[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2009-07-15 Thread Scott James Remnant
Fixed in Karmic where tools use libblkid from util-linux ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2009-04-16 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 19:16 +, Mikael Ståldal wrote: blkid has the bad practice of updating a file in /etc (blkid.tab). This is annoying and against the spirit of a href=http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#ETCHOSTSPECIFICSYSTEMCONFIGURATION;FHS/a. If you test the packages in my

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2009-04-15 Thread Scott James Remnant
Already way ahead of you, this work has been done upstream but in the opposite direction - we've merged vol_id and blkid together into a libblkid library shipped by util-linux-ng. Packages exist in my PPA for testing, and we'll begin using this in karmic -- tools should use libvolume-id instead

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2009-04-15 Thread Mikael Ståldal
blkid has the bad practice of updating a file in /etc (blkid.tab). This is annoying and against the spirit of a href=http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#ETCHOSTSPECIFICSYSTEMCONFIGURATION;FHS/a. Can you fix that while you're at it? -- tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2009-04-14 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquene
Changing status to confirmed; apparently everyone agrees that something should be done. ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235165 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2008-06-03 Thread Scott James Remnant
For every bug report someone files where their ext3 filesystem is reported as a FAT filesystem, somebody else files a bug where their FAT filesystem is reported as an ext3 filesystem. Of course, that doesn't mean common sense could be applied. The priority should always be towards our favoured

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2008-06-02 Thread Scott James Remnant
See attached patch from SuSE ** Attachment added: e2fsprogs-libvolume_id-support.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14904049/e2fsprogs-libvolume_id-support.patch -- tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235165 You received this bug notification

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2008-06-02 Thread Theodore Ts'o
PS, I'll note the original bug that started this chain was started because libvolume_id gave the wrong answer, erroneously reporting an ext3 filesystem as FAT. I've tried working with the vol_id folks before, and they are not interested in patches to make libvolume_id give more correct answers,

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2008-06-02 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Note that libvolume_id BREAKS ext4 support. For that reason the e2fsprogs patch HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED IN MAINLINE. I am telling people who are using ubuntu to back out the changes in mount that switch it to use volume_id, as they are problematic for ext4, and recompile mount if they want to use

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2008-06-02 Thread Scott James Remnant
And that would leave us with the situation where depending which tool you pass the UUID to, you'll get a different block device. We don't want two libraries for doing the exact same thing, in different ways. We want one library only. Right now, the library that has the most patches to use it is

[Bug 235165] Re: tools should use libvolume-id instead of libblkid

2008-06-02 Thread Theodore Ts'o
When I have submitted patches in the past, to fix problems such as the one that kicked off this thread (an ext3 filesystem erroneously getting reported as a FAT filesystem), it was rejected by the libvolume_id maintainer. I've been very busy trying to get ext4 production ready, and decided I