On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:55:31 -, Hans Joachim Desserud wrote:
Depending on what else the Unity-support contains, I guess it would be
easy to disable the patch to bring it back if wanted. That would create
an Ubuntu-delta though, which would require more work to get newer
releases from
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:36:42 -, Hans Joachim Desserud wrote:
Before I do that, I wanted to check what happened with the Unity-related
patch. There seems to still be a mrDlib_jayatana.patch, so I guess some
parts ended up being patched out in Debian. I only skimmed it, but I'm
not quite
Hi gregor
Thanks for your quick reply.
Depending on what else the Unity-support contains, I guess it would be
easy to disable the patch to bring it back if wanted. That would create
an Ubuntu-delta though, which would require more work to get newer
releases from Debian.
The would only work
Hi all.
From what I can see 2.10 has been packaged and is available in the
latest Ubuntu releases. (Only beta version in Ubuntu 14.04, but the
other ones look like stable releases) So I guess that means this bug can
be closed.
Before I do that, I wanted to check what happened with the
That' unfortunate... Is there a technical reason for patching out the unity
support?
joke otherwise we just have to port unity to debian /joke
Greetings
Stefan
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:05:04 -, zarquon42 wrote:
That' unfortunate... Is there a technical reason for patching out the
unity support?
Several necessary libraries are not available in Debian, e.g.
jayatana (but also jersey etc.).
joke otherwise we just have to port unity to debian /joke
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: jabref (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126510
Title:
Would probably require the debian package to be upgraded first though.
Are there significant changes between 2.9 beta2 and 2.9.2 that would
justify the update ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
in 2.9.2, global menu works under unity, while it does not in 2.9 - I
also presumed that a release would prefer stable versions over betas.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126510
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:53:20 -, zarquon42 wrote:
in 2.9.2, global menu works under unity, while it does not in 2.9 - I
also presumed that a release would prefer stable versions over betas.
(I'm the maintainer of JabRef in Debian.)
Good news: We already have 2.9.2 almost ready in git,
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126510
Title:
Please update raring version to jabref-2.9.2 stable
To manage notifications about this bug go
11 matches
Mail list logo
