[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-01-19 Thread bugproxy
if [ -n "${NR_2M_PAGES}" -a -z "$(get_hugetlbfs_mountpoint '2M')" ]; then +if [ -n "${NR_16M_PAGES}" -a -z "$(get_hugetlbfs_mountpoint '16M')" ]; then if [ -n "${NR_1G_PAGES}" -a -z "$(get_hugetlbfs_mountpoint '1G')" ]; then -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From prad...@us.ibm.com 2016-09-26 10:25 EDT--- Great, thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775 Title: Enable ppc64el on dpdk To manage notifications

Re: [Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-13 Thread ChristianEhrhardt
Hi, just to confirm - I understand those are upstream patches to dpdk that got in past dpdk 16.07 right, but you'd want those in the ppa and later in Ubuntu 17.04 right? In regard to the process, tor now and the near future future I think the process should be that you try to create patches on

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com 2016-09-13 10:58 EDT--- Thanks Christian for the update. We have got our platform enabled now to include missing libs like lpm, acl and others as well. These are essential for applications relying on them including some of sample applications in

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From prad...@us.ibm.com 2016-09-09 23:55 EDT--- Your hesitation is understandable. The level of support expected is probably different in our individual perceptions. I would also like to clear up a few things because there maybe some miscommunication. The first step in

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From prad...@us.ibm.com 2016-09-08 21:05 EDT--- (In reply to comment #33) A big thank you for your help with in moving this forward. Appreciate all the effort that has gone into it. Hopefully I can answer several of your questions and alleviate your concerns. First let me

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com 2016-09-07 05:49 EDT--- Thank you Christian. I have verified your dev07 deb for dpdk using testpmd on top of virtio pmd for packet forwarding sanity. test@ubu1610-0830:~$ sudo testpmd -c 0xf -d

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com 2016-09-02 07:14 EDT--- I downloaded your PPA source to check debian/control if supported arch included for librte-pmd-xenvirt1 as I proposed. The change was there. librte-pmd-xenvirt1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 arm64 i386], But then, as I

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com 2016-09-02 06:28 EDT--- Thanks. Strangely, I am seeing xenvirt1 pmd still a dependent lib for libdpdk-dev. $ sudo apt-get install libdpdk-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-09-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com 2016-09-01 23:10 EDT--- Regarding build error reported for ppc64el as in dev03 and dev 04 builds: https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/deb-dpdk-16.07 Removing "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BOND=n" from config/

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-08-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From prad...@us.ibm.com 2016-08-29 17:42 EDT--- A few clarifications that I would like to add for Ubuntu 16.10 : -support for DPDK (on Power) will be in conjunction with MLNX_OFED -It will be Tech Preview only -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1539775] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From ferse...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-05 06:26 EDT--- Hello. I have downloaded the source from Christian's dpdk from ppa, built and installed it from [1]. Just tried to run a dpdk_proc_info and got the following: # dpdk_proc_info EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0 EAL: