This is opinion that you need to convince upstream to address.
Upstream development is dead, so you can be the person to implement it.
** Changed in: gosmore (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: gosmore (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055135
Title:
gosmore needs to work better on first run
To manage notifications
** Changed in: gosmore (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055135
Title:
gosmore needs to work better on first run
To manage notifications
Hamish, thank you for your comment. Yes, the dataset is huge, see my
original report. But the user experience can still be improved a lot
from the status quo. I gave examples in my original report as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gosmore (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055135
Title:
** Description changed:
The user experience on first run for gosmore is terrible. bzip2 -d
planet-...osm.bz2 | gosmore rebuild Excuse me? The package should
probably download the osm file on its own and compile it. Maybe the
user should be warned about the requirements in bandwidth,
The entire dataset is huge, many GB. And it's constantly changing. (see
the cloudmade per-country weekly/monthly extracts)
So the user will always have to download their local subset and
compile it as needed.
Hamish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
