[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-09-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package shim-signed - 1.18~12.04.1 --- shim-signed (1.18~12.04.1) precise; urgency=medium * update-secureboot-policy: If /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled is present, prefer this unconditionally over MokSBStateRT. LP: #1604873. -- Steve Langasek

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package shim-signed - 1.18~15.10.1 --- shim-signed (1.18~15.10.1) wily; urgency=medium * update-secureboot-policy: If /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled is present, prefer this unconditionally over MokSBStateRT. LP: #1604873. -- Steve Langasek W

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package shim-signed - 1.18~14.04.1 --- shim-signed (1.18~14.04.1) trusty; urgency=medium * update-secureboot-policy: If /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled is present, prefer this unconditionally over MokSBStateRT. LP: #1604873. -- Steve Langasek

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package shim-signed - 1.18~16.04.1 --- shim-signed (1.18~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium * update-secureboot-policy: If /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled is present, prefer this unconditionally over MokSBStateRT. LP: #1604873. -- Steve Langasek

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-27 Thread Taihsiang Ho
I could not reproduce the test case on 201508-18805 - Dell XPS 13 9350 - Dino 2 SKL with Ubuntu 12.04.5. Both of the step5 and step7 did not prompt. I collected the log as the attachment 201508-18805-12.04.5.tar.gz, which was collected right after the step7. ** Attachment added: "201508-18805-12

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-27 Thread Taihsiang Ho
tested on 201508-18805 - Dell XPS 13 9350 - Dino 2 SKL with 14.04.4. I could reproduce the test case, except that the step2 and the step8 would get "permission denied" and "operation not permitted" respectively. There is no prompt at step5 and there is prompt at step7. -- You received this bug n

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-26 Thread Taihsiang Ho
More comments for the comment#44 and #45: Finally I could reproduce the issue "the secure boot wizard did not prompt during system dist-upgrade via GUI software updater" Steps: 1. Disable Secure Boot from BIOS settings. 2. Use dell-bto-xenial-xenial-master-X17-iso-20160713-0.iso to install the s

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-26 Thread Taihsiang Ho
comment #7 is typo. pasted to wrong bug report. please ignore it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604873 Title: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-26 Thread Taihsiang Ho
tested on 201508-18805 - Dell XPS 13 9350 - Dino 2 SKL with Xenial. I could reproduce the test case, except that the step2 and the step8 would get "permission denied" and "operation not permitted" respectively. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-26 Thread Shih-Yuan Lee
** Tags removed: verification-needed-precise ** Tags added: verification-done-precise ** Tags removed: verification-done-precise verification-done-trusty verification-done-wily verification-done-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-25 Thread Shih-Yuan Lee
** Tags removed: verification-needed-wily ** Tags added: verification-done-wily -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604873 Title: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbs

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-25 Thread Shih-Yuan Lee
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604873 Title: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/mo

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-22 Thread Shih-Yuan Lee
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-needed-precise verification-needed-wily verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-21 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Undecided => High

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-21 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected, Accepted shim-signed into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim- signed/1.18~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See htt

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed: [SRU Justification] In some cases, incorrect locally-set EFI variables can prevent the shim-signed package from detecting that SecureBoot is active on the system. As a result, the user will not be prompted to disable SecureBoot, and will be left with non-functional

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed: + [SRU Justification] + In some cases, incorrect locally-set EFI variables can prevent the shim-signed package from detecting that SecureBoot is active on the system. As a result, the user will not be prompted to disable SecureBoot, and will be left with non-functional

[Bug 1604873] Re: MokSBStateRT strictly inferior to /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled

2016-07-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package shim-signed - 1.18 --- shim-signed (1.18) yakkety; urgency=medium * update-secureboot-policy: If /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled is present, prefer this unconditionally over MokSBStateRT. LP: #1604873. -- Steve Langasek Wed, 20 Jul 20