[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Since the reporter won't provide a test case, and I believe that the upload fixed the bug, I'm closing that bug report. ** Changed in: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I've just uploaded a new version of the package: 1.9.1.243-1ubuntu1 Could you check that it fixes this bug? Thank you -- ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413815 You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/08/09 at 01:31 -, gleeo wrote: Okay, but there is a serious problem with the current installation. It needs to be fixed, if you want to try to patch rbconfig.rb then that is fine but that is a dirty hack IMO. I don't see why --program-suffix= would not work, but maybe try to address

Re: [Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Could you provide simple recipes to reproduce the problems you are seeing, so I can test that my fix actually fixes your problems? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- ruby 1.9.1 should

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-19 Thread gleeo
No, I don't see why you would do that. The best solution would be to build with ./configure --program-suffix=*extension you tend to build with with, for example, 1.9.1* This is the best solution, let ruby do the work for you, rather then bypass what ruby has setup for you and try to hack on it

Re: [Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/08/09 at 16:41 -, gleeo wrote: No, I don't see why you would do that. The best solution would be to build with ./configure --program-suffix=*extension you tend to build with with, for example, 1.9.1* This is the best solution, let ruby do the work for you, rather then bypass what

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-19 Thread gleeo
Okay, but there is a serious problem with the current installation. It needs to be fixed, if you want to try to patch rbconfig.rb then that is fine but that is a dirty hack IMO. I don't see why --program-suffix= would not work, but maybe try to address that problem? At the moment, rubygems, mkmf,

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
So a better solution would be to hack up rbconfig.rb to point to /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1, right? -- ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-14 Thread gleeo
Sorry, I didn't explain myself clearly in the initial bug report. The ruby 1.9.1 package made available in the karmic repository should have been built with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if the binary is going to be installed as '/usr/bin/ruby1.9.1' but it fails to do so. Possible problems could