I'd neglected to say how Ubuntu base should be sorted. I've done that
now.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareUpdates?action=diffrev2=109rev1=108
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Specification updated.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareUpdates?action=diffrev2=104rev1=103
The simple implementation is making the column headers clickable, but
I've also specced a View menu as an accessible equivalent.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
**
Luca, I can understand sorting by name and by size, and I can do a
design for that. But you also mention sorting by version. Did you have a
use case in mind for that? It seems to me that most packages would have
different version numbering schemes, so sorting by version wouldn't help
you find
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 878203
Accesibility: Make update list sortable and add option to select/deselect
all like in other update managers or synaptic
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
--
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878203 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878203
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878203
Accesibility: Make update list sortable and add option to select/deselect
all like in other update managers or synaptic
--
You received this bug
