This was intentional, as the redirect to /apache2-default/ appeared to
confuse the heck out of users when they went to edit their website
(which should be in /var/www)
Having the default site in a subdirectory (because we really
can't/shouldn't install and overwrite an index.html in /var/www) is
I take it this bug should be rejected then?
--
Default host unconfigured after LAMP installation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66926
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Indeed, rejecting.
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto = Adam Conrad
--
Default host unconfigured after LAMP installation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66926
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
apache2.conf is attached. Please do not hesitate contacting me if you
need any other configuration or log file.
** Attachment added: Apache 2 configuration file
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4890956/apache2.conf
--
Default host unconfigured after LAMP installation
Confirmed by mvo on amd64.
Targetted bug for ubuntu-6.10.
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
Target: None = ubuntu-6.10
--
Default host unconfigured after LAMP installation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66926
--
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
--
Default host unconfigured after LAMP installation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66926
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
