** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and syste
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-ddstreet
** Tags added: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To man
This bug was fixed in the package rabbitmq-server -
3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04.4
---
rabbitmq-server (3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04.4) xenial; urgency=medium
* d/rabbitmq-server.service:
- add TimeoutStartSec, Restart, RestartSec parameters (LP: #1874075)
rabbitmq-server (3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04
This bug was fixed in the package rabbitmq-server - 3.6.10-1ubuntu0.3
---
rabbitmq-server (3.6.10-1ubuntu0.3) bionic; urgency=medium
* d/rabbitmq-server.service:
- add TimeoutStartSec, Restart, RestartSec parameters (LP: #1874075)
rabbitmq-server (3.6.10-1ubuntu0.2) bionic; urg
Performing verification for rabbitmq-server in -proposed for xenial.
I installed 3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04.4 from -proposed, and followed the
instructions I wrote in comment #59.
I sent a message to host 1, checked that host 1 was master, and host 2
was the slave. I shut host 1 down, and then sent a m
Performing verification for rabbitmq-server in -proposed for bionic.
I installed 3.6.10-1ubuntu0.3 from -proposed, and followed the
instructions I wrote in comment #59.
I sent a message to host 1, checked that host 1 was master, and host 2
was the slave. I shut host 1 down, and then sent a messag
Performing verification for rabbitmq-server in -proposed for focal.
I know the focal package is released to -updates, but I will verify
again regardless.
I installed 3.8.2-0ubuntu1.1 from -proposed, and followed the
instructions I wrote in comment #59.
I sent a message to host 1, checked that ho
This bug was fixed in the package rabbitmq-server - 3.8.2-0ubuntu1.1
---
rabbitmq-server (3.8.2-0ubuntu1.1) focal; urgency=medium
* Fix timeout discrepancy between SysV and systemd (LP: #1874075)
upstream, rabbitmq-server-release - 694540270c8
* d/rabbitmq-server.init
- Ad
marking verification-done-focal as i mentioned in comment 71
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Ti
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/386905
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabb
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rabbitmq-server into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-
server/3.6.10-1ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Thanks @nicolasbock @mruffell! I think the latest changes make sense
and I think the shorter wait time in Xenial is ok, as systemd should
continue to restart it until it's successful.
I rebased @mruffell's debdiffs on the -proposed versions, and added a
short changelog entry, and uploaded to x/b.
@mruffel, I can also confirm that the xenial package is working.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To man
@mruffel, I can confirm that the bionic package from your PPA is
working.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and system
Okay, I made test packages for Bionic and Xenial based on the above:
The ppa is available here:
https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/lp1874075-test
It contains (based off of -updates):
Xenial:
rabbitmq-server 3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04.2+lp1874075v20200629b1
Bionic:
rabbitmq-server
I agree that the fixes in -proposed for Focal and Groovy are good as is,
since it works nicely with type=notify on those systems.
I spent some time testing on Bionic. I can confirm that the existence of
ExecStartPost is for the very reason that Nicolas describes, that
RabbitMQ will return 0 regard
On bionic the rabbitmq-server process returns with exit code 0
regardless of whether it managed to start the server or not.
Presumably this behavior is the reason for the ExecStartPost. If I
change the service to type notify then systemd notices that the
ExecStart command fails to start and the Exe
> In addition I am uncertain why the service doesn't use
> `Type=notify` as in the later versions. Rabbitmq-server-3.6.10
> understands what `sd_notify` is and I would have thought that this
> implies that we should be able to use `Type=notify` on Bionic
our goal is to make the version in Bionic w
> I guess this all means that 1) the version in focal-proposed is
> correct, and 2) the xenial and bionic versions need the addition of
> TimeoutStartSec=600 and Restart=on-failure to their service file,
> right? Is that all that's needed?
I agree with your assessment regarding Focal and Groovy. H
> In the context of the issues we are seeing with charms the 10 minute
> timeout should be sufficient.
right, but this isn't just changing rabbitmq-server used by charms, this
is changing the behavior for *all* Ubuntu users of rabbitmq-server, as
well as upstream. Since upstream did accept it, my
@mruffell thanks! Only a few comments below:
> > Note because of this bug, groovy and upstream has now been changed
> > to 10 min timeout, down from 1hr.
>
> We should decide if this is really what we want to do. And if it
> should revert to the longer 1hr timeout, propose that upstream.
>
> I don
@mruffell thanks! Only a few comments below:
> Note because of this bug, groovy and upstream has now been changed to
10 min timeout, down from 1hr.
We should decide if this is really what we want to do. And if it should
revert to the longer 1hr timeout, propose that upstream.
I don't really kn
What happens (packages from -updates):
On Groovy: Assuming same behaviour as focal due to systemd service file.
Untested.
On Focal: The rabbitmq service will start, and stay in 'activating' mode
until the daemon notifies systemd that it has started up (type=notify).
Every 300 seconds / 5 minutes
@ddstreet asked me to take a look.
Step-by-step reproducer:
Set up a 2 node rabbitmq cluster using virtual machines.
Make the hostnames rabbitmq1 and rabbitmq2.
Add each host to /etc/hosts in each vm.
Create the cluster:
1) On both hosts: sudo apt install rabbitmq-server
2) On host 1, copy the
@sil2100, last time I talked to @nicolasbock he was unclear on why it
was failing in bionic and passing in focal. I think probably the best
thing to do at this point is reject the versions in -proposed for x/b/f,
or just leave them in -proposed indefinitely, and he can take more time
to come up wi
Ok, I am slightly confused here right now. From the comments I see that
the current SRUs are not enough for the bug to be fixed, is that
correct? Especially that I see debdiffs for bionic *and* focal attached.
Also, with so many different comments and issues regarding verification,
I think I would
Verified focal and groovy
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup time
** Patch added: "bionic-8.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5382044/+files/bionic-8.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Patch added: "focal-5.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5382022/+files/focal-5.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
@nicolasbock as we talked about, you can't just throw new changes into
Bionic without working on Focal/Groovy (and upstream) first.
Additionally, to address the actual change, I'm concerned you are adding
a config file to get the mnesia and rabbitmq timeouts to match - that
doesn't help anyone ups
** Patch added: "bionic-7.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5382013/+files/bionic-7.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Hi @ddstreet. By default rabbitmq-server will wait for 300 seconds
before it gives up. Raising the timeout in the systemd service file is
not sufficient to guarantee that rabbitmq-server will wait for 10
minutes. We can either add the new configuration file or add a retry to
the systemd service fil
Hi @nicolasbock, it looks like the latest debdiff is adding in a new
config file, and that change doesn't appear to be upstream, or even in
focal or groovy...can you clarify what that config file is needed and if
you'll work to get it upstream before it goes into bionic?
--
You received this bug
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-failed-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between Sys
I tested the bionic proposed and found that it was still missing a few
things. I have updated and tested the package. The new debdiff is
attached.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
** Patch added: "bionic-6.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5380685/+files/bionic-6.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Thanks Nicolas!
Sorry, I missed your comment that you'd verify the SRU
before posting; I hadn't refreshed the page. Oops :)
cheers!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rab
I have a test env already set up Mauricio. I'll test it there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To manag
Bryan, thanks for clarifying!
Nicolas, hey! :) I guess since you're familiar with the patch,
there might be a simpler test-case to check just the SRUs are
working as expected? And then expand on to the charm changes
that should rely on them (IIUIC)?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notificatio
I'll try to verify the SRU. The steps are the same as in the Test Case
from the description. The original package will fail fairly quickly. The
SRU should fail after 10 minutes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
The current test case does not work for SRU verification. If there is a
different test case that just targets the specific change, we could use
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874
I guess if the SRU changes are good on their own,
they should be marked as verification done; then
the charm changes should also be looked at?
Or does the need for charm changes as well should
invalidate these SRU contents?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Sorry, meant to update the bug. It appears that just this SRU change is
not enough and Charm changes are needed as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server
Hi Bryan and Nicolas,
Just a friendly reminder that this bug is pending -proposed verification
(X/B/F) before it can be released to -updates.
cheers,
Mauricio
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Brian, I created https://github.com/nicolasbock/rabbitmq-test with some
scripts you can use to test rabbitmq. Please let me know if you have any
question on how to use those.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Is there a specific example command to run for
1. create queue on A
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rabbitmq-server into xenial-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-
server/3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this n
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rabbitmq-server into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-
server/3.6.10-1ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rabbitmq-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-
server/3.8.2-0ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
This bug was fixed in the package rabbitmq-server - 3.8.3-0ubuntu1
---
rabbitmq-server (3.8.3-0ubuntu1) groovy; urgency=medium
* New upstream release:
- d/watch: Fix watch file to download from GitHub
-- Nicolas Bock Wed, 13 May 2020 14:25:28
+
** Changed in: rabbitmq-s
for groovy, the upstream merge is being worked in bug 1878049
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Groovy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Groovy)
Assignee: James Page (james-page) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts di
@james-page, it looks like elixir-lang in groovy has exceeded the limit
that rabbitmq-server wants to build with; since our rabbitmq-server is
newer than Debian, I'm not sure what your merge process from upstream
is. Can you do another upstream merge please so rabbitmq-server is
buildable in groov
The groovy upload of this has failed to build and the SRU won't be
processed until the fix also exists in groovy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup
** Patch added: "focal-4.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5364178/+files/focal-4.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Patch added: "bionic-5.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5364177/+files/bionic-5.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Patch added: "xenial-6.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5364176/+files/xenial-6.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Patch added: "xenial-3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363773/+files/xenial-3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Patch added: "bionic-3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363754/+files/bionic-3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Patch added: "focal-3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363740/+files/focal-3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Patch added: "groovy-3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363738/+files/groovy-3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
T
** Patch added: "bionic-2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363537/+files/bionic-2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Patch added: "xenial-2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363538/+files/xenial-2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Patch added: "groovy-2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363533/+files/groovy-2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Patch added: "focal-2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5363534/+files/focal-2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
** Description changed:
The startup timeouts were recently adjusted and synchronized between the
SysV and systemd startup files.
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server-release/pull/129
The new startup files should be included in this package.
[Impact]
After starting th
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #958468
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958468
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958468
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
** Patch added: "groovy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5362032/+files/groovy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18740
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-ddstreet
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To manage notifications about this
Nicolas, can you please produce a 'groovy' 20.10 debdiff ?
Thanks
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
** Patch removed: "focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358143/+files/focal.debdiff
** Patch removed: "eoan.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358144/+files/eoan.debdiff
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Eoan)
Assignee: Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Low => Undecided
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
** Patch added: "xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358546/+files/xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18740
Thanks Eric.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
The rationale behind not fixing Eoan can be found in the LP: #1773324
Note that Eoan will reach EOL in July 2020.
- Eric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
Title:
rabbitmq-server
Eoan FTBFS as follows:
==> rabbitmqctl
** (Mix) You're trying to run :rabbitmqctl on Elixir v1.9.1 but it has declared
in its mix.exs file it supports only Elixir >= 1.6.6 and < 1.8.0
make[4]: *** [Makefile:93: escript/rabbitmqctl] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory '/<>/deps/rabbitmq_cli'
make[3
** Patch added: "bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358462/+files/bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18740
** Patch added: "eoan.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358461/+files/eoan.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
** Patch added: "focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358453/+files/focal.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal)
St
** Patch added: "xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358162/+files/xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18740
** Patch added: "bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358158/+files/bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18740
** Patch added: "eoan.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358144/+files/eoan.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
** Patch removed: "focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5357562/+files/timeout.debdiff
** Patch added: "focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358143/+files/focal.debdif
** Patch added: "eoan.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5358045/+files/eoan.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075
I have updated the description Eric. Please have another look
** Description changed:
- ## DRAFT SRU TMPL ##
- [Impact]
+ The startup timeouts were recently adjusted and synchronized between the
+ SysV and systemd startup files.
- * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+ htt
The attachment "timeout.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if yo
Thanks for your patch Nicolas.
As discussed, Focal (20.04 LTS) is transitionning from development to
stable. If this fix is not release critical (which seems to be the
case), we may need to wait a little bit.
We will sponsor right after the transition ends.
Meanwhile could you please:
* Add the
** Description changed:
- The startup timeouts were recently adjusted and synchronized between the
- SysV and systemd startup files.
+ ## DRAFT SRU TMPL ##
+ [Impact]
+
+ * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+
+ * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
** Patch added: "timeout.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+attachment/5357562/+files/timeout.debdiff
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal)
Imp
92 matches
Mail list logo
