this bug report seems to be no more active and actually looks like apt-
torrent is not really the best choice for Ubuntu. Therefore I'm changing
bug status to invalid. Feel free to re-open if anyone have some other
news about this or simply have a valid rationale to have apt-torrent
packaged into k
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/106382 Watch this and compare
which one is better. Debtorrent works allready for ubuntu. For apt-
torrent we need a repository where every package is a torrent. In the
debtorrent solution torrent-creation is much easier I think.
--
[needs-packaging] apt-tor
Did anyone get around to checking out the updated code?
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Sameer, your idea seems to be nice plus we have a working upstream
behind us that can provide any fix we may require to make it working in
Ubuntu the best way possible. I'll try this package tomorrow, so I can
give my first feedback about it, anyway thanks for your work both arnaud
and kristian.
-
The author (Arnaud Kyheng) mentions that the original goal of the
package was to deal with large packages. I would go beyond that though,
to simply see this as a network alleviation approach to the burst of
traffic that Ubuntu mirrors would see in October and April.
Considering that torrent will s
Arnaud Kyheng
to me, Andrea
show details
10:46 am (1½ hours ago)
Hi Kristian,
The main purpose of apt-torrent is to provide a new efficient way to get
open-source software. The target is to be more efficient, for users to
get really large packages, but also for server
Please let me know if you have any questions as the author has taken the
initiative and fixed up the package for us :-) I will get back to him
if you can provide some feedback...
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this bug notification because yo
we need upstream to modify this a bit before starting with packaging it.
Kristian, can you please contact the original author by mail, ccing me
as well?
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
On 10/21/07, Andrea Veri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it would be nice to receive some feedback from someone who tried using
> it on Ubuntu. If the only supported distro is Debian Sid, we just don't
> package this for Ubuntu. Kristian, what do you think?
Cameron might be right, but even if the top
it would be nice to receive some feedback from someone who tried using
it on Ubuntu. If the only supported distro is Debian Sid, we just don't
package this for Ubuntu. Kristian, what do you think?
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this bug notifi
Has anyone actually used this successfully with Ubuntu. From reading the
web site it seems like it will only work with Debian, and then only with
unstable. For example, from the FAQ:
Q: What are the current packages available ?
A: At the moment, with the default testing configuration, the 100 larg
On 10/20/07, Andrea Veri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Do you want to take care about having apt-torrent well packaged
> and ready for hardy? it would be nice to have a page on REVU for this so
> I can start reviewing it a bit. If not interested in packaging it
> yourself, just let me know s
Agreed. Do you want to take care about having apt-torrent well packaged
and ready for hardy? it would be nice to have a page on REVU for this so
I can start reviewing it a bit. If not interested in packaging it
yourself, just let me know so I can move on doing it.
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
On 10/19/07, Andrea Veri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we cannot sync files from an unofficial repository or website, but if
> you wish we can take it as an example to start with for packaging apt-
> torrent for the next Ubuntu's release: Hardy. What do you think?
I think it is a great idea. The p
we cannot sync files from an unofficial repository or website, but if
you wish we can take it as an example to start with for packaging apt-
torrent for the next Ubuntu's release: Hardy. What do you think?
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this b
In the official site ( http://sianka.free.fr/spip.php?rubrique3 ) there is a
.deb,
can we make a simple sync from this?
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
In the official site (http://sianka.free.fr/spip.php?rubrique3) there is a
.deb,
can we make a simple sync from this?
2007/10/18, Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>Status: New => Confirmed
>
> --
> [needs-packaging] apt
** Changed in: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] apt-torrent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153752
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
18 matches
Mail list logo
