you can check what exact version do you have in repos executing:
apt-cache show libidn2-0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843507
Title:
apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes
so it is already fixed?
which version is new package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843507
Title:
apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application
failures
in addition to #4 I had to purge all versions of libidn2-0 including
i386 executing SEVERAL TIMES:
dpkg --purge --force-all libidn2-0
so my full process was like:
wget
http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/main/libi/libidn2/libidn2-0_2.0.4-1.1build2_amd64.deb
dpkg --purge --force-all
I get what sabdfl is trying to achieve, but I don't understand why this isn't
just an option.
forcing people to log in on Ubuntu SSO to install or remove a package don't
seem a nice policy from a desktop perspective.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1629204 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629204
I just hit this bug and it's really a stopper for me.
I'll downgrade kernel until is resolved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I'm still hitting this bug in some machines.
Is there any known workaround?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722
Title:
hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll
several other machines are affected by this bug in our workplace.
not sure if it's worth to mention but one machine NOT displaying this
behavior is a 32b system, while the rest are 64b.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've confirmed that /usr/share/pam-configs/pam_script is NOT part of
upstream package.
There's even a warning in docs regarding PAM stack:
Pam_script.so is listed as required so failures will affect the outcome
of the PAM stack, particularly for authentication, which will lock a
user
I think profile belongs to package mantainer, not upstream.
at least that's what I can see on http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty
/libpam-script
just take a look at:
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libp/libpam-script/libpam-script_1.1.6-1.debian.tar.gz
--
You received this bug
I'm affected by this bug too.
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04
Codename: trusty
$ uname -a
Linux cprli0792 3.13.0-44-generic #73-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 16 00:22:43 UTC 2014
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
** Description changed:
I'm using smbnetfs for accesing a remote fileserver:
-smbnetfs on /tmp/test type fuse.smbnetfs
+ smbnetfs on /tmp/test type fuse.smbnetfs
(rw,nosuid,nodev,user=e1)
when I copy a directory with several (hundreds) of files performance is
really bad
Public bug reported:
I'm using smbnetfs for accesing a remote fileserver:
smbnetfs on /tmp/test type fuse.smbnetfs
(rw,nosuid,nodev,user=e1)
when I copy a directory with several (hundreds) of files performance is
really bad and it takes lot of time.
for example a directori with 300
** Attachment added: note that even if it says 4 minutes it actually takes a
lot more as it gets down to 20 kB/s
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1240870/+attachment/3880021/+files/Captura%20de%202013-10-17%2011%3A13%3A51.png
--
You received this bug notification
why this bug is still marked as Incomplete?
must I provide more info?
is there anything else I can do to help in this issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013
Title:
incorrect
message.
If I drag some file from nautilus to gnome-terminal I can see that an
additional slash is added. for example:
this file path: '/home/muzzol/NetSMB/networking/test.odt'
is converted to: '//home/muzzol/NetSMB/networking/test.odt'
and libreoffice fails to open it.
Not shure how
Hi,
I've done some more tests and I've found that using server side policy
instead of shadow policies it asks for new password as it should.
warning message behaves the same and it's too fast for user to see
something.
I've detecte a new problem about localization. when new password is
asked to
I'm not sure if this should be two separated issues:
- lightdm not displaying PAM messages: when some module shows a message
(Your password is expiring in 5 days) ligthdm should wait for some
seconds or even wait for user interaction (OK button).
- lightdm not giving option to change expired
Public bug reported:
I've configured LDAP auth with sssd package and lightdm is not
understanding policy messages.
when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's not true.
in /var/log/auth.log it says:
Jun 5 15:25:48 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): received
** Description changed:
I've configured LDAP auth with sssd package and lightdm is not
understanding policy messages.
-
- when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's not
true.
+ when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's
+ not true.
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected precise
** Description changed:
I've configured LDAP auth with sssd package and lightdm is not
understanding policy messages.
when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's
not true.
in /var/log/auth.log it
apport information
** Attachment added: modified.conffile..etc.pam.d.lightdm.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013/+attachment/3176214/+files/modified.conffile..etc.pam.d.lightdm.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013/+attachment/3176213/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013
to reproduce:
1 configure sssd with one LDAP domain
2 force some user password expiration changing 'shadowLastChange'
3 try to login with that user
result: user login is rejected and appears a message that says password
is incorrect
expected result: a message telling user that password is
this is my sssd.conf file:
[sssd]
config_file_version = 2
reconnection_retries = 3
sbus_timeout = 30
services = nss, pam
domains = XX.net
[nss]
filter_groups = root
filter_users = root
reconnection_retries = 3
[pam]
reconnection_retries = 3
[domain/XX.net]
; Using enumerate = true
Public bug reported:
# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04
# apt-cache policy xfce4-panel
xfce4-panel:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 4.8.6-2ubuntu2
Version table:
4.8.6-2ubuntu2 0
500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe i386
I see, sorry for the confusion.
I can see that there's another soft link in /usr/share/applications but
is pointing to an absolute path:
ubuntu-nvidia-settings.desktop - /etc/alternatives/i386-linux-
gnu_nvidia_desktop
maybe will be enough with changing relative to absolute paths to resolv
this bug also affects me.
is limited unity launcher to Type=Application by design?
I would like to create shortcuts to some URL but Type=URL don't work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
about 4 or 5 years ago I was trying to package cinelerra with the goal
of including it in official repos.
the problem was (and still is) about licensing. people of
http://www.heroinewarrior.com doesn't really help to resolve the
situation and the whole issue was stalled. that was the main reason
my toshiba satellite l735 is also affected by this bug.
i can't modify brightness and having always full brigth affects battery
life.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886820
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529696 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696
i can confirm this bug.
in plugins window i can see that brasero can see cdrdao but it says
version is too old so it stays greyed i can't be used.
--
does not create the image of audio CD
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openbox
openbox bypasses xdg autostart entries.
i've created a test entry in /etc/xdg/autostart
cat /etc/xdg/autostart/test.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Exec=/usr/local/bin/test.sh
Name=test
Comment=execute a test script
Terminal=false
.
--
^ ^
O O
(_ _)
muzzol(a)muzzol.com
jabber id: muzzol(a)jabber.dk
No atribueixis qualitats humanes als ordinadors.
No els hi agrada.
El gobierno español sólo habla con terroristas
.
--
^ ^
O O
(_ _)
muzzol(a)muzzol.com
jabber id: muzzol(a)jabber.dk
No atribueixis qualitats humanes als ordinadors.
No els hi agrada.
El gobierno español sólo habla con terroristas
which credentials will use this init script?
if it's root ones i think is a bad idea.
also, an init script for something userspace oriented is not really needed.
--
package doesn't provide init script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414189
You received this bug notification because you are a
i wrote a fusesmb.cache replacement.
you can try it alone and see the results in $HOME/.smb/fusesmb.cache
file
to truly replace fusesmb.cache just rename the original
mv -f /usr/bin/fusesmb.cache /usr/bin/fusesmb.cache.orig
and copy my script to /usr/bin/fusesmb.cache
it generates a log on
i can reproduce it in feisty also.
libnss introduces a change in its behaviour, now the file used is
/etc/libnss-ldap.secret
but ldapscripts are still looking for /etc/ldap.secret
a simple soft link solves de problem, maybe should be done by debconf
postscript.
Package: ldapscripts
Priority:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ldapscripts
steps to reproduce:
- install slapd
- install and configure ldapscripts
- execute _ldapinit
detailed info:
when you install slapd debconf creates two objects, root organization
and admin user:
dn: dc=nodomain
objectClass: top
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: udev
i can't find any reference to -d parameter in help or man:
==
# udevinfo -h
Usage: udevinfo [-anpqrVh]
-q TYPE query database for the specified value:
'name'name of device node
ok, thanks for the answer.
i didnt know that new features go to +specs, so i filled as a bug.
i'll do that.
muzzol
En/na Cody A.W. Somerville ha escrit:
Thanks for your report. Your idea might get more attention and have
the possibility of being implemented if you would submit
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: network-manager-gnome
is pretty usual to check what ip your computer have.
adding ip to tooltip rather than right clicking on Information will increase
usability.
** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status:
Public bug reported:
by now is dificult to identify distribution/version.
a file such as /etc/ubuntu-release or /etc/ubuntu-version with some info in it
should help scripts and admins to quickly identify actual version.
several distributions use this approach.
actually ubuntu uses
41 matches
Mail list logo
