** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
wine 0.9.45 for amd64 is in gutsy now.
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
well than... it seems there is a new bugs again if u running beryl
or compiz fusion, just try to press alt+f4 at the desktop... and it will
turned into text mode... tty2.. just try that bugs... please check...
and reply. u must run on ubuntu. thx
-
@jojoaditya
That's not a bug. You have 6 text-consoles available (control+alt+f1 upto
control+alt+f6)
Control+alt+f7 will bring you back to the graphical desktop.
Although the common user wouldn't need or use this, the more experienced
users can use this to reset GDM for example. Also this is
So, will this be in Gutsy or not?
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I filed a sync request for wine-0.9.42-1 from Debian. (bug #137566)
Hopefully these packages do get merged in time for the release of Gutsy.
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
It appears that a 64 bit build for wine has been in Debian since
0.9.29-1 (21st of January). This is the problem when people don't merge
Debian changes.
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Ladies Gentlemen,
Debian is for wine not our upstream.
Furthermore, the debian package is evil and ugly.
We are working on an approach which is far better, and follows the
Ubuntu way (compiling everything from source).
Kind Regards,
\sh
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
Even better, there's wine-0.9.44 packages being worked on.
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=184
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
It looks like building 32-bit wine on amd64 will be possible soon, if it's not
possible now. Take a look at http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=wine
Also, these links should be relevant.
http://bugs.debian.org/430845
http://bugs.debian.org/394230
http://bugs.debian.org/381341
A sync request
I'm glad I checked before logging a new bug. This still seems to be an
issue for Gutsy (i.e. it hasn't been moved into the Gutsy universe yet).
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Actually, I'm not an MOTU so someone else needs to upload it to Gutsy
for me.
packages.ubuntu.com says the Wine in Gutsy is 0.9.42, which I'm assuming
is the package I made. But it's not being built in 64 bit mode. Could
whomever is responsible for merging in the package contact me?
--
There
Does this package contain a 64-bit wine binary? Will that binary run
32bit Windows applications? If not then I think it would be a big
misstake to include it.
The thing users want when they install wine is to run some specific
Windows program, and probably 99.9% of all Windows programs is only
I agree that I want to be able to run 32bit windows binaries, but I
can't do that right now because there is NO wine package available to me
in Gutsy (at least as far as I can tell). Specifically, I am running an
AMD x2 so I picked the 64bit KUbuntu to go with that. If I have just
missed the
The 64 bit package I put at winehq is actually a 32 bit version (that
only runs win32 and win16 apps), built to link against the 32 bit
libraries on the 64 bit version of Ubuntu (which are in a different
place than in the 32 bit version).
So, yes, it's what you want, and I'm not sure why it's not
Actually, it is being built in Gutsy, but the build script is failing:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8598218/buildlog_ubuntu-gutsy-
amd64.wine_0.9.42-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
I'll have to install Gutsy and take a look at it myself.
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
Scott - It seems like I already have the platform around to take a look.
How can I help?
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The 64 bit version compiles fine now, and I'll be moving it into Gutsy
universe soon. You can get it already for Feisty here:
http://winehq.org/site/download-deb
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:20:46 am Andres Mejia wrote:
amd64 packages exist for wine in Debian but only up to version 0.9.34.
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wine/
dget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wine/wine_0.9.34-1.dsc
We should take a look to see what is done to
amd64 packages exist for wine in Debian but only up to version 0.9.34.
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wine/
dget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wine/wine_0.9.34-1.dsc
We should take a look to see what is done to create the amd64 packages.
--
There is no 64 bit package
Just to throw in some perspective, . . .
Windows Vista has had problems with software compatibility on 64-bit
machines. Even fans of Windows (the poor souls) have complained about
it. See http://forums.jinx.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=60206 and
I just installed Feisty on an AMD64 (X2 6000+ to be exact), and I still
have not been able to get wine to run. Everything I've tried results in
'segmentation fault' on winecfg, apparently as it tries to create the
~/.wine path and establish a faux-registry.
I tried emk's instructions a few posts
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Stephan Hermann = Ubuntu Wine Team
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Should we begin to transition package names for i386 archs as well? I
think that might make life a little more easier than the overall picture
we currently have now. I.E: i386 can install wine32 (wine becomes a
transition package for a release), while AMD64 users have their choice
of wine64 or
Thanks, Scott Ritchie!
I've tested the packages in the repository described at
http://www.winehq.org/site/download-deb on a clean 64-bit Feisty system,
and everything seems to work fine.
As you can see, I didn't have any 32-bit packages on my system before
the install:
$ sudo apt-get install
Having recently obtained access to a 64 bit virtual machine, I was able
to attempt making a proper 64 bit package today.
I combined elements of Chris Halse Rogers hack with an email I got from
Ken Geis. I'll be uploading the 64 bit packages for Feisty to the
winehq APT repository sometime
Hi Scott,
my concerns were not to not support win32 anymore but, to have different
packages for wine32 on 32 and 64bit.
There will be support for 32bit and 64bit wine, but to have 32bit support on
64bit archs we have to provide separate packages for wine32 on 64bit archs
(e.g. wine for 32bit
This appears to be a wine related thread. Please open a seperate
firefox issues if necessary.
Thanks
David
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43324
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
hi Scott,
if you want to add wine 32bit packages to 64bit archs, please add new
binary packages to it, like (lib)wine32, which are only build on 64bit
archs like amd64 or emt64.
Don't use libwine/wine package names, because they should be reserved
for arch dependent packages.
so (lib)wine on
today i was mucking about with building wine from the source packages on my
feisty amd64 box as i have been on random occasions for a while.
today i thought i would try getting wine built as a 32bit app.
so using the LDFLAGS from the Ubuntu section of this page
Peter,
Could you please try running configure with the above flags and
--verbose and see if it reports anything missing?
Also, have you made any modifications to the system other than
installing packages that are relevant (eg manually linking libraries in
/usr/lib32)? Ideally we can incorporate
(do you want to see the entire output from the configure?)
OpenGL seems to be missing.
which would explain why directx stuff doesn't seem to work.
---
configure: WARNING: Wine will be build without OpenGL or Direct3D support
configure: WARNING: because something is wrong with the OpenGL setup:
I'm pretty sure you need to hand-link at least some of the GL libraries
(which my debdiff does - it built correctly in a pristine pbuilder). I
might see how much of it is still necessary with 0.9.29, though.
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43324
--
Here's a somewhat ugly debdiff which makes the package successfully
build a 32bit wine on x86-64.
It stops the win64 support being built, but I'm not convinced that's a
huge loss. As far as I can tell, the overwhelming use-case for wine is
win32 programs - there's a huge number of win32 programs
But I think that introducing such binary package is mach better and it seems
to me most users think same.
On 11/16/06, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
on 64bit you could create a 32bit chroot and change into it via dchroot
...
you can install wine 32bit in there and everything
Hi,
on 64bit you could create a 32bit chroot and change into it via dchroot ...
you can install wine 32bit in there and everything is ok.
In my POV it's a better solution then to introduce additional binary
packages for only one architecture.
Regards,
\sh
--
There is no 64 bit package
I think you are wrong. 32bit wine is extremely useful on 64bit to run 32bit
windows apps.
On 11/13/06, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Morning,
building the last version in edgy (0.9.22) failed for 64bit
architectures, because Upstreams 64bit support is somehow broken.
As I
Good Morning,
building the last version in edgy (0.9.22) failed for 64bit
architectures, because Upstreams 64bit support is somehow broken.
As I said in last reports, I don't like a wine 32bit solution on 64bit
architectures...it should compile as native application on 64bit
archseverything
I think that there is an already a quite know method for install wine 32
bit on amd 64[1]
Mainly need
libxxf86dga1 (32bit missing)
ia32-libs (already in amd64 repo)
lib32asound2 ia32-libs-sdl (already in amd64 repo)
So i think that is quite trivial to insert a wine32 version in amd64 rerpo.
Any
The trick is not forcing the dependencies, it's getting the thing to
BUILD on AMD64. All my attempts at that have failed so far.
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43324
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi,
I'm trying to build first 64bit packages for native win64 support.
This should be not a difficult task.
For having win32 support on 64bit environments, it needs more then this.
We need to invent new packages, e.g. wine32, which have to be built only on
64bit machines (forgetting ppc
** Bug 43320 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43324
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43324
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
43 matches
Mail list logo
