mplayerplug-in (3.50-1ubuntu2) hardy; urgency=low
* Added support for Firefox 3 xulrunner plugin architecture by linking
plugins to /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins. (LP: #193812)
- updated debian/mozilla-mplayer.links
-- Jared Greenwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Mar 2008
09:49:19
May I add that you guys don't forget konqueror-kde4 in the depends?
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Swiftweasel comes in several flavors (e.g. swiftweasel-prescott), but I think
we could persuade the author to supply a provides.
And don't forget swiftfox - which comes in several flavours and provides
www-browser.
Package: swiftfox-prescott
Version: 3.0pre-2
Section: web
Priority: optional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jojo4u wrote:
| Swiftweasel comes in several flavors (e.g. swiftweasel-prescott), but
I think we could persuade the author to supply a provides.
| And don't forget swiftfox - which comes in several flavours and
provides www-browser.
|
| Package:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saša Bodiroža wrote:
| On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM, John Vivirito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I dont see any reason why mplayer(standalone app) should depend on
| xulrunner nor browsers since it doesnt need them i think we should
| downgrade all
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:45 PM, John Vivirito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more i think about this the more i am against adding browsers to the
deps, only because if they are using non-gecko browser they will have to
install one.(yes i know thats the point as mozilla-mplyer wont work on
Hi Saša,
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:14:58PM -, Saša Bodiroža wrote:
I'm thinking on any browser that can make use of mozilla-mplayer. But,
as I said before, that situation is very rare. There are not that many
browsers out there, which would be added, so the previous example is
not that
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Forest Bond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You keep saying this, but it's already happened *twice*. Once with xulrunner,
and again now. Why can't we just make it Recommends so we don't have to
revisit it again?
That brings another problem. If the user decides to
I use swiftweasel and in order to keep firefox from my disk, I have to
modify the dependencies. Please do not depend on any browser if this is
possible. Or depend on some virtual packet.
Package: swiftweasel-prescott
Essential: no
Priority: optional
Section: web
Maintainer: stickk [EMAIL
I dont see any reason why mplayer(standalone app) should depend on
xulrunner nor browsers since it doesnt need them i think we should
downgrade all browser deps and xulrunner depsto recommends
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You
i think we might consider to move the browser depends to recommends
instead.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM, John Vivirito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont see any reason why mplayer(standalone app) should depend on
xulrunner nor browsers since it doesnt need them i think we should
downgrade all browser deps and xulrunner depsto recommends
mplayer doesn't depend on any
Does this bug can be been resolved by Bug #193812?
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Nicolas Valcárcel (nxvl)
Status: Incomplete = In Progress
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I don't think they have xulrunner-1.9 in debian, so lets wait for this and see
what we get.
Just in case, asac told me that they are planning to use
/usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/ for xulrunner(-1.9) plugins. Its not yet
fixed, so we may have to wait for that as well.
Merge is uploaded
Thanks, i will consider that for the changelog next time :D
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Forest, can you provide us with a xulrunner app where we can test it?
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
He also say it work fine without copying to any links for xulrunner or
xulrunner-1.9, so i will test it with some help of Forest
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I have talk to Ari Pollak, the Debian Maintainer, and he told me he will
add those features in the next upstream release, which will be any day
from now on, do we wait for it or make that patch anyway?
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
Ok, so as Ari Pollak said he will patch this bug on the next release,
which will be released any day from now on, i decided to wait, and only
do the merge.
** Attachment added: mplayerplug-in_3.45-1ubuntu1.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10263716/mplayerplug-in_3.45-1ubuntu1.debdiff
**
I have talk to asac and fujitsu and both have answer they have no
fixings for this new version, so this is the only one to do with the
merge.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a
Then prepare a new merge with the agreed changes. Take into consideration that
you should add appropriate links for the plugin dirs of xulrunner and
xulrunner-1.9.
Please subscribe u-u-s when ready for upload.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
Nicolas,
can you coordinate this with asac and/or fujitsu?
There could be also additional bugs they may want to fix with this update.
Thanks.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a
What would you like me to do to prove that mozilla-mplayer works with
xulrunner?
I'm sorry, but I don't have time to test gnome-mplayer or gecko-
mediaplayer.
-Forest
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug
I have talk to upstream developer, and he answer to me and norsetto, we
are now sure it work, thanks anyway.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Personally, I don't think that www browsers should be made recommendations and
not dependencies.
Let me quote the debian policy:
The Depends field should be used if the depended-on package is required
for the depending package to provide a significant amount of
functionality.
While:
The
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:47:24AM -, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
Personally, I don't think that www browsers should be made recommendations and
not dependencies.
Let me quote the debian policy:
The Depends field should be used if the depended-on package is required
for the depending
So it can be added as Dependency with another |, so it's or a gecko browser
or xulrunner
On 10/29/07, Forest Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:47:24AM -, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
Personally, I don't think that www browsers should be made
recommendations and
I still would like to see some evidence.
If you can't do it yourself, you can also ask upstream, he is usually very
responsive.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:33:12PM -, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
I still would like to see some evidence.
If you can't do it yourself, you can also ask upstream, he is usually very
responsive.
Evidence of xulrunner/mozilla-mplayer compatibility? As I said, I have a
working application
Yes, that would be good.
It would also be cool if you could check with gnome-mplayer and
gecko-mediaplayer, but the latter is not yet available in gutsy (actually, its
not yet available in hardy too, but its just a matter of days).
I would really appreciate it.
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily
I think it should be downgraded to recommendation, because installing
both it's an absurd, working on it.
** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Nicolas Valcárcel (nxvl)
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
Merged from debian (version 3.45-1), downgraded to recommend and added
xulrunner to recommend.
** Attachment added: mplayerplug-in_3.45-1ubuntu1.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10202518/mplayerplug-in_3.45-1ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Nicolas
** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
Status: New = Confirmed
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
** Tags added: packaging
--
mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
35 matches
Mail list logo
