[Bug 76598] Re: cdrom not detected in feisty

its not happening anymore! :) cheers, flai -- cdrom not detected in feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/76598 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 76341] Re: [Feisty] Linux 2.6.20 spams 'Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.' all over /var/log/messages

same error here ... feisty daily build 24-01-2007 not only in P4 but also on intel core processors tested with HP Compaq nc6320 (intel core duo) and P4 -- [Feisty] Linux 2.6.20 spams 'Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.' all over /var/log/messages https://launchpad.net/bugs/76341 --

[Bug 73051] Re: Monodevelop seg faults on close

not confirmed here working on with 2.6.17-10-generic #2 SMP Tue Dec 5 22:28:26 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux -- Monodevelop seg faults on close https://launchpad.net/bugs/73051 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 76598] Re: cdrom not detected in feisty

** Summary changed: - cdrom not detected in feisty daily 19-12-2006 + cdrom not detected in feisty -- cdrom not detected in feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/76598 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 76598] Re: cdrom not detected in feisty daily 19-12-2006

just fount that the mount command is failing with some error like this: mount failed: /dev/scd0 no such device still no error on dmesg or /var/log/syslog I'm lost and don't know where to get a cause/solution for this (this is happening on a hp/compaq nc6320 with a PIONEER DVDRW DVR-K17) --

[Bug 76598] Re: cdrom not detected in feisty daily 19-12-2006

i'm using the alternate install cd downloaded from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/ i dont thnik there's a liveCD for the daily builds -- cdrom not detected in feisty daily 19-12-2006 https://launchpad.net/bugs/76598 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 76598] cdrom not detected in feisty daily 19-12-2006

nc6320, if that matters) If someone needs more help/output on this, just ask. cheers, flai ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: in the feisty daily build of 19-12-2006 the install process goes smooth until it tries to get access

[Bug 46919] Opening .deb archive from konqueror gives error ir ark

Public bug reported: I've just downloaded Opera 9 Beta 2 and double clicking the .deb archive from konqueror (Static Qt Package) popups an error in ark saying: The utility is not in your PATH. However opening ark manually and then opening the archive from ark goes fine without trouble. I'm

[Bug 68143] Amarok crash on startup

Public bug reported: here's the console output [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ amarok X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 169 Major opcode: 147 Minor opcode: 3 Resource id: 0x0 Failed to open device X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 169 Major opcode:

[Bug 68143] Re: Amarok crash on startup

i noticed that restarting solves it :) still don't know what was it -- Amarok crash on startup https://launchpad.net/bugs/68143 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 68143] Re: Amarok crash on startup

from the KDE bug support i got this info, maybe it can help --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136283 aoliveira kdemail net changed: What|Removed

[Bug 54663] Re: Thunderbird crashes with segfault

its hapening on edgy also with ubuntu 6.10 and mozilla-thunderbird 1.5.0.7-0ubuntu1 OUTPUT: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mozilla-thunderbird DOUBLE-CLICK: 400 -- -1 THRESHOLD: 8 -- -1 Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- Thunderbird crashes with segfault https://launchpad.net/bugs/54663 --

Re: [Bug 64770] Re: gnome-screensaver crash

I'm sorry I don't know, since it happened only once and i was not present John Vivirito wrote: Does this happen on all screensavers or 1 in particular one? ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- gnome-screensaver crash

[Bug 64770] gnome-screensaver crash

Public bug reported: i dont know further info about this crash however i'll leave the crash log ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gnome-screensaver crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/64770 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 64770] Re: gnome-screensaver crash

** Attachment added: crash log http://librarian.launchpad.net/4706437/_usr_bin_gnome-screensaver.1000.crash -- gnome-screensaver crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/64770 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 59545] Re: Bug: Saving files like Ref:123

Also happens with Ref:124 :) -- Bug: Saving files like Ref:123 https://launchpad.net/bugs/59545 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 59545] Re: Bug: Saving files like Ref:123

yes is true. Same here. aribeiro (Portugal) -- Bug: Saving files like Ref:123 https://launchpad.net/bugs/59545 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs