** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: Unknown = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
Title:
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: High = Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
Title:
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
It seems I've let this report run wild: The issue in this bug is EXA
being damn slow on some Intel graphics chipsets. While the issue has
yet to be fixed, the things being discussed here have nothing to do with
it.
I'm removing myself from the mailing list for the report because it no
longer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252094 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 252094
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug
This is not a duplicate of bug #252094:
This is referring specifically to a performance regression in jaunty, on
chipsets that worked fine under intrepid.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 252094
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
Carey, using UXA does not fix your problem? These issues are known
regressions in EXA, which is why I marked it as a dupe of #252094.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
As far as jaunty is concerned, is it not established that UXA isn't a
fix?
The existence of a similar workaround doesn't imply that the bug is the
same, and the bug in question states specifically that bugs with the
generic symptoms but known particular causes should be in their own bug
reports.
(... not noted on the other bug because the other bug is generic issues,
and the oversight is particular to the 945)
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
As far as jaunty is concerned, is it not established that UXA isn't a
fix?
I have a hard time understanding this particular double negation :-).
But I just tested setting
Option AccelMethod UXA
in my xorg.conf and it looks like it fixed the speed issue. There are
other small issues
UXA will not be enabled by default in jaunty, and so enabling it by hand
is a workaround, not a fix.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This is unfortunate... Seems like a serious regression from Intrepid.
Can you suggest any link to read some introduction about what are EXA
and UXA and why the latter is not possible for Jaunty?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug
The various intel bugs currently on launchpad have extensive commentary
on the problems and the rationales. Unfortunately, many of the bugs
recently marked as duplicate contained that commentary, and so won't
show up in the search results by default.
Hence, my underwhelming response for with
I agree with Kevin this bug has wandered from the original issue.
I'm closing this bug for the following reasons:
* It has the same upstream bug link as our bug #349992, so at heart is a dupe
of that. Bug 349992 is further along, shorter, and already assigned and
targeted, so it's the better
Upstream has submitted a patch which disables gem in the kernel
2.6.29.
Ofir, can you link it here?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I can confirm this bug too on my Dell M1330.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I would like to confirm this bug too and would like to say that i had
to disable all the compositing manager in both UXA/EXA... because after
few hours when i'm using them switching between applications makes my
computer becoming really slow because there is a lots of writing on my
hard drive..
2 years ago I was recommending for everyone to use intel vga, but now it
seems vga are horrible :( hope this will improve.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Upstream has submitted a patch which disables gem in the kernel 2.6.29.
Will this patch solve the performance issues, or at least 'solve' them for the
final release?
Is this patch needed to be applied manually, or it will be bundled in ubuntu's
official deb?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor
Confirming poor performance comparing to Intrepid with xserver-xorg-
video-intel 2.6.3. Should I gather any statistics from my machine (and
how?) or the case is clear and everyone just waiting a fix?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this
mah i don't think so ,
i used an -server kernel and it was nice then...
so i think it's a problem with the new driver or something like that
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Could it be that this problem is related to systems were the graphic
chip is connected through AGP?
I think, it may be. with
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)
configuration: driver=agpgart-intel module=intel_agp
I'm
Could it be that this problem is related to systems were the graphic
chip is connected through AGP?
Performance is still very slow for me.
In Ioquake3 I get in Intrepid 87 FPS and in Jaunty 11 FPS w/o DRI2. (Resolution
640x480)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile
I went from smoothly dragging transparent windows around the screen a
week ago (but only when running the -server kernel, -generic got 1fps)
to one-frame-per-second as of right now (under the -server kernel or the
-generic kernel).
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile
@ Cerey: Maybe your problem is related to bug 340578. For me it helped
to disable v-sync in compiz.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I found this article. Maybe that explains it.
For me numbers fit as they say. Drom from ~1000 fps to 440 fps in
glxgears.
http://qa-rockstar.livejournal.com/7869.html
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you
No I don't think so.
Jaunty has no KMS and DRI2 will not be enabled by default.
Haven't you seen my comment with the results of ioquake3?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
@Matthias: that bug is unrelated, different hardware. Also, UXA just
hardlocks the machine.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I lied, it's actually just X that locks up with a corrupted display.
chvt'ing, restoring vbestate and posting the display brings back a
terminal session.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I updated the driver from the repositories from 2.6.1 to 2.6.3 and got
no improvements.
glxgears gives around 200 FPS.
Maybe KDE4 needs better hardware then the one in my laptop (lenovo 3000
N100)? or it is a bug in the driver?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
On one of my systems with 4Gb of RAM I use the -server kernel and the
performance is still slow.
Using the -generic kernel all works fine, but I use only a part of memory.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because
kubuntu 9.04 alpha6
intel 945gm
compiz sucks kwin idem
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Could it be related that in Jaunty with kernel 2.6.28 WorldOfGoo is
unplayable due to poor performances ? Strangely enough, glxgears is at
250 fps and it looks like Compiz runs smoothly (I didn't try the cube
but other effects were just fine)
With kernel 2.6.27 on the same system, worlofgoo works
Update to 2.6.3? Wishlist bug 337301
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Does anyone knows when 2.6.2 will come to Jaunty?
Will the driver be updated to 2.6.2 until the final release in April?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
With xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.6.1 I get around 300 FPS, but it is
still slow.
Silviu Grijincu:
How can I install the 2.6.2 version? (I guess it is not from the repositories
since only 2.6.1 is in there).
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You
I guess, he compiled it from source.
2009/2/26 Ofir Klinger klinger.o...@gmail.com:
With xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.6.1 I get around 300 FPS, but it is
still slow.
Silviu Grijincu:
How can I install the 2.6.2 version? (I guess it is not from the repositories
since only 2.6.1 is in there).
xf86-video-intel 2.6.2 is released, perhaps this fixes our issues?
Here is the changes:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-February/044003.html
And according to a blog post by Eric Anholt, it looks like we may still see an
xf86-video-intel 2.7.0 release by the end of March, pehaps
Also confirming this on jaunty alpha 4. Compositing (both compiz and
KDE) is unusable.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Today my KDE4 session runs smoothly with about 900fps in glxgears.
Then I update the distro (kernel and intel driver) and it falls down to 90fps.
What happen?
In attach the /var/log/apt/term.log of last broken update (italian lang log,
sorry)
I apologize for my bad English.
** Attachment
By installing xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.6.2, hardware acceleration is working
again.
I get 1019.751 FPS on glxgears.
To install the 2.6.2 version you need to install libdrm-2.4.5
first(prerequisite)
Sources:
[1] http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/
[2]
Do you think this bug will be fixed until the next alpha? or beta? and
what about the final release?
I am asking because the desktop (I have tested kubuntu 9.04 alpha 4) is not
usable with these bad performance, and in the freedesktop bug
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16835) one
confirmed in jaunty alpha 4 even though using GEM and DRI2 even worser
tested using wine running warcraft3 ft fps drops to 11 from 20 in intrepid
my chipset:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
I
ntegrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a02] (rev 03)
Well, I disabled VBlank and got a boost, but it's still real slow:
4312 frames in 5.0 seconds = 862.341 FPS
4288 frames in 5.0 seconds = 857.482 FPS
4141 frames in 5.0 seconds = 828.042 FPS
4223 frames in 5.0 seconds = 844.442 FPS
Switching desktops with compiz on is unusable most of the time,
I can confirm this bug on all my systems upgrading from Kubutnu intrepid to
Kubuntu jaunty.
glxgears fall from 600 fps down to 60 fps.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
2009/2/10 Michele Mordenti michele.morde...@gmail.com:
I can confirm this bug on all my systems upgrading from Kubutnu intrepid to
Kubuntu jaunty.
glxgears fall from 600 fps down to 60 fps.
Please, read thread and you'll find the answer. Performance shouldn't
drop lower than to 50%.
--
Vit
Hey people.
Read the thread, please. I'm almost certain that your problem was
discussed here.
Run driconf and In Synchronization with vertical refresh select to
never synchronize.
FPS should go up. It went for me. But I'm still 50% below performance
of 2.4 driver.
2009/1/30 Jacob Peddicord
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:59:59PM -, Jacob Peddicord wrote:
mdz:
You cannot reproduce your xrandr workaround, or cannot reproduce the
performance issues? I just updated everything and I still get poor
results.
After a suspend/resume cycle, the problem is back, and changing the xrandr
Matt, that's bug 320813 and the workaround is to disable vblank.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I also experience this problem. I tried disabling sync to VBlank in
compiz, but it's still slow. Also, OpenGL games are painfully slow :( I
attach my Xorg.0.log, and my xorg.conf is empty
My FPS:
289 frames in 5.0 seconds = 57.687 FPS
309 frames in 5.0 seconds = 61.761 FPS
My Card:
00:02.0 VGA
Interestingly, I noticed that the performance is OK if I use an external
display and disable the internal LCD with xrandr --output LVDS --off.
If I switch the LVDS output back on, performance becomes awful again
(regardless of whether an external display is connected).
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver
I've just upgraded to the latest Jaunty and can no longer reproduce
this. xserver-xorg-video-intel was not updated, but the kernel was, so
perhaps the problem was there?
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you
mdz:
You cannot reproduce your xrandr workaround, or cannot reproduce the
performance issues? I just updated everything and I still get poor
results.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I just wanted to tell you that during boot udev complains about
missing /dev/card0 (or /dev/dri/card0?).
I'm still at ~ 450 fps in glxgears on GMA950, Core Duo and 2 GB RAM.
Regards
Vit Pelcak
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug
Belisarivs schrieb:
I just wanted to tell you that during boot udev complains about
missing /dev/card0 (or /dev/dri/card0?).
I'm still at ~ 450 fps in glxgears on GMA950, Core Duo and 2 GB RAM.
Regards
Vit Pelcak
probobly your i915 module will be loaded from initrd or not loaded at all.
probobly your i915 module will be loaded from initrd or not loaded at all.
check it with: lsmod | grep i915
$ lsmod | grep i915
i915 65412 1
drm96424 2 i915
or remove it from this list /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
It wasn't there.
--
Vit Pelcak
--
After latest update from 26.01.09 (jaunty amd64) the performance with
glxgearx dropped to 40 fps.
before it was 300 fps with vanilla linux-next kernal and 150 fps with
2.6.28-5-generic.
I just testet UXA acceleration and gat 870 fps with linux-next and 750
fps with 2.6.28-5-generic
--
[i945]
2009/1/26 fishor bug-tr...@fisher-privat.net:
After latest update from 26.01.09 (jaunty amd64) the performance with
glxgearx dropped to 40 fps.
before it was 300 fps with vanilla linux-next kernal and 150 fps with
2.6.28-5-generic.
I just testet UXA acceleration and gat 870 fps with
Could you, please, provide your xorg.conf which helped you to improve
performance?
Which graphics accelerator do you have? GMA950?
Yes this is GMA950 on i945g
Here is my xorg.conf
** Attachment added: xorg.conf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21640553/xorg.conf
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver
2009/1/26 fishor bug-tr...@fisher-privat.net:
Could you, please, provide your xorg.conf which helped you to improve
performance?
Which graphics accelerator do you have? GMA950?
Yes this is GMA950 on i945g
Here is my xorg.conf
Thanks.
--
Vit Pelcak
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor
Today I have tested intel 2.6 drivers and 2.6.28 kernel. I can't report
any improvement in 2D compiz performance setup is same as in my previous
posts. I've tried kernel with PAE enabled and disabled, system is i386
(32 bit), acceleration UXA and the same error in log:
(EE) intel(0): Failed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| fishor, attach your /var/log/xorg.0.log, you may not be seeing the same
| issues.
Hmm... other performance drop was realy coused by other issu, i915 was
loaded but /dev/dri/card0 not existed. I reloaded this module and now it
work with 360fps. But
Hah, right. You're on 64 bit, and therefore don't have pae on the
server kernel, and therefore don't have gem disabled due to pae being
enabled, and therefore still have the issue.
Current Operating System: Linux zwerg 2.6.28-4-server #11-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan
16 22:38:58 UTC 2009 x86_64
...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16835: The error message
was cleaned up, but fixing the performance regression is out of scope
for this release cycle.
...which leaves me in a somewhat foul mood.
Rebooting into 2.6.27 works for me I guess.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/d656dfef0d5b46d4
commit a7f014f2de04893f95cfe40fe35f15c8dae4b36e
Author: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
Date: Tue Nov 25 14:02:05 2008 -0800
drm/i915: Respect GM965/GM45 bit-17-instead-of-bit-11 option for
swizzling.
This
Noted a patch above the above one, that disabled gem when pae is enabled
due to some interaction. Our -server kernel has pae enabled. This
suggests a workaround...
And having installed the -server kernel (2.6.27-4-server), I can confirm
that it works around this issue.
Kevin, can you install
Also, syockit off #ubuntu+1 seems to have an identical chipset, but
without this issue (notably, his xorg.0.log file doesn't show the (EE)
intel(0): Failed to set tiling on depth buffer: rejected by kernel
lines that mine and kevin's does)
** Attachment added: xorg.0.log from a _working_ intel,
** Attachment added: xorg.0.log, 2.6.28-server, working
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21502263/Xorg.0.log
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
(which leaves me in a somewhat less foul mood)
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: xorg.0.log, 2.6.28-generic, not working
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21502255/Xorg.0.log.old
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
i can't confirm it. With server kernel i have less performance.
generick kernel glxgears ~350fps
server kernel glxgears ~160fps
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
fishor, attach your /var/log/xorg.0.log, you may not be seeing the same
issues.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Directrix1 wrote 11 hours ago: (permalink)
In the file: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules change the line that reads
like:
KERNEL==card[0-9]*, NAME=dri/%k
to this:
KERNEL==card[0-9]*, MODE=0666, NAME=dri/%k
That got DRI at least partially working but it is still dog slow (but
not as
** Tags added: 3d 945gm performance
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
In the file: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules change the line that reads
like:
KERNEL==card[0-9]*, NAME=dri/%k
to this:
KERNEL==card[0-9]*, MODE=0666, NAME=dri/%k
That got DRI at least partially working but it is still dog slow (but not as
slow at least). I'm using
Thank's Jeffrey. Yes, you are right. Glxgers performance was limited due
vsync settings. In 2.6.27 kernel with disabled vsync and unchanged conf.
form my previous posts is now glxgers performance:
r...@migo-vaio:/etc# glxgears
Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic.
3280 frames in
Guys, try glxinfo | grep render. Most probably you have sw rendering.
For no obvious reason, I couldn't get hw acceleration working. That is
reason of performance drop.
I didn't try compiz with it, gut in glxgears I experienced drom from
~1000 fps to ~300 fps.
However, upgrading by edgers
I'm sure I've HW acceleration on all the tests:
Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic.
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 945GM 20080716 x86/MMX/SSE2
and
r...@migo-vaio:~/# glxgears
Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic.
293 frames in 5.0
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Milan Oravec mora...@ukf.sk wrote:
I'm sure I've HW acceleration on all the tests:
Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic.
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 945GM 20080716 x86/MMX/SSE2
and
r...@migo-vaio:~/#
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
The new 2.5.1 release of the Intel driver gives horrible performance.
Screenshot with fps marker, under compiz: http://oasis-
games.com/~klange/wtf_intel251.png
As seen in the screenshot, the standard cube
Same here. X is almost unusable in the current configuration. Mouse pointer
does not keep up with movements.
Dell Vostro 1400
Intel X3100 GM965
...
OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM GEM 20080716 x86/MMX/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 2.1
I'm also suffering under this issues. My hw is i945GM in sony vaio
sz1xp, distribution is ubuntu interpid with Jaunty xorg-edgers ppa
packages. I always compile my own kernel which exactly suits my hw, and
have tux on ice support.
When I'm on 2.6.28 kernel, I'm able to enable GEM via UXA option
I'm not sure if this is the same problem as I has but I recently
stumbled on a dead-slow compiz after getting DRI2/UXA to work on my
jaunty install using a intel 965 and xorg-edgers ppa.
I nailed to problem down to the compiz-wrapper (/usr/bin/compiz) not
using -indirect-rendering when UXA/DRI2
mrvanes: I shouldn't be commenting on this, since its not in its own
bug, but with the DRI2 drivers, I believe you'll find there is a problem
with syncing to VBlank. Try turning off sync to vblank in the compiz
settings. For me, this made a difference of 1frame every 3 seconds -
complety usable.
I experience this bug, too.
# lspci -vvnn
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML
and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub [8086:27a0] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:30d5]
Upgrading from edgers repository helped a bit.
Now I have hw acceleration on.
$ glxinfo | grep render
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 945GM GEM 20080716 x86/MMX/SSE2
But performance is still quite a low (half compared to opensuse 11.1).
With exa, glxgears had
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
Status: Incomplete = Triaged
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Missing a few things in my last comment:
don't *have* GEM support...
... which did*n't* have this problem at all...
Don't know how that happened. I guess I type these in a hurry.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification
Bryce Harrington schrieb:
[This is an automatic notice.]
We'd like to forward your bug upstream, however upstream requires
that you first test it against their newer driver code.
To save you the effort of building the driver from source, we've built
packages for the driver and its new
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #16835
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16835
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16835
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Unknown = In Progress
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I will test the newest updates, which I'm installing now. I'll report
back later today.
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Problem persists in newest updates; in fact, it seems to be even worse.
Further, we still don't GEM support in our DRM drivers. I'd also like to
report that earlier I had tested the drivers and X server from Xorg-
edgers, which did have this problem at all (though it did have another
big issue
If im Correct this is a bug for both kernel and intel driver.
With ubuntu kernel i get 130 fps on glxgears
With vanilla 2.6.28-rc9 i get 380fps
this i have with ubuntu kernel too:
mtrr: no MTRR for d000,1000 found
now i will try to bisect intel driver. Or some body doing this?
--
[This is an automatic notice.]
We'd like to forward your bug upstream, however upstream requires
that you first test it against their newer driver code.
To save you the effort of building the driver from source, we've built
packages for the driver and its new dependencies.
So you have a couple
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
[i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011
You received this bug notification because you are a
I can confirm that Compiz (along with everything else 3D) still runs
very slowly, with glxgears running at around 200FPS (or about 300FPS
with card0 permissions set properly). This is after applying the latest
updates.
Attached my X log, though I was unable to find anything out of the
ordinary in
97 matches
Mail list logo
