I filed this upstream as well: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794904
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #794904
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794904
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
The Merb project ceased in 2011, and became the basis for Rails 3. The
website merbivore.com is now a domain squatter link farm.
The package ruby-merb-core first appears as
http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/ruby-merb-core and is still available
in the wily repos.
This
Could you describe your symptoms more specifically to make sure that you
actually have _this_ bug?
Per my comment #1, do you see the same issue here (and can you post your
output):
With no other major CPU usage, but CPU 0 pegged, perf top shows this as the
top usage:
50.02% [kernel] [k]
This bug was fixed in upstream Linux and backported to the following
Ubuntu linux kernel package revisions:
3.2.0-61
3.5.0-49
3.8.0-39
3.11.0-20
The fix was picked up in the upstream 3.13 tree in March, 2014:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg37786.html
If you are running a version of the
Link to SRU proposal: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-
defaults/+bug/1315143
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292
Title:
installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby
+1 for fixing this as a Trusty SRU. Keeping it broken for the next two
years is completely ridiculous. Please PLEASE fix the ruby2.0 dependency
error on Trusty.
The least-surprising thing to do is to change the package dependency
error so that installing ruby2.0 does not pull in ruby1.9.1. People
Could you test this again with 3.11.0-20 and report back if the problem
persists or has been resolved?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261744
Title:
Ubuntu 13.10 x64 kernel
Andrew, have you tested the 3.2.0-61 kernel from the proposed channel?
These types of bugfix releases can often be helped along with test
result comments of the form: I tried the proposed package and it
resolves this problem for me. Hope it is published soon. (or not if it
doesn't, which is the
Note: the 'Package-testing' step is still listed as In Progress. I
imagine it can be Fix Released now :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300455
Title:
linux: 3.2.0-61.92 -proposed
Also Fix Released for linux-lts-saucy by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-saucy/+bug/1301505 -
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb
Testing 3.11.0-20~precise1 and this issue appears to be resolved. Thank
you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb driver infinite loop in ksoftirqd, uses 100% of
linux-3.2.0-61 is NOT released, I don't understand why it's been marked
Fix Released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb driver infinite loop in ksoftirqd, uses
Bug 1300455 has the fixed linux kernel for Precise (3.2.0-61)
Bug 1300928 has the fixed linux kernel for Saucy (3.11.0-20)
Bug 1301505 has the fixes backport linux-lts-saucy for Precise
(3.11.0-20~precise)
None of the kernels above have been released, so this bug cannot be
closed yet.
I don't
Bug 1300928 has the fixed linux kernel for Saucy.
Bug 1301505 has the fixes backport linux-lts-saucy for Precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb driver
Precise kernel package linux-3.2.0-61 is not released yet:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1300455
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb driver
Tim, could you add an Also affects section for linux-lts-saucy? That
fix has not been released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb driver infinite loop in
This is resolved by 3.11.0-17.
The kernel fix has title vfs: fix subtle use-after-free of
pipe_inode_info
See this LKML post for details:
http://lwn.net/Articles/575477/
Subject: Re: Found it! (was Re: [3.10] Oopses in kmem_cache_allocate() via
prepare_creds())
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 18:58:57
Thank you! Testing the two kernels above:
3.2.0-61.92 does not exhibit the issue.
3.11.10.6 does not exhibit the issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Title:
Intel igb driver
(Hmm, you're simply tracking 3.2.55, that's how the net_dma commit got
into the 3.2.0-60 build. Do we have to wait for 3.2.56 for a fix to be
shipped in an Ubuntu build?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hey, so heads up that this absolutely does affect kernel 3.2.0-60.
Per the changelog here:
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux/linux_3.2.0-60.91/changelog
This commit was added:
* net_dma: mark broken
- LP: #1281620
According to the commit message for ioat: fix
I am now seeing this bug with the Precise linux-3.2.0-60 package on the
same hardware.
I will try to create a lab-conditions reproduction of the issue to test
the 3.11.10.6 kernel, but so far the problem only manifests on my
production workload and/or production hardware.
--
You received this
Luis, I see the commit will be in 3.11.10.6. Thank you!
http://ubuntu.5.x6.nabble.com/3-11-y-z-extended-stable-Linux-3-11-10-6-td5060198.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Changing from package linux-lts-saucy to linux; this impacts the 3.11
kernel in general, not just the Precise build.
** Package changed: linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Does not require logs, this is a known issue upstream. Changing to
Confirmed.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291113
Public bug reported:
This bug is present in 3.11.0-17 and 3.11.0-18:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/19/658
The afflicted network interface's lspci output:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection
(rev 01)
Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Device
I emailed Dan Williams, igb driver maintainer, and he pointed me at this
commit. Said it had not been picked up in the 3.11 tree to his
knowledge, but was in other 3.1x trees:
With no other major CPU usage, but CPU 0 pegged, perf top shows this
as the top usage:
50.02% [kernel] [k] tasklet_action
23.48% [kernel] [k] __do_softirq
5.66% [kernel] [k] __raise_softirq_irqoff
--
You received this bug notification because
Cannot run this tool. How shall I gather the relevant logs in a non-
desktop scenario?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285427
Title:
Precise with linux-lts-saucy 3.11.0-15 soft
I am currently testing 3.11.0-17 to see if it resolves the problem, but
while I do that test, I want to document the problem!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285427
Title:
Precise
[6448078.086457] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#23 stuck for 22s! [ruby:19536]s data
and manage this system at https://landscape.canonical.com/
[6448078.093543] Modules linked in: btrfs(F) zlib_deflate(F) ufs(F) qnx4(F)
hfsplus(F) hfs(F) minix(F) ntfs(F) msdos(F) jfs(F) xfs(F) reiserfs(F) ext2(F)
[1134528.181180] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 881152a62a80
[1134528.189210] IP: [8119c316] kmem_cache_alloc+0x66/0x150
[1134528.196162] PGD 1fd9067 PUD 0
[1134528.199831] Oops: [#1] SMP
[1134528.203695] Modules linked in: btrfs(F) zlib_deflate(F) ufs(F) qnx4(F)
Public bug reported:
I am experiencing intermittent soft lockups with kernels linux-lts-saucy
3.11.0-13 and linux-lts-saucy 3.11.0-15. I am currently testing
3.11.0-17 to see if it resolves the problem, but while I do that test, I
want to document the problem!
Symptoms: host can be pinged, but
Cannot run this tool. What logs shall I get you?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285427
Title:
Precise with linux-lts-saucy 3.11.0-15 soft lockup
To manage notifications about this
Will there be packages built for Lucid, Oneiric, and Precise that are
within their support windows?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160893
Title:
Unchecked access to SpiderMonkey’s
Nuts. What a bummer it didn't make 12.04. Is there an easy way I can
list out the rev-deps to get an idea for the scope of this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156
Nuts. What a bummer it didn't make 12.04. Is there an easy way I can
list out the rev-deps to get an idea for the scope of this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156
Title:
Please
+1 for PHP 5.4 in precise-backports. Does that require a new bug to be
filed to keep track of?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156
Title:
Please merge PHP 5.4 from
+1 for PHP 5.4 in precise-backports. Does that require a new bug to be
filed to keep track of?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156
Title:
Please merge PHP 5.4 from Debian
To
38 matches
Mail list logo
