This is still valid on all Ubuntu versions when ifupdown is used, and an
RA exists on the network - there is a race in assigning the default
gateway. See the associated Debian bug for additional details.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #805445
I have the packages in for testing, though repro may take some time to
occur organically. I also think it might be prudent to add a Restart
=on-failure directive to the systemd units regardless of whether the fix
for this issue is effective, so that future bugs don't take down users'
networks.
@radek-zajic I'm not running the patch currently, but I only saw that
crash while running with the patch. If I rebuild using the patch again
I'll grab a stack trace (I've just replaced the machine running DHCP).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Yes, the problem is certainly exacerbated by the service not having a
Restart parameter, but this needs some real attention. The quick-and-
dirty-patch does reduce the crashes, but results in a different crash
(albeit less frequently).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Tested kernel from xenial-proposed on an affected system, and the issue
there appears to be resolved.
$ uname -r
4.4.0-120-generic
$ apt policy linux-image-generic
linux-image-generic:
Installed: 4.4.0.120.126
Candidate: 4.4.0.120.126
Version table:
*** 4.4.0.120.126 400
400
There's also bug 1458323, that I suspect is not properly fixed without
moving to a later version, and updating pjsip, or a config hack to
disable the offending module (which is the officially supported core SIP
module).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
It would be nice if someone could make a definitive statement on which
path would be acceptable to fixing the current state of Asterisk on
Ubuntu LTS - the backports page says that backports should not be used
to fix bugs, but the comments here suggest that an SRU may not be
possible if people
Possible duplicate of #1042275
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1485316
Title:
dnsmasq breaks DNS, if not used as DNS server
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Confirming, nzbget-17.0+dfsg-1 is inexplicably being built against
GnuTLS again, so this bug is back.
** Changed in: nzbget (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Advertising commercial products/services in base-files really sucks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592386
Title:
[SRU] add links for obtaining management and support, fix
@racb would it be possible to get an SRU for this into 16.04 since the
change is purely packaging-related, and it would be nice if the LTS was
not broken in this way in perpetuity?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@athompso, seems to work fine here on 16.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249777
Title:
libsss-sudo generated nsswitch.conf leads to error messages upon sudo
invocation
To
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1458323 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458323
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1458323
Asterisk crashes with default install because of pjsip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I believe this may be a kernel regression. I can repro on 15.04 with
sddm by installing any 4.x series kernel, haven't done any bisecting,
and can't find anything interesting in dmesg (when I can switch to a vc
sucessfully after X starts but fails to output anything), but with a
single change
@penalvch: I'm not sure what useful information ubuntu-bug would include
for this particular issue - the 3.19 driver doesn't support the 8260
hardware is really all there is to it. I've also kind of had to
frankenstein things a little bit on this machine in the mean time, so
results not be
Is this still planned? I have a Skylake system that locks up frequently
on more recent kernels, but works with the combination of patches
included in the Vivid 3.19 kernel, however there I have no wireless...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Can we please get 1.8.48 released in Ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dbconfig-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520872
Title:
dbconfig-common: mysqldump must dump routines during upgrade, or
Can we please get 1.8.48 released in Ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520872
Title:
dbconfig-common: mysqldump must dump routines during upgrade, or risk
data loss
To manage
Public bug reported:
network-manager-openvpn (or some upstream component) is ignoring the
dhcp-option SEARCH parameter, which means that not only won't additional
domains get appended to search, but if 'Use only for resources on this
connection' is enabled, those domains will not get resolved via
My testing so far hasn't turned up any issues with 1.11.7, I'd be quite
pleased to see it land in -updates if you're happy with that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249777
Title:
So, the ipa-client-install script is fixed in 4.x so that it either
doesn't add sudoers to nsswitch.conf, or does enable sudo in sssd.conf?
I did indeed have problems finding rules using sssd-1.11.5-1ubuntu3
against FreeIPA server 4.1.2, I'm testing now using your
sssd-1.11.7-1~trusty1 packages
** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249777
Title:
Well, darn, I seem to have screwed up the status for the sudo package,
and now Launchpad won't let me change it back.
** No longer affects: sudo (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Sorry for the noise.
Working through this, it's probably a config issue. On joining a host
via freeipa-client-install, nsswitch.conf is updated to add sss to
sudoers, however sssd.conf is *not* created with services = sudo, so
every sudo call gets a hard error trying to look up the defaults
Patch resolves the issue for me locally
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371833
Title:
dhclient is unable to parse zero-length option values (breaks DHCPv6)
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04
isc-dhcp-client:
Installed: 4.2.4-7ubuntu12
Candidate: 4.2.4-7ubuntu12
Version table:
*** 4.2.4-7ubuntu12 0
500 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/ubuntu/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64
Packages
100
Please re-open - this is confirmed broken again in Trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936712
Title:
NetworkManager should put IPv6 DNS servers before IPv4 DNS servers in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1193205 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193205
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1193205
dhcp IPv6 sets accept_ra to 0 and doesn't get IPv6 route
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: kexec-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324125
Title:
Unable to trigger a kernel crash dump on laptop
To manage
Still a problem in 14.04.
** Tags added: trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052264
Title:
nfsd won't start unless exports has content
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #879633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879633
** Also affects: sudo (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879633
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Just blew two hours trying to work out why my certs were broken. They
weren't, but OpenSSL on Debian/Ubuntu is extremely stupid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396818
Title:
What appears to be happening is that when CApath is set to anything, it
will actually fall back to '${OPENSSLDIR}/certs' and succeed, if the
required cert hashes are not found at the CApath specified on the CLI.
But by default, only the CAfile codepath is activated, and the default
CAfile is set
Lucid also fails with '-vga qxl' without the patches, and qxl is the
default for newer spice-enabled kvm/virt-manager/etc stacks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717445
Title:
grub2
w00t, upstream actually merged this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531758
Title:
dput HTTP(S) auth fails with stack trace on 2.6.4-0ubuntu1 (karmic)
and 0.9.5.1ubuntu1 (lucid)
To
Where is the fix released?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169950
Title:
Installation from flash for ubuntu server 13.04 fails to mount CD/ISO
To manage notifications about this bug
Still in Raring/Saucy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531758
Title:
dput HTTP(S) auth fails with stack trace on 2.6.4-0ubuntu1 (karmic)
and 0.9.5.1ubuntu1 (lucid)
To manage
Or you can try:
backportpackage -u ppa:launchpaduser/launchpadrepo -s quantal -d precise
netcf
backportpackage -u ppa:launchpaduser/launchpadrepo -s quantal -d precise
libvirt
However that will only work if there are no specific dependencies on
other packages/versions that are only available
Reporter provided feedback and a fix, this bug is still evident on 12.04
at least, and the result of encountering it is pretty serious, since APT
won't function, and you either need to patch as explained here, or edit
debconf manually (since you can't turn off the KDE frontend using dpkg-
I don't see this fix being committed upstream, and as this is only
affecting Ubuntu's Python version, and is still (!) broken in current
releases, I'd really appreciate having this patched in Ubuntu so we
don't have to keep maintaining a local copy. Appears this is still
unpatched in all
Have verified patch still resolves the issue on Precise
(dput-0.9.6.2ubuntu1), can perform further verification on subsequent
releases if this has any hope of being merged.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@maciej-puzio - because this would require SRU validation, and due to
the nature of the changes, I suspect it would fail due to potential for
regressions. Additionally, netcf as a dependency would need to be
accepted into precise first, which hasn't happened at this stage (see
LP: #904014)
--
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052264
Title:
nfsd won't start unless exports has content
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Since the following change:
--- a/debian/nfs-kernel-server.init2012-09-18 11:03:38.389491693 +1000
+++ b/debian/nfs-kernel-server.init 2012-09-18 10:54:36.317492001 +1000
@@ -61,7 +61,13 @@
# See how we were called.
case $1 in
start)
- if [ -f
I can't see from the changelogs what this was meant to fix, but users
already have methods of disabling nfsd if they don't want it to start,
so this change in behaviour doesn't seem to be necessary, and breaks
expected behaviour.
I can see two ways of solving this, either by simply deleting the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052267
Title:
software-properties-common should depend on ca-certificates
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Installing software-properties-common on a bootstrapped/minimal system
does not install ca-certificates, which results in failures when using
apt-add-repository.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: software-properties-common 0.92.4
ProcVersionSignature:
On 01/09/12 09:53, Sparhawk wrote:
Also related is bug # 947638, a supposed duplicate, where rpcbind
complains about /run/rpcbind/* as opposed to /var/run/rpcbind/* (I get
that error instead).
The path changed between Oneiric and Precise, so they're essentially the
same error, unless you're
I had a feeling it might be related to the particular image used, which
is why my testing took a while - I tried a couple. Unfortunately, I
used an existing burnt CD from a folder here, so I can't be sure what
image it was generated from.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
powertop_2.0-0.2 in Quantal works. Unfortuantely the patch from the
Redhat bug is against 1.98, and it looks like there was some significant
between 1.97 and 1.98, so the patch is not easily applied to the current
Precise version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Really? Considering `rpcbind -w` is meant to do a warm start, based on
reading those files, having it warn when you tell it to do so and they
don't exist seems pretty fair to me. And it's a simple fix, with
minimal (no?) impact that doesn't require changing source code, or
trying to get upstream
+1 for the patch in #18, can we get a build and test done before
12.04.1?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835833
Title:
spurious syslog error because of use of -w on boot [rpcbind.xdr
I did a clean install in a VM last night and didn't reproduce. My
colleague misinterpreted his symptoms, and I believe his issue is only
related to #1003842. I'll have one more run at reproducing it in the
next few days, otherwise I'm baffled...
--
You received this bug notification because
I'll ask my colleagues to comment on cause for their lack of search
domains, which seems likely to be related, but I'm going to be
interstate for the next week, so an update may not be available until
then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@jdthood - what's required for this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000244
Title:
Network Manager does not populate resolv.conf
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
On 29/05/12 07:06, Thomas Hood wrote:
We aren't getting duplicates of #1000244 so it's probably not a
frequently occurring problem. If resolvconf were systematically
failing to create the resolv.conf symlink we'd be getting hundreds of
reports about it. Based on what we know now it's most
On 27/05/12 17:58, Simon Kelley wrote:
Executive summary: non-equivalent servers are bad, but --strict-order
will make things work, for the same value of work as the libc
resolver). Non-equivalent servers are bad, so don't encourage their
use by making --strict-order the default.
To be
On 28/05/12 08:05, Sergio Callegari wrote:
My idea for a heuristic was indeed extremely simple. In case the first
name server has a non public ip address, auto switch to strict order.
That may work in many scenarios, but not if the address happens to be
routable, and only until IPv6 is
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #671135
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671135
** Also affects: nvclock (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671135
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
@jdthood - I mentioned that resolv.conf was missing in #1000244, and
since it wasn't being populated correctly, so if it's not being
populated, and you disable dnsmasq, that would result in no
resolution...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@callegar - that's all well and good, and I agree, but this is unlikely
to get solved in dnsmasq (though that would be ideal).
@jdthood:
1. Would have been the sane option for an LTS release (and server installs
should use traditional resolv.conf model, if that's not the case)
2. Well,
@jdthood:
- /etc/resolv.conf did not exist in any form on a clean install, prior to
dpkg-reconfiguring resolvconf
- DNS resolution worked with the following caveats:
- search domains offered via DHCP were not honored
- random order nameserver querying and caching by dnsmasq results in
I believe this is related to the various other resolvconf issues.
Search domains are also not respected when assigned via DHCP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507098
Title:
search
Unfortunately I've now 'fixed' mine by disabling dnsmasq and
reconfiguring resolvconf, but this behaviour was exhibited on a clean
install for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000244
Short-term fix is to `dpkg-reconfigure resolvconf` and enable the option
to 'Prepare /etc/resolv.conf for dynamic updates' or whatever it says.
Then, `resolvconf --enable-updates` (the latter may not be needed).
Also, your search domain won't work if you're using the dnsmasq method
in
mythtv-setup will still segfault pretty frequently (quickly scrolling
lists for example seems to trigger it). Can provide additional
backtraces if useful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
libmyth-0.24-0-2:0.24.2+fixes.20120127.10d5624-0ubuntu0mythbuntu2
mythtv-backend-2:0.24.2+fixes.20120127.10d5624-0ubuntu0mythbuntu2
mythtv-backend-master-2:0.24.2+fixes.20120127.10d5624-0ubuntu0mythbuntu2
Full backtrace with relevant symbols.
** Attachment added:
Okay, this is a packaging problem - /usr/share/mythtv/i18n/mythfrontend*
needs to be split out from mythfrontend, put into a separate package,
and both mythtv-backend and mythtv-frontend then need to depend on it.
In the short term, installing mythtv-frontend allows mythtv-setup to
work.
--
You
Sorry for the message flood, scratch my last - having the i18n files
allows the language list to be populated, but segfault still evident.
Cancel language selection is the current workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868032 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868032
This is not a duplicate of bug #868032, though it is exacerbated by it.
This is about a lack of copy progress in the notification area, rather
than the copy dialog window skip flag.
--
You received this bug
@julo - They're separate bugs that exacerbate each other. If one
worked, the other would not be such a problem. That said, I've tried
building 3.2.1 with all Debian/Ubuntu patches removed, and I still get
no notification, so #849733 must either be an upstream bug (the linked
issue from bug
Thanks for the rapid fix guys, appreciated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868032
Title:
nautilus progress window marked skipped, not managed by gnome-shell
To manage notifications
I've compiled the nautilus-3.2 branch from Gnome git and still don't get
any notifications. I'll try building master, and if still no luck, I'll
do some debugging and try to find out why, and maybe go back to
upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Absolutely - this is absolutely ridiculous.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868032
Title:
nautilus progress window marked skipped, not managed by gnome-shell
To manage notifications
It's a confirmed issue set to low priority, but with medium impact - the
incongruence is what prompted the additional comments. Particularly
when the fix is simply to remove a completely unnecessary Ubuntu-
specific patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@didrocks - thanks for the explanation, I'll look at producing a patch
for this. I must admit, I didn't search the changelog, but commenting
the patches themselves (as Debian do) makes this round-trip a lot more
accessible and clear.
@seb128 - a quick post to say this patch was related to
A proposed solution is to simply backport hr_swrun.c from 5.4.4, tested
and problem resolved here using this patch.
** Patch added: hr_swrun-5.4.4-backport.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/517574/+attachment/2536023/+files/hr_swrun-5.4.4-backport.patch
--
You
A proposed solution is to simply backport hr_swrun.c from 5.4.4, tested
and problem resolved here using this patch.
** Patch added: hr_swrun-5.4.4-backport.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/517574/+attachment/2536023/+files/hr_swrun-5.4.4-backport.patch
--
You
I have verified that the lucid-proposed package resolves the problem
reported here, do not currently have access to a maverick install,
however will build and test if required.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in
I have verified that the lucid-proposed package resolves the problem
reported here, do not currently have access to a maverick install,
however will build and test if required.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 13/04/11 08:43, Jean Caringi wrote:
Sorry, but, what is the solution? I've installed 0.2.10-0ubuntu1, how
can I get 0.2.14 version?
It's only released in Natty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Working fine with 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9~ppa2 from your PPA.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748834
Title:
libvirt segfaults on networkIsActive or networkIsPersistent
--
Working fine with 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9~ppa2 from your PPA.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748834
Title:
libvirt segfaults on networkIsActive or networkIsPersistent
--
ubuntu-bugs
Sorry, I should have provided a test-case - I'm not sure those upstream
bugs are related. To reproduce, simply call either either
networkIsActive or networkIsPersistent from the libvirt library...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
On 05/04/11 09:41, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Success.
@pdf, could you please try the version of libvirt-bin at ppa:serge-
hallyn/virt? If that works for you, I'll go ahead and request an SRU.
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
Will test later today
Nominating for SRU:
The moving of core system daemons (ie - mysql, libvirt-bin, etc) to
Upstart without the means for non-destructive disabling impairs the
ability to use those services on servers, particularly in clustered
environments. This is a regression.
The addition of the 'manual'
Assuming I don't have permission to set the appropriate flags here -
can't see the options described in the SRU document.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94065
Title:
init: add
Sorry, I should have provided a test-case - I'm not sure those upstream
bugs are related. To reproduce, simply call either either
networkIsActive or networkIsPersistent from the libvirt library...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
On 05/04/11 09:41, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Success.
@pdf, could you please try the version of libvirt-bin at ppa:serge-
hallyn/virt? If that works for you, I'll go ahead and request an SRU.
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
Will test later today
On 05/04/11 05:04, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm not totally against this for SRU, but I would like to make sure we are
sure that it is entirely necessary before going forward.
Understood.
First, I would like to refute the statement that it is impossible.
This can be achieved on a script-specific
On 04/04/11 02:31, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Thanks very much for the bug posting and pointing to the fix. I'll
reproduce, test, and SRU the fix.
Great, thanks for the quick response Serge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
On 04/04/11 02:31, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Thanks very much for the bug posting and pointing to the fix. I'll
reproduce, test, and SRU the fix.
Great, thanks for the quick response Serge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Known bug, fixed upstream but still evident in Lucid.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.34~lucid1-server 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-server x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zcommon
** Attachment added: Backtrace, etc...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748834/+attachment/1971395/+files/gdb-libvirtd.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748834
Upstream fix is here:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=6d4bd59cf82d96531abe1527bc80caa2ba86249e;hp=bf6789d913a5edb029af8fe959c0d54ede2a2719#patch1
Attached patch against Lucid 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9 package.
** Patch added: Patch for libvirt-0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9
Public bug reported:
Known bug, fixed upstream but still evident in Lucid.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.34~lucid1-server 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-server x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zcommon
** Attachment added: Backtrace, etc...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748834/+attachment/1971395/+files/gdb-libvirtd.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748834
Title:
libvirt
Upstream fix is here:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=6d4bd59cf82d96531abe1527bc80caa2ba86249e;hp=bf6789d913a5edb029af8fe959c0d54ede2a2719#patch1
Attached patch against Lucid 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9 package.
** Patch added: Patch for libvirt-0.7.5-5ubuntu27.9
98 matches
Mail list logo
