>Anyway, the reason I'm here now is to confirm that update-manager just
now offered the non-security updates from two days ago, so it's working
as designed.
Thanks for the update arQon, closing as "Invalid" as update-manager is
working as designed.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
> We'll eventually add phased updates to APT too, but we're not there
yet.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to go out of your way to make it
impossible for users to get the current version of a package by any
means. The update-manager behavior is defensible, and even sensible; but
there's enormous
Marking the bug as incomplete, so it auto-closes eventually if there's
no update. That should give sufficient time to see if all machines
upgraded eventually.
We'll eventually add phased updates to APT too, but we're not there yet.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
Thanks for the link. It's a bit hard to defend it as "not technically a
bug, because we're *deliberately* ignoring what you said to do", but I
do understand the position (and even mostly agree with it, for what
that's worth).
It's very confusing when you have multiple machines though, with some
You seem to be describing Phased Updates:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PhasedUpdates
If so, you're seeing a feature of the Update
Manager and not a bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
