code to the driver as a fallback. That gets triggered on powerpc, and VBE

[Bug 82108] Re: forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume

2007-03-01 Thread dwg
Bug also appears with the 2.6.20-9-generic kernel. -- forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume https://launchpad.net/bugs/82108 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 82108] Re: forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume

2007-02-23 Thread dwg
Like you, I have finite time, I just haven't had a chance to send in the information yet. Incidentally, apologies for the lack of information in the first place. I got sloppy :(. godiva:~$ uname -a Linux godiva 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 01:14:41 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci

[Bug 82108] Re: forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume

2007-02-23 Thread dwg
** Attachment added: dmesg output after clean boot http://librarian.launchpad.net/6522000/dmesg-boot.log -- forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume https://launchpad.net/bugs/82108 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 82108] Re: forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume

2007-02-23 Thread dwg
Here is the dmesg output after a resume (same boot as the previous dmesg attachment). On this occasion, the MAC address was clobbered. In fact, I just noticed that the clobbered MAC address (which is always the same) is the correct MAC address reversed byte-for-byte: 58:41:6D:2F:11:00 instead of

[Bug 82108] forcedeth changes MAC address after suspend/resume

2007-01-29 Thread dwg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.20-5-generic After an ACPI suspend-to-RAM and resume, the inbuilt Nforce2 ethernet adaptor has a different MAC address than it has on an initial boot. This did not occur with the kernel from edgy. ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)