[Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Sladen
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote: I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using fonts-[foundry]-fontname-console. I've uploaded a bump of 'ubuntu-font-family-sources' Source with the console-font building code uncommented[0][1]: $ dpkg -L

[Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-11-24 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Paul Sladen (pkg-fo...@paul.sladen.org): On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote: I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using fonts-[foundry]-fontname-console. I've uploaded a bump of 'ubuntu-font-family-sources' Source with the console-font building code

Re: [Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Jul 2011, at 11:31, Paul Wise (Debian) 724...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I guess you didn't notice, but in Debian we are moving to a new font package naming policy. We are getting rid of the format-specific prefix for font packages and going for

Re: [Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Jul 2011, at 13:03, Paul Wise (Debian) 724...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Sladen pkg-fo...@paul.sladen.org wrote: My apologies for not being more explicit.  *In light of the on-going naming scheme

[Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-15 Thread Paul Wise (Debian)
I guess you didn't notice, but in Debian we are moving to a new font package naming policy. We are getting rid of the format-specific prefix for font packages and going for fonts-[foundry-]fontname, where the foundry is completely option and should only be used for disambiguation purposes. Also,

[Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-15 Thread Paul Sladen
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Sladen wrote: ... which is from before the renaming scheme started. ... ... Does it fit with the current naming scheme? I guess you didn't notice, My apologies for not being more explicit. *In light of the on-going naming

[Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-15 Thread Paul Wise (Debian)
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Sladen pkg-fo...@paul.sladen.org wrote: My apologies for not being more explicit.  *In light of the on-going naming scheme change*, I would appreciate some guidance on what to call binary fonts of varying formats derived from the same (source) typeface.

[Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-15 Thread Paul Sladen
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Sladen pkg-fo...@paul.sladen.org wrote: 'psf-' or 'console-' as a prefix, or postfix. using fonts-[foundry]-fontname-console. Okay-dokey, '-console' is certainly a possibility then. I think I would be putting all